From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from woodbine.london.02.net ([87.194.255.145]:39835 "EHLO woodbine.london.02.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752964Ab2KYNrs (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Nov 2012 08:47:48 -0500 Received: from cartman.offog.org (94.194.126.16) by woodbine.london.02.net (8.5.140) id 4FED9DF103CC98F3 for util-linux@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 13:42:37 +0000 Received: from ats by cartman.offog.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1TccTk-0001Qj-NQ for util-linux@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 13:42:36 +0000 From: Adam Sampson To: util-linux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] docs: mention Open Group requirements References: <1353844871-6047-1-git-send-email-kerolasa@iki.fi> <1353844871-6047-2-git-send-email-kerolasa@iki.fi> Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 13:42:36 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1353844871-6047-2-git-send-email-kerolasa@iki.fi> (Sami Kerola's message of "Sun, 25 Nov 2012 12:01:08 +0000") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Sami Kerola writes: > + conflict with the latest standard. For example it is > + recommendable not to add short command line options before they > + are part of standard. Introducing new short options is > + acceptable. Should that second "short" be "long"? -- Adam Sampson