From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59622 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755096AbbAFNN1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2015 08:13:27 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 14:13:22 +0100 From: Karel Zak To: Benno Schulenberg Cc: util-linux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] docs: improve some wordings on the man page of wipefs Message-ID: <20150106131322.GH18528@x2.net.home> References: <1419848226-2533-1-git-send-email-bensberg@justemail.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1419848226-2533-1-git-send-email-bensberg@justemail.net> Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:16:57AM +0100, Benno Schulenberg wrote: > misc-utils/wipefs.8 | 33 +++++++++++++++++---------------- > 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) Grrr... I see you resent the patches :-) Please, please, use --in-reply-to= or at least "V2" in subject next time when you re-send patches. I thought it's another set of patches. Or ideally use github to keep your patches up to date in some task specific branch, then I can merge all by one git-pull command. In this case is enough to send to mailing list info that you have updated the patches. (Ask Sami for more details, he uses this way :-) Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com