From: Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org>
To: util-linux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Marc Lehmann" <debian-reportbug@plan9.de>,
1141670@bugs.debian.org, наб <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz>
Subject: Re: Bug#1141670: util-linux: very slow code and undefined behaviour in handle_interrupt
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2026 19:34:41 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alLEV6xOOwA1RzU_@zeha.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <178350371646.36377.6056214111743171473.reportbug@cerebro.laendle>
Hi util-linux maintainers,
the following was reported to Debian, regarding the hardlink
utility. It appears to be an upstream issue. Maybe someone can look
at it. CC:ing наб who seems to have touched the relevant function
last.
Thanks,
Chris
* Marc Lehmann <debian-reportbug@plan9.de> [260708 07:23]:
>Version: 2.41-5
>
>Dear Maintainer,
>
>while strace'ing to find out why hardlink is so slow, IO found it does this sequence between every fstatat call:
>
> gettid() = 36482
> getpid() = 36482
> tgkill(36482, 36482, 0) = 0
>
>this seems to be a pretty weird thing to do in a tighht scanning
>loop. Looking at the code, handle_interrupt is responsible:
>
> /**
> * handle_interrupt - Handle a signal
> */
> static void handle_interrupt(void)
> {
> switch (last_signal) {
> case SIGUSR1:
> print_stats();
> putchar('\n');
> break;
> default:
> signal(last_signal, SIG_DFL);
> raise(last_signal);
> break;
> }
> last_signal = 0;
> }
>
>this is already a weird function to begin with, but crucially, it calls signal(0,... and raise(0).
>
>it seems to me the former is likely undefined behaviour and the latter is
>just unnecessartily slow.
>
>most likely, handle_interrupt simply should not be called after every fstatat, or at all, without last_signal bering set beforehand.
>
next parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-11 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <178350371646.36377.6056214111743171473.reportbug@cerebro.laendle>
2026-07-11 22:34 ` Chris Hofstaedtler [this message]
2026-07-12 9:02 ` Bug#1141670: util-linux: very slow code and undefined behaviour in handle_interrupt Dirk Gouders
2026-07-13 11:19 ` Karel Zak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alLEV6xOOwA1RzU_@zeha.at \
--to=zeha@debian.org \
--cc=1141670@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=debian-reportbug@plan9.de \
--cc=nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox