From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>,
v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Subject: [GIT PULL] more 9p reverts for 6.12-rc5
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 06:36:01 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxwPQTUCnbGEt1KQ@codewreck.org> (raw)
Hi Linus,
- see tip commit (simplify iget revert) for full explanation.
This problem had been ignored for too long and the reverts will also
head to stable (6.9+)
- rebased yesterday to remove the use-folio revert that was applied
directly, but patches are fairly new anyway. I'm confident this set of
patches gets us back to previous behaviour (another related patch had
already been reverted back in April and we're almost back to square 1,
and the rest didn't touch inode lifecycle)
Thanks!
The following changes since commit 42f7652d3eb527d03665b09edac47f85fb600924:
Linux 6.12-rc4 (2024-10-20 15:19:38 -0700)
are available in the Git repository at:
https://github.com/martinetd/linux tags/9p-for-6.12-rc5
for you to fetch changes up to be2ca3825372085d669d322dccd0542a90e5b434:
Revert "fs/9p: simplify iget to remove unnecessary paths" (2024-10-25 06:26:09 +0900)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Revert patches causing inode collision problems
----------------------------------------------------------------
Dominique Martinet (4):
Revert " fs/9p: mitigate inode collisions"
Revert "fs/9p: remove redundant pointer v9ses"
Revert "fs/9p: fix uaf in in v9fs_stat2inode_dotl"
Revert "fs/9p: simplify iget to remove unnecessary paths"
fs/9p/v9fs.h | 34 +++++++++++++++----
fs/9p/v9fs_vfs.h | 2 +-
fs/9p/vfs_inode.c | 129 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
fs/9p/vfs_super.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
next reply other threads:[~2024-10-25 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-25 21:36 Dominique Martinet [this message]
2024-10-25 22:59 ` [GIT PULL] more 9p reverts for 6.12-rc5 pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZxwPQTUCnbGEt1KQ@codewreck.org \
--to=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox