From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from submarine.notk.org (submarine.notk.org [62.210.214.84]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0616B29B228 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 21:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.210.214.84 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760995973; cv=none; b=ObKzI0C6HLnhCQo34dSVNwwD59nlv7gXyPtV/jnUBKkc3GtKigcnWx9BfTi+N/sgZGD44INUpeFzyRblK4kc08UZaFtBAeXw7VRR+1DH5XEKbmkJNnBj8kMzSo2+Zi2yjfAhntHCxp3vaknYhKlP+YuNdlQG2B42qVJZMWRmsCk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760995973; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eHrECkEM63rtKZMGjxIdCIgrX3X5T3yvP2VGN/8TBC8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=u3yy/YgQpqLij9S0atCNTBqDTEybOqDsoIHKfZcdi6c4g7wUKghLhyDzLXBjHp7lUZTvPhxTEmmsxrl6qZBG60IEmAL6CR6dz3bCnBZwFW+gLXbElQ2a4QU0kkJkSaC2s2On3fZM/GIfBenEmymVSJgMf5ewN+R8wM2Ze7rzU0E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codewreck.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codewreck.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codewreck.org header.i=@codewreck.org header.b=Ul3eNP2H; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.210.214.84 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codewreck.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codewreck.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codewreck.org header.i=@codewreck.org header.b="Ul3eNP2H" Received: from gaia.codewreck.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submarine.notk.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1F9814C2D3; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 23:32:38 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1760995961; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4ZjkqLkuqKJhoX3v2GjdOYI+aXyKqxwW3WOtRg6xSvU=; b=Ul3eNP2HUSrgqCNdGr1xlu9nSwOnNir9p8ZdumPy4C0v0LOOlyPtR5i0GmIUqo1zQxaOMD FOfWI+0kT8djgZa95A5qUqlA8RQAv+UZgZMwPEikLFp3w5UR64Hl//xLVqC211CCLU7f07 gT6Nei35etr0hPLVWvuc2me0EzBs3svFUP6nf9wNl55tpytqsR6GbHiwB3XWsbfzgX695G l1wYWN67EKn+9F/+jU5lhAQXPOHKlJiYC1wy2KRCKsOr23DlldOipUU1qPsw15OLNpl3CY KJik/WzVx4V+xXQmOU2B5ONCjIsJV3eueYqywKP+cuNzqRqdbrle1to48YR/PQ== Received: from localhost (gaia.codewreck.org [local]) by gaia.codewreck.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id ab0b83ce; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 21:32:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 06:32:22 +0900 From: Dominique Martinet To: Song Liu Cc: Tingmao Wang , v9fs@lists.linux.dev, Eric Van Hensbergen , Latchesar Ionkov , Christian Schoenebeck , =?utf-8?Q?Micka=C3=ABl_Sala=C3=BCn?= , bpf Subject: Re: 9P change breaks bpftrace running in qemu+9p? Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: v9fs@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Song Liu wrote on Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 12:40:23PM -0700: > I am running qemu 9.2.0 and bpftrace v0.24.0. I don't think anything is > very special here. I don't reproduce either (qemu 9.2.4 and bpftrace v0.24.1, I even went and installed vmtest to make sure), trying both my branch and a pristine v6.18-rc2 kernel -- what's the exact commit you're testing and could you attach your .config ? Thanks, -- Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus