public inbox for util-linux@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ángel González" <ingenit@zoho.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, util-linux@vger.kernel.org,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>, Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] enter: new command (light wrapper around setns)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:13:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F01013.2000100@zoho.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fw283rht.fsf@xmission.com>

On 11/01/13 12:10, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Eric W. Biederman
>> <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Inspired by unshare, enter is a simple wrapper around setns that
>>> allows running a new process in the context of an existing process.
>>
>> The name "enter" seems way too generic (far more so than even
>> "unshare"). How about "nsexec" or "execns" or some such?
> 
> Enter unlike exec is the right concept, and the name is free.

What about enterns ?

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-11 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-11 10:29 [PATCH] enter: new command (light wrapper around setns) Eric W. Biederman
2013-01-11 10:54 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2013-01-11 11:10   ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-01-11 13:13     ` Ángel González [this message]
2013-01-12  8:59     ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2013-01-11 16:13 ` Karel Zak
2013-01-11 22:11   ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-01-12  9:01     ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2013-01-11 22:46   ` [PATCH] nsenter: " Eric W. Biederman
2013-01-11 23:45     ` Mike Frysinger
2013-01-14  8:28       ` Karel Zak
2013-01-17  0:33         ` [PATCH 0/5] nsenter review comment fixes Eric W. Biederman
2013-01-17  0:34           ` [PATCH 1/5] nsenter: Enhance waiting for a child process Eric W. Biederman
2013-01-17  0:34           ` [PATCH 2/5] nsenter: Properly spell significant in a comment Eric W. Biederman
2013-01-17  0:35           ` [PATCH 3/5] nsenter: Add const to declarations where possible Eric W. Biederman
2013-01-17  0:35           ` [PATCH 4/5] nsenter: Replace a bare strtoul with strtoul_or_err Eric W. Biederman
2013-01-17  0:36           ` [PATCH 5/5] unshare,nsenter: Move the old libc handling into a common header namespace.h Eric W. Biederman
2013-01-17  3:11           ` [PATCH 0/5] nsenter review comment fixes Mike Frysinger
2013-01-17 12:35           ` Karel Zak
2013-01-15 18:51     ` [PATCH] nsenter: new command (light wrapper around setns) Serge E. Hallyn
2013-01-17 12:34     ` Karel Zak
2013-01-11 22:53   ` [PATCH] unshare: Add support for the pid and user namespaces Eric W. Biederman
2013-01-17 12:35     ` Karel Zak
2013-01-17 12:56       ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50F01013.2000100@zoho.com \
    --to=ingenit@zoho.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=kzak@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox