From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.120]:50993 "EHLO cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757299AbaC1BrI (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Mar 2014 21:47:08 -0400 Message-ID: <5334D49A.6040803@ubuntu.com> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 21:47:06 -0400 From: Phillip Susi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?TWFudGFzIE1pa3VsxJduYXM=?= CC: util-linux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: tty swtch key References: <533320C5.7040609@ubuntu.com> <53347A8E.7060608@ubuntu.com> <53348639.1040100@gmail.com> <53348EA9.1090507@ubuntu.com> <5334B42D.1010304@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5334B42D.1010304@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 03/27/2014 07:28 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > On 2014-03-27 22:48, Phillip Susi wrote: >> On 3/27/2014 4:12 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: >>> Actually it sounds quite similar to the descriptions of how the >>> old shl worked... (see Message-ID: >>> ) >> >> See that message id where? > > The mbox folder attached to the previous message, unless it got > lost. Thanks, I didn't notice the attachment. So it sounds like maybe this should be removed from both stty and the kernel then, since it was never implemented and won't ever be? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTNNSaAAoJEI5FoCIzSKrw7L8IAJJTMS+LpfUTQHQZRlb6A8zZ MYKSvL7dCTt/BkJmAz7r/+f0qZSVZInuJnySoeyTgmcHD45M6AWSvZrfmNqwH+d5 8L5MSUBG8tdCCP6ByruhbJJD/txheO0BmwabslZlwxA7tNgf46FfiSbG/IQLczqa 4H1fIQc+oWruIWfQ8q0T+bUy0BJJAx9uMu6vkgAW6L5g6pBbFRn6fsppf+fF04f7 rDc51/Uk0FOntRm+cu58al9N+18K+Q9/K9fVcGeEbXsMk2KjCb5E76hQwPWnu0mV QVzWWOck+3mplaITwWPhy2tabsxk1q1TcvyvWyj0GKKaVnmvBioM3E1GMZ8PEr4= =3JZD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----