From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Pierre Barre <pierre@barre.sh>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, ericvh@kernel.org, lucho@ionkov.net,
asmadeus@codewreck.org, linux_oss@crudebyte.com,
v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] 9p: fix i_size update race in getattr with writeback caching
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 13:38:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1642497.1771421883@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251227180137.730385-1-pierre@barre.sh>
Pierre Barre <pierre@barre.sh> wrote:
> With writeback caching (cache=mmap), v9fs_stat2inode() and
> v9fs_stat2inode_dotl() unconditionally overwrite i_size from the server
> response, even when dirty pages may exist locally. This causes processes
> using lseek(SEEK_END) to see incorrect file sizes, leading to data
> corruption when extending files while concurrent stat() calls occur.
>
> Fix by passing V9FS_STAT2INODE_KEEP_ISIZE when CACHE_WRITEBACK is
> enabled to preserve the client's authoritative i_size.
I think this might be the wrong approach.
A better way is probably, in v9fs_stat2inode() and v9fs_stat2inode_dotl(), if
the inode isn't new, compare the values for stat->mtime to inode->i_mtime and
stat->length to v9inode->netfs.remote_i_size and if they differ mark the inode
as being remotely modified, invalidate the pagecache and reset inode->i_size.
If stat->mtime == inode->i_mtime and stat->length ==
v9inode->netfs.remote_i_size, then don't alter inode->i_size.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-18 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-27 18:01 [PATCH v2] 9p: fix i_size update race in getattr with writeback caching Pierre Barre
2026-01-05 11:35 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2026-01-07 0:27 ` Pierre Barre
2026-02-04 11:48 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2026-02-15 9:21 ` Dominique Martinet
2026-02-17 14:48 ` David Howells
2026-02-17 15:05 ` David Howells
2026-02-17 16:54 ` David Howells
2026-02-18 13:38 ` David Howells [this message]
2026-02-18 13:41 ` David Howells
2026-02-18 14:11 ` Dominique Martinet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1642497.1771421883@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=pierre@barre.sh \
--cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox