From: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
To: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
kernel-team@fb.com, v9fs@lists.linux.dev,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Manu Bretelle <chantr4@gmail.com>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iov_iter: fix advancing slot in iter_folioq_get_pages()
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 10:47:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241001094747.GA1483717@e124191.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cbaf141ba6c0e2e209717d02746584072844841a.1727722269.git.osandov@fb.com>
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 11:55:00AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
>
> iter_folioq_get_pages() decides to advance to the next folioq slot when
> it has reached the end of the current folio. However, it is checking
> offset, which is the beginning of the current part, instead of
> iov_offset, which is adjusted to the end of the current part, so it
> doesn't advance the slot when it's supposed to. As a result, on the next
> iteration, we'll use the same folio with an out-of-bounds offset and
> return an unrelated page.
>
> This manifested as various crashes and other failures in 9pfs in drgn's
> VM testing setup and BPF CI.
>
> Fixes: db0aa2e9566f ("mm: Define struct folio_queue and ITER_FOLIOQ to handle a sequence of folios")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20240923183432.1876750-1-chantr4@gmail.com/
> Tested-by: Manu Bretelle <chantr4@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
> ---
> lib/iov_iter.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/iov_iter.c b/lib/iov_iter.c
> index 97003155bfac..1abb32c0da50 100644
> --- a/lib/iov_iter.c
> +++ b/lib/iov_iter.c
> @@ -1033,7 +1033,7 @@ static ssize_t iter_folioq_get_pages(struct iov_iter *iter,
> if (maxpages == 0 || extracted >= maxsize)
> break;
>
> - if (offset >= fsize) {
> + if (iov_offset >= fsize) {
> iov_offset = 0;
> slot++;
> if (slot == folioq_nr_slots(folioq) && folioq->next) {
This fixes booting for me with my 9pfs rootfs. Tested on next-20241001+this patch.
Tested-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-01 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-30 18:55 [PATCH] iov_iter: fix advancing slot in iter_folioq_get_pages() Omar Sandoval
2024-09-30 19:27 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-09-30 20:10 ` David Howells
2024-10-01 5:52 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-10-01 9:47 ` Joey Gouly [this message]
2024-10-01 9:50 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241001094747.GA1483717@e124191.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chantr4@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox