From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: phillsusi@gmail.com Sender: Phillip Susi Message-ID: <547343EA.6090606@ubuntu.com> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 09:42:50 -0500 From: Phillip Susi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Karel Zak , Drake Wilson CC: util-linux@vger.kernel.org, 770211@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: LUKS partition types, redux References: <546D0495.2030803@dasyatidae.net> <20141124113733.GC926@x2.net.home> In-Reply-To: <20141124113733.GC926@x2.net.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 List-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/24/2014 6:37 AM, Karel Zak wrote: > The current trend is to use partition type to define for what > purpose we want to use the partition (for example "this is /home") > independently on partition format. I wouldn't call this bone headed idea of redhat's a trend. Using partition table type codes to decide to auto mount in particular parts of the filesystem is such a brain damaged idea, those who thought it up need beaten with a clue-by-four and its use needs to be *strongly* discouraged. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUc0PqAAoJEI5FoCIzSKrwF3AIAKsduxIzyXOqSlCf0emWc/m3 r/QmAMqyFG5ua1msWmAQaeTTnSFYqwyf4xubIQay8PTd0ruT7Hq/rusu4DCS1aQ1 fecZQhTQi/HHBbZ3mM8w472IB2PM5qDNEDDwZkgbOCpBoEByeZUZFqq+stFSakoD CHc4sVqHj5FPA3HRq+XuCfqhawc3TcGaO40J0qr0c+7vMm1cAHLIAjifRR8WNrnf UNk+kDfZJwixaL45t/YcHx001FNJO9Aitj42KV5k4cHke2wAmcmSVj4T9k0NgoCE TfeDbJrhuQPtJ/V1/oE7q3aH9agppucuEcIjW5Y4ICnqgCeydwlfVfx+FMlVLTk= =xHEg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----