From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org
Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.120]:43157 "EHLO
	cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1757309AbaC0Usn (ORCPT
	<rfc822;util-linux@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 27 Mar 2014 16:48:43 -0400
Message-ID: <53348EA9.1090507@ubuntu.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 16:48:41 -0400
From: Phillip Susi <psusi@ubuntu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?TWFudGFzIE1pa3VsxJduYXM=?= <grawity@gmail.com>,
        util-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tty swtch key
References: <533320C5.7040609@ubuntu.com> <lh1ra8$dd7$1@ger.gmane.org> <53347A8E.7060608@ubuntu.com> <53348639.1040100@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <53348639.1040100@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <util-linux.vger.kernel.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 3/27/2014 4:12 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> Actually it sounds quite similar to the descriptions of how the old
> shl worked... (see Message-ID:
> <cjs1ka$e25@harn.ceas.rochester.edu>)

See that message id where?


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTNI6oAAoJEI5FoCIzSKrwgpUH/Ag8tpw3KXBY8Yq3gopJ5kHy
xngV/ZmnoplMKttwg/AvZNc3m2bgerUgjZB4TYYlDbAPw+IYvyIfcw48MA169hog
bd+tVFiUTtc9nOLzWsPbXRjHn9RYq1OnS90UZvjR+aNytYQTruaE6iOstxVcgJL4
WugWb/b+Oq+H2DtR6RGZL4akR7zM0I+AVGoUNtNaw3g3j/x7uOd8Xg9OEJ0APQmL
2BS8zYLHFbivaITWDx182L6FlDi9SEfBvwp1qDUKEG20o2I0yGjBaHvYhF7brEER
Swg5Q6xwHDjgI1mZ4aNB6JHv2kC9ojNp0d4LpRDPneks8IgI7n0XB4dMMqKNSm0=
=j8Bt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----