util-linux.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] lscpu: fix incorrect number of sockets during hotplug
@ 2024-11-04  6:32 Anjali K
  2024-11-04 12:08 ` Karel Zak
  2024-11-06  9:51 ` Karel Zak
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anjali K @ 2024-11-04  6:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: util-linux; +Cc: kzak, anushree.mathur, anjalik

lscpu sometimes shows incorrect 'Socket(s)' value if a hotplug operation
is running.
On a 32 CPU 2-socket system, the expected output is as shown below:
Architecture:           	      ppc64le
Byte Order:             	      Little Endian
CPU(s):                  	      32
On-line CPU(s) list:   		      0-31
Model name:               	      POWER10 (architected), altivec supported
Model:                  	      2.0 (pvr 0080 0200)
Thread(s) per core:     	      8
Core(s) per socket:     	      2
Socket(s):              	      2

On the same system, if hotplug is running along with lscpu, it shows
"Socket(s):" as 3 and 4 incorrectly sometimes.
Architecture:                         ppc64le
Byte Order:                           Little Endian
CPU(s):                               32
On-line CPU(s) list:                  0-11,16-31
Off-line CPU(s) list:                 12-15
Model name:                           POWER10 (architected), altivec supported
Model:                                2.0 (pvr 0080 0200)
Thread(s) per core:                   8
Core(s) per socket:                   1
Socket(s):                            3

The number of sockets is considered as the number of unique core_siblings
CPU groups. The issues causing the number of sockets to sometimes be
higher during hotplug is:
1. The core_siblings of CPUs on the same socket are different because a CPU
on the socket has been onlined/offlined in between. In the below example,
nr sockets was wrongly incremented for CPU 5 though CPU 4 and 5 are on the
same socket because their core_siblings was different as CPU 12 was onlined
in between.
CPU: 4
core_siblings: ff f0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CPU: 5
core_siblings: ff f8 0 0 0 0 0 0

2. The core_siblings file of a CPU is created when a CPU is onlined. It may
have an invalid value for some time until the online operation is fully
complete. In the below example, nr sockets is wrongly incremented because
the core_siblings of CPU 14 was 0 as it had just been onlined.
CPU: 14
core_siblings: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

To fix this, make the below changes:
1. Instead of considering CPUs to be on different sockets if their
core_siblings masks are unequal, consider them to be on different sockets
only if their core_siblings masks don't have even one common CPU. Then CPUs
on the same socket will be correctly identified even if offline/online
operations happen while they are read if at least one CPU in the socket is
online during both reads.
2. Check if a CPU's hotplug operation has been completed before using its
core_siblings file

Reported-by: Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anjali K <anjalik@linux.ibm.com>
---
 sys-utils/lscpu-topology.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sys-utils/lscpu-topology.c b/sys-utils/lscpu-topology.c
index e3742e319..7fb4a1af9 100644
--- a/sys-utils/lscpu-topology.c
+++ b/sys-utils/lscpu-topology.c
@@ -17,19 +17,25 @@
 #include <unistd.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <stdio.h>
+#include <ctype.h>
 
 #include "lscpu.h"
 
 /* add @set to the @ary, unnecessary set is deallocated. */
-static int add_cpuset_to_array(cpu_set_t **ary, size_t *items, cpu_set_t *set, size_t setsize)
+static int add_cpuset_to_array(cpu_set_t **ary, size_t *items, cpu_set_t *set, size_t setsize, cpu_set_t *common_cpus_set)
 {
 	size_t i;
 
 	if (!ary)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/*
+	 * Check if @set has no cpu in common with the cpusets
+	 * saved in @ary and if so append @set to @ary.
+	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < *items; i++) {
-		if (CPU_EQUAL_S(setsize, set, ary[i]))
+		CPU_AND_S(setsize, common_cpus_set, set, ary[i]);
+		if (CPU_COUNT_S(setsize, common_cpus_set))
 			break;
 	}
 	if (i == *items) {
@@ -98,14 +104,49 @@ void lscpu_sort_caches(struct lscpu_cache *caches, size_t n)
 		qsort(caches, n, sizeof(struct lscpu_cache), cmp_cache);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Get the hotplug state number representing a completely online
+ * cpu from /sys/devices/system/cpu/hotplug/state
+ */
+static int get_online_state(struct path_cxt *sys)
+{
+	int hp_online_state_val, page_size, rc;
+	char *buf, *strp;
+
+	hp_online_state_val = -1;
+
+	/* sysfs text files have size = page size */
+	page_size = getpagesize();
+
+	buf = (char *)malloc(page_size);
+	if (!buf)
+		goto done;
+	rc = ul_path_readf_buffer(sys, buf, page_size, "hotplug/states");
+	if (rc <= 0)
+		goto done;
+
+	strp = strstr(buf, ": online");
+	if (!strp)
+		goto done;
+
+	strp--; /* get digits before ': online' */
+	while (strp >= buf && isdigit(*strp))
+		strp--;
+	hp_online_state_val = atoi(strp + 1);
+
+done:
+	free(buf);
+	return hp_online_state_val;
+}
 
 /* Read topology for specified type */
 static int cputype_read_topology(struct lscpu_cxt *cxt, struct lscpu_cputype *ct)
 {
 	size_t i, npos;
 	struct path_cxt *sys;
-	int nthreads = 0, sw_topo = 0;
+	int nthreads = 0, sw_topo = 0, rc, hp_state, hp_online_state;
 	FILE *fd;
+	cpu_set_t *temp_set;
 
 	sys = cxt->syscpu;				/* /sys/devices/system/cpu/ */
 	npos = cxt->npossibles;				/* possible CPUs */
@@ -113,6 +154,12 @@ static int cputype_read_topology(struct lscpu_cxt *cxt, struct lscpu_cputype *ct
 	DBG(TYPE, ul_debugobj(ct, "reading %s/%s/%s topology",
 				ct->vendor ?: "", ct->model ?: "", ct->modelname ?:""));
 
+	hp_online_state = get_online_state(sys);
+
+	temp_set = CPU_ALLOC(cxt->maxcpus);
+	if (!temp_set)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	for (i = 0; i < cxt->npossibles; i++) {
 		struct lscpu_cpu *cpu = cxt->cpus[i];
 		cpu_set_t *thread_siblings = NULL, *core_siblings = NULL;
@@ -127,6 +174,15 @@ static int cputype_read_topology(struct lscpu_cxt *cxt, struct lscpu_cputype *ct
 					"cpu%d/topology/thread_siblings", num) != 0)
 			continue;
 
+		/*
+		 * Ignore cpus which are not fully online.
+		 * If hp_online_state is negative/zero or rc is negative,
+		 * online state could not be read correctly, skip this check.
+		 */
+		rc = ul_path_readf_s32(sys, &hp_state, "cpu%d/hotplug/state", num);
+		if (hp_online_state > 0 && rc >= 0 && hp_state != hp_online_state)
+			continue;
+
 		/* read topology maps */
 		ul_path_readf_cpuset(sys, &thread_siblings, cxt->maxcpus,
 					"cpu%d/topology/thread_siblings", num);
@@ -163,15 +219,16 @@ static int cputype_read_topology(struct lscpu_cxt *cxt, struct lscpu_cputype *ct
 
 		/* add to topology maps */
 		if (thread_siblings)
-			add_cpuset_to_array(ct->coremaps, &ct->ncores, thread_siblings, cxt->setsize);
+			add_cpuset_to_array(ct->coremaps, &ct->ncores, thread_siblings, cxt->setsize, temp_set);
 		if (core_siblings)
-			add_cpuset_to_array(ct->socketmaps, &ct->nsockets, core_siblings, cxt->setsize);
+			add_cpuset_to_array(ct->socketmaps, &ct->nsockets, core_siblings, cxt->setsize, temp_set);
 		if (book_siblings)
-			add_cpuset_to_array(ct->bookmaps, &ct->nbooks, book_siblings, cxt->setsize);
+			add_cpuset_to_array(ct->bookmaps, &ct->nbooks, book_siblings, cxt->setsize, temp_set);
 		if (drawer_siblings)
-			add_cpuset_to_array(ct->drawermaps, &ct->ndrawers, drawer_siblings, cxt->setsize);
+			add_cpuset_to_array(ct->drawermaps, &ct->ndrawers, drawer_siblings, cxt->setsize, temp_set);
 
 	}
+	CPU_FREE(temp_set);
 
 	/* s390 detects its cpu topology via /proc/sysinfo, if present.
 	 * Using simply the cpu topology masks in sysfs will not give

base-commit: 9e2aafe5a493284615a17572c4ead4737bcc66a3
-- 
2.46.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] lscpu: fix incorrect number of sockets during hotplug
  2024-11-04  6:32 [PATCH v2] lscpu: fix incorrect number of sockets during hotplug Anjali K
@ 2024-11-04 12:08 ` Karel Zak
  2024-11-06  9:51 ` Karel Zak
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Karel Zak @ 2024-11-04 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anjali K; +Cc: util-linux, anushree.mathur


Thank you, it looks good. I made some cosmetic changes to the patch
and created a pull request to run it through CI tests on GitHub.

 https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/pull/3265

 Thanks!

On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 12:02:26PM GMT, Anjali K wrote:
>  sys-utils/lscpu-topology.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@redhat.com>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] lscpu: fix incorrect number of sockets during hotplug
  2024-11-04  6:32 [PATCH v2] lscpu: fix incorrect number of sockets during hotplug Anjali K
  2024-11-04 12:08 ` Karel Zak
@ 2024-11-06  9:51 ` Karel Zak
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Karel Zak @ 2024-11-06  9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anjali K; +Cc: util-linux, anushree.mathur

On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 12:02:26PM GMT, Anjali K wrote:
>  sys-utils/lscpu-topology.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks.

    Karel


-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@redhat.com>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-11-06  9:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-11-04  6:32 [PATCH v2] lscpu: fix incorrect number of sockets during hotplug Anjali K
2024-11-04 12:08 ` Karel Zak
2024-11-06  9:51 ` Karel Zak

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).