From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>,
netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs@lists.linux.dev,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] netfs, cifs: Fixes to retry-related code
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 14:01:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2724318.1752066097@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKPOu+8z_ijTLHdiCYGU_Uk7yYD=shxyGLwfe-L7AV3DhebS3w@mail.gmail.com>
Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com> wrote:
> your commit 2b1424cd131c ("netfs: Fix wait/wake to be consistent about
> the waitqueue used") has given me serious headaches; it has caused
> outages in our web hosting clusters (yet again - all Linux versions
> since 6.9 had serious netfs regressions). Your patch was backported to
> 6.15 as commit 329ba1cb402a in 6.15.3 (why oh why??), and therefore
> the bugs it has caused will be "available" to all Linux stable users.
>
> The problem we had is that writing to certain files never finishes. It
> looks like it has to do with the cachefiles subrequest never reporting
> completion. (We use Ceph with cachefiles)
>
> I have tried applying the fixes in this pull request, which sounded
> promising, but the problem is still there. The only thing that helps
> is reverting 2b1424cd131c completely - everything is fine with 6.15.5
> plus the revert.
>
> What do you need from me in order to analyze the bug?
As a start, can you turn on:
echo 65536 >/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb
echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/netfs/netfs_read/enable
echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/netfs/netfs_rreq/enable
echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/netfs/netfs_sreq/enable
echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/netfs/netfs_failure/enable
If you keep an eye on /proc/fs/netfs/requests you should be able to see any
tasks in there that get stuck. If one gets stuck, then:
echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/enable
to stop further tracing.
Looking in /proc/fs/netfs/requests, you should be able to see the debug ID of
the stuck request. If you can try grepping the trace log for that:
grep "R=<8-digit-hex-id>" /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
that should hopefully let me see how things progressed on that call.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-09 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-01 16:38 [PATCH 00/13] netfs, cifs: Fixes to retry-related code David Howells
2025-07-01 16:38 ` [PATCH 01/13] netfs: Fix hang due to missing case in final DIO read result collection David Howells
2025-07-01 16:38 ` [PATCH 02/13] netfs: Fix double put of request David Howells
2025-07-01 16:38 ` [PATCH 03/13] netfs: Provide helpers to perform NETFS_RREQ_IN_PROGRESS flag wangling David Howells
2025-07-01 16:38 ` [PATCH 04/13] netfs: Fix looping in wait functions David Howells
2025-07-01 16:38 ` [PATCH 05/13] netfs: Fix ref leak on inserted extra subreq in write retry David Howells
2025-07-01 16:38 ` [PATCH 06/13] smb: client: set missing retry flag in smb2_writev_callback() David Howells
2025-07-01 16:38 ` [PATCH 07/13] smb: client: set missing retry flag in cifs_readv_callback() David Howells
2025-07-01 16:38 ` [PATCH 08/13] smb: client: set missing retry flag in cifs_writev_callback() David Howells
2025-07-01 16:38 ` [PATCH 09/13] smb: client: fix warning when reconnecting channel David Howells
2025-07-01 17:07 ` Steve French
2025-07-01 16:38 ` [PATCH 10/13] netfs: Fix i_size updating David Howells
2025-07-01 16:38 ` [PATCH 11/13] netfs: Merge i_size update functions David Howells
2025-07-01 16:38 ` [PATCH 12/13] netfs: Renumber the NETFS_RREQ_* flags to make traces easier to read David Howells
2025-07-01 16:38 ` [PATCH 13/13] netfs: Update tracepoints in a number of ways David Howells
2025-07-09 10:26 ` [PATCH 00/13] netfs, cifs: Fixes to retry-related code Max Kellermann
2025-07-09 13:01 ` David Howells [this message]
2025-07-09 19:04 ` Max Kellermann
2025-07-09 20:22 ` David Howells
2025-07-09 21:44 ` Max Kellermann
2025-07-10 10:47 ` David Howells
2025-07-10 11:17 ` David Howells
2025-07-10 13:41 ` Max Kellermann
2025-07-10 15:32 ` David Howells
2025-07-10 16:31 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2724318.1752066097@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=max.kellermann@ionos.com \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pc@manguebit.com \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox