From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>
Cc: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>,
v9fs@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: hangs after merge window changes
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 05:45:18 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZpgtXjz3pbJKUjL7@codewreck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFkjPTnktf6puYAyg4pNh8RtQvSuQnSo5VCQvinv=Cw9m1s9xQ@mail.gmail.com>
Eric Van Hensbergen wrote on Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 01:01:26PM -0500:
> I held way back on adding anything new over the past cycle, so this
> sounds likely some external change maybe perturbing an older issue.
> What guest side mount options, qemu options and qemu version are you
> using?
Mount option if any would be much appreciated, yes.
Also, what version you upgraded from to limit the limit the search a
bit; the previous 6.9 tree?
Also couldn't find much infos about the CI in general, given the traces
I don't think the workload matters all that much but it can give
something to start with e.g. running from initrd and mounting 9p or
using 9p as rootfs; that shouldn't make a difference but might as well
try to reproduce from something close to the actual netdev CI given the
low reproducibility.
> Dominique, you aware of anything coming in that might have messed with
> this? Maybe the new common code refactoring underpinning
> readahead/etc.?
Given the trace it's probably stuck in __wait_on_freeing_inode (the only
schedule() call in find_inode_fast), so we could be looking at
fallbacks from the iget changes but that made it in 6.9 already so
that's unlikely...
I have a feeling that adding cache will make the error go away if you
just want to fix tests for now, so would be great if you could try
adding -o cache=loose to the 9p mount options; hopefully the inodes
won't be freed as often and that'll make the race harder to hit.
I had a quick look at other globals fs changes and nothing stood out,
it's going to be fun to track down.
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 12:24 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Apologies for possible duplicate, I tried to search lore and haven't
> > found anything, but also I can't find the exact 9p archive there :S
The new list is here: https://lore.kernel.org/v9fs/
You probably didn't miss anything :)
--
Dominique
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-17 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-17 17:24 hangs after merge window changes Jakub Kicinski
2024-07-17 18:01 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2024-07-17 20:45 ` Dominique Martinet [this message]
2024-07-17 23:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-07-18 1:14 ` Dominique Martinet
2024-07-18 3:54 ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-07-18 4:08 ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-07-18 10:42 ` Jan Kara
2024-07-18 10:57 ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-07-18 11:40 ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-07-18 12:16 ` Jan Kara
2024-07-18 12:29 ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-07-17 21:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-07-17 22:00 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZpgtXjz3pbJKUjL7@codewreck.org \
--to=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox