Util-Linux package development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Henriksson <andreas@fatal.se>
To: util-linux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Serge Schneider <serge@raspberrypi.org>
Subject: hwclock's synchronize_to_clock_tick_rtc returns inconsistent values
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:36:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150416203604.GA6523@fatal.se> (raw)

Hello!

The below forwarded issue seems to have been introduced in
commit ab8f402952301106ad0bd5c5a51dc
"hwclock: don't confuse users with select() timeout warning"

This issue is also tracked at http://bugs.debian.org/782726

Regards,
Andreas Henriksson

----- Forwarded message from Serge Schneider <serge@raspberrypi.org> -----

Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 20:24:26 +0100
From: Serge Schneider <serge@raspberrypi.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#782726: util-linux: hwclock's synchronize_to_clock_tick_rtc
	returns inconsistent values
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/31.6.0

Package: util-linux
Version: 2.25.2-6
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,
                        rc = select(rtc_fd + 1, &rfds, NULL, NULL, &tv);
                        ret = 1;
                        if (rc == -1)
                                warn(_("select() to %s to wait for clock tick
failed"),
                                     rtc_dev_name);
                        else if (rc == 0 && debug)
                                printf(_("select() to %s to wait for clock
tick timed out"),
                                     rtc_dev_name);
                        else
                                ret = 0;

When 'select' times out and returns 0, synchronize_to_clock_tick_rtc returns
either 1 or 0, depnding on whether the -D option (debug) was used. This causes
hwclock -r to succeed and hwclock -r -D to return an error. In one case, it
just fails, in the other, the values are off by the timeout period (10
seconds, in this version).

pi@test-pi ~/dev/util-linux-2.25.2 $ sudo ./hwclock -r
Thu 16 Apr 2015 19:18:44 UTC  -10.016913 seconds
pi@test-pi ~/dev/util-linux-2.25.2 $ sudo ./hwclock -r -D
hwclock from util-linux 2.25.2
Using the /dev interface to the clock.
Last drift adjustment done at 1429205484 seconds after 1969
Last calibration done at 1429205484 seconds after 1969
Hardware clock is on UTC time
Assuming hardware clock is kept in UTC time.
Waiting for clock tick...
select() to /dev/rtc0 to wait for clock tick timed out...synchronization
failed

----- End forwarded message -----

             reply	other threads:[~2015-04-16 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-16 20:36 Andreas Henriksson [this message]
2015-04-20  0:16 ` hwclock's synchronize_to_clock_tick_rtc returns inconsistent values J William Piggott
2015-04-20 12:21   ` Karel Zak
2015-04-21  2:50     ` J William Piggott
2015-04-22  2:18       ` J William Piggott
2015-04-22  7:46         ` Karel Zak
2015-04-22 16:45           ` J William Piggott
2015-04-22 18:07             ` Andreas Henriksson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150416203604.GA6523@fatal.se \
    --to=andreas@fatal.se \
    --cc=serge@raspberrypi.org \
    --cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox