From: "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>
To: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>, v9fs@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 9p/xen: Use flexible array for data rings
Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 07:39:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <147ee577-8a72-407c-b332-45dda9f153b3@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260519015739.634423-1-rosenp@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1002 bytes --]
On 19.05.26 03:57, Rosen Penev wrote:
> Store the fixed set of Xen 9p data rings in the frontend private
> allocation instead of allocating a separate rings array.
>
> This keeps the data ring storage tied to the frontend lifetime and
> simplifies the allocation and cleanup paths.
>
> Assisted-by: Codex:GPT-5.5
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/9p/trans_xen.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/9p/trans_xen.c b/net/9p/trans_xen.c
> index f9fb2db7a066..5a110d71d18c 100644
> --- a/net/9p/trans_xen.c
> +++ b/net/9p/trans_xen.c
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ struct xen_9pfs_front_priv {
> char *tag;
> struct p9_client *client;
>
> - struct xen_9pfs_dataring *rings;
> + struct xen_9pfs_dataring rings[];
Any reason not to use rings[XEN_9PFS_NUM_RINGS] instead of a flex array?
The number of rings is a compile time constant, after all!
Juergen
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3743 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-27 5:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-19 1:57 [PATCH] 9p/xen: Use flexible array for data rings Rosen Penev
2026-05-27 5:39 ` Jürgen Groß [this message]
2026-05-27 6:38 ` Rosen Penev
2026-05-27 10:07 ` Jürgen Groß
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=147ee577-8a72-407c-b332-45dda9f153b3@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
--cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox