From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37799 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752965AbbEOKyE (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2015 06:54:04 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 12:54:02 +0200 From: Karel Zak To: Heiko Carstens Cc: WANG Chao , util-linux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] lscpu: add cpu flags entry to summary output Message-ID: <20150515105402.GI4834@ws.net.home> References: <1431486905-63291-1-git-send-email-wcwxyz@gmail.com> <20150513093207.GD4834@ws.net.home> <20150515073747.GB4280@osiris> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20150515073747.GB4280@osiris> Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 09:37:48AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:32:07AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:15:05AM +0800, WANG Chao wrote: > > > sys-utils/lscpu.c | 3 +++ > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > Applied, thanks. > > Hello Karel, > > just a general question, from my understanding the the summary output > is supposed to be human readable. I'm not sure how a 500+ character > line fits into this. It's last line printed by lscpu, so terminal wraps it and from my point of view it's still pretty human readable. > At least it doesn't fit to the current layout of the summary output, > but maybe that's just my impression. Any suggestion how to improve it? I think that provide incomplete info and force people to read also /proc/cpuinfo is bad idea. Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com