From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52040 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750969AbdEQNvQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 May 2017 09:51:16 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 15:51:11 +0200 From: Karel Zak To: Bernhard Voelker Cc: Ruediger Meier , util-linux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: versioning Message-ID: <20170517135111.2yi5oohkkohwjgma@ws.net.home> References: <20170517074741.ltxnoawwvj56gc3m@ws.net.home> <201705171042.53414.sweet_f_a@gmx.de> <201705171047.13926.sweet_f_a@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 03:23:11PM +0200, Bernhard Voelker wrote: > On 05/17/2017 10:47 AM, Ruediger Meier wrote: > > v2.30 > > v2.30.1 > > v2.30.2 > > v3.0 > > v3.1 > > v3.2 > > +1 to all your arguments - v31 and v31.1 look really odd. Well, the idea behind v31 is to make difference between the current schema and the new one. The version number v3.1 maybe interpreted as a new major release that is incompatible with v2. Anyway, I have no strong opinion about it. It's just number :-) I can live with v3.1 too. Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com