From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@tiscalinet.it>
To: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>, Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Cc: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@inwind.it>,
util-linux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Subject: Re: Btrfs: wipe all the superblock [redhat bugzilla 889888]
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:09:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50EC7CF9.9010308@tiscalinet.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130108180126.GB9177@x2.net.home>
Hi Karel,
On 01/08/2013 07:01 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 07:28:55PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
>> If the first superblock is valid except that the "magic field" is zeroed,
>> btrfs skips the check of the other superblocks.
>> If the first superblock is fully invalid, btrfs checks for the other
>> superblock.
>
> Hmm... why inconsistent (or missing) superblock is not reported as a
> problem? If I good understand the filesystem is still mountable,
> right?
It should, however my tests were unsuccessful :-(... Chris ?
>
>> So zeroing the first superblock "magic field" at the beginning seems
>> that the filesystem is wiped.
>
> Well, this is exactly the idea behind wipefs(8), just wipe minimal
> number of bytes from the device to make the filesystem invisible for
> libblkid (udev, ...). This concept is relatively safe, if you make a
> mistake than you can restore the magic string, your data should not
> be affected by wipefs(8).
I fully agree. However wipefs should zero all three superblock
>
> Karel
>
--
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-08 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-06 18:28 Btrfs: wipe all the superblock [redhat bugzilla 889888] Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-01-07 16:33 ` David Sterba
2013-01-07 18:20 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-01-07 18:24 ` Hugo Mills
2013-01-07 18:33 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-01-08 17:14 ` David Sterba
2013-01-08 15:48 ` Günter Gersdorf
2013-01-08 20:31 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-01-09 8:09 ` Günter Gersdorf
2013-01-08 16:43 ` Karel Zak
2013-01-09 17:48 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-01-09 18:10 ` Karel Zak
2013-01-08 18:01 ` Karel Zak
2013-01-08 20:09 ` Goffredo Baroncelli [this message]
2013-01-08 20:27 ` Chris Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50EC7CF9.9010308@tiscalinet.it \
--to=kreijack@tiscalinet.it \
--cc=chris.mason@fusionio.com \
--cc=kreijack@inwind.it \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox