From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:63322 "EHLO mout.gmx.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932451AbbBPLhT (ORCPT <rfc822;util-linux@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 16 Feb 2015 06:37:19 -0500
Message-ID: <54E1D668.3070001@gmx.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 06:37:12 -0500
From: J William Piggott <elseifthen@gmx.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>, util-linux <util-linux@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: RFC hwclock: refactoring
References: <5470FE32.9030805@gmx.com> <CAG27Bk3zu-8Qar_k44uM3_8_kOddJkqvb1be1_KmjkBGfBGcYA@mail.gmail.com> <20150216090226.GG4075@vapier>
In-Reply-To: <20150216090226.GG4075@vapier>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <util-linux.vger.kernel.org>

On 02/16/2015 04:02 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 23 Nov 2014 13:31, Sami Kerola wrote:
>> On 22 November 2014 at 21:20, JWP wrote:
>>> Do we need Alpha code?  Is there a Linux distro that
>>> still officially supports Alpha machines?
>>
>> I'm not sure if there is any up to date distribution for Alpha.
> 
> Gentoo still produces up-to-date releases
> -mike
>
Hello Mike,

Yes, I contacted the two most authoritative Alpha people I could find,
Tobias Klausmann and Matt Turner. Matt requested that we continue to
maintain hwclock's Alpha code. I forgot to post a follow up here about
it, sorry.

William