From: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: util-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] libmount: handle arbitrary line length for mounts
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 10:18:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150827081827.GD2410@ws.net.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jK3zxjp3rSoGxCUGC0KhOQOLFrMyhX6fvOiUMAf+5wdeQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 04:44:04PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:49:23PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> @@ -212,6 +212,8 @@ struct libmnt_table {
> >> int comms; /* enable/disable comment parsing */
> >> char *comm_intro; /* First comment in file */
> >> char *comm_tail; /* Last comment in file */
> >> + char *buf; /* Memory for reading lines */
> >> + size_t buf_size; /* Size of line-reading buffer */
> >
> > It's overkill to add the buffer to the struct, it's necessary
> > only in mnt_table_parse_next().
>
> It seemed really inefficient to go from a stack buffer to a
> malloc-per-call of mnt_table_parse_next(). I'm fine to write it that
> way, though. What do you think is best here?
I'll try to prepare a patch with new struct libmnt_parser where we can
store another parser specific things like current line number, file
name, etc.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-27 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-26 22:49 [PATCH v2 2/2] libmount: handle arbitrary line length for mounts Kees Cook
2015-08-26 23:34 ` Karel Zak
2015-08-26 23:44 ` Kees Cook
2015-08-27 8:18 ` Karel Zak [this message]
2015-08-27 0:16 ` Mike Frysinger
2015-08-27 0:44 ` Kees Cook
2015-08-27 9:26 ` Karel Zak
2015-08-27 17:01 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150827081827.GD2410@ws.net.home \
--to=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox