From: "Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@amd.com>
To: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>,
"mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>,
"cohuck@redhat.com" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: "virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev" <virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev>,
"Ray.Huang@amd.com" <Ray.Huang@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] virtio: introduce SUSPEND and RESUME feature
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 21:25:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <092e01c6-1756-4293-8183-8efea6720548@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY8PR12MB71959BD1BFE6319F6E05A7FDDC7AA@CY8PR12MB7195.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8766 bytes --]
On 6/26/2025 7:59 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
>> From: Zhu Lingshan<lingshan.zhu@amd.com>
>> Sent: 23 June 2025 02:07 PM
>>
>> This commit allows the driver to suspend the device through a new device
>> status bit SUSPEND and resume the device running by re-setting DRIVER_OK
>> bit in device status.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan<lingshan.zhu@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang<jasowang@redhat.com>
>> Fixes:
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith
>> ub.com%2Foasis-tcs%2Fvirtio-
>> spec%2Fissues%2F229&data=05%7C02%7Cparav%40nvidia.com%7C3085ab
>> 378f264b5c845808ddb2313478%7C43083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17
>> a%7C0%7C0%7C638862646595099882%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8e
>> yJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIj
>> oiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Pf2ub%2FwVzdmf
>> A1JjScOJ7D%2B%2BNea9XgVFYdvvDQxym40%3D&reserved=0
>> ---
>> content.tex | 59
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
>> index 2e8da46..c987334c 100644
>> --- a/content.tex
>> +++ b/content.tex
>> @@ -42,6 +42,9 @@ \section{\field{Device Status} Field}\label{sec:Basic
>> Facilities of a Virtio Dev \item[FEATURES_OK (8)] Indicates that the driver has
>> acknowledged all the
>> features it understands, and feature negotiation is complete.
>>
>> +\item[SUSPEND (16)] When VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND is negotiated, indicates that
>> +the
>> + device has been suspended by the driver.
>> +
>> \item[DEVICE_NEEDS_RESET (64)] Indicates that the device has experienced
>> an error from which it can't recover.
>>
>> @@ -99,10 +102,10 @@ \section{Feature Bits}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a
>> Virtio Device / Feature B \begin{description}
>> \item[0 to 23, and 50 to 127] Feature bits for the specific device type
>>
>> -\item[24 to 42] Feature bits reserved for extensions to the queue and
>> +\item[24 to 43] Feature bits reserved for extensions to the queue and
>> feature negotiation mechanisms, see \ref{sec:Reserved Feature Bits}
>>
> Ignoring this delta as the fix of patch-2 will change this.
>
>> -\item[43 to 49, and 128 and above] Feature bits reserved for future
>> extensions.
>> +\item[44 to 49, and 128 and above] Feature bits reserved for future
>> extensions.
>> \end{description}
>>
>> \begin{note}
>> @@ -629,6 +632,54 @@ \section{Device Cleanup}\label{sec:General
>> Initialization And Device Operation /
>>
>> Thus a driver MUST ensure a virtqueue isn't live (by device reset) before
>> removing exposed buffers.
>>
>> +\section{Device Suspend}\label{sec:General Initialization And Device
>> +Operation / Device Suspend}
>> +
>> +If VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND is negotiated, the driver is eligible to suspend the
>> device by setting the SUSPEND bit in \field{device status} to 1, and the device
>> SHOULD set the DRIVER_OK bit to 0 once it has been suspended.
>> +
> You ignored the inputs.
> I do not agree to add the "SHOULD" normative wording in the general description area.
> The reasoning is explained already.
> Please adapt to the existing style of this spec to keep the normative in requirements section.
>
> If VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND is negotiated, the driver is eligible to suspend the
> device by setting the SUSPEND bit in \field{device status} to 1, and the device
> sets the DRIVER_OK bit to 0 once it has been suspended.
>
> Is this really that hard to write above way?
I believe you totally ignored my replies in the last thread.
There are no rules forbid using "SHOULD" in any non-normative sections.
Now here I copy the reply here again:
In the spec section 1.3 Terminology, it says:
The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “NOT RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] and [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
RFC 2119 says:
SHOULD This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there
may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a
particular item, but the full implications must be understood and
carefully weighed before choosing a different course.
Here this "SHOULD" exactly conforms to the definition.
"SHOULD" has already been used in non-normative sections, for example:
2.5.4 Legacy Interfaces: when using the legacy interface, drivers SHOULD read these fields multiple times until two reads generate a consistent result.
The spec does not say: “SHOULD” can only be used in driver or device requirements section.
@MST, we need your input
>
>> +If the device has been suspended, the driver can resume the device running
>> by setting the DRIVER_OK bit in \field{device status} to 1, and the device
>> should set the SUSPEND bit to 0 once it resumes running.
>> +
> Similarly,
>
> If the device has been suspended, the driver can resume the device running
> by setting the DRIVER_OK bit in \field{device status} to 1, and the device
> sets the SUSPEND bit to 0 once it resumes running.
same as above
>
>
>> +\drivernormative{\subsection}{Device Suspend}{General Initialization
>> +And Device Operation / Device Suspend}
>> +
>> +The driver SHOULD NOT set SUSPEND bit if DRIVER_OK is not set or
>> VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND is not negotiated.
>> +
>> +Once the driver sets SUSPEND bit in \field{device status} to 1:
>> +\begin{itemize}
>> +\item The driver MUST verify whether the device has been suspended by re-
>> reading \field{device status}, examining whether the SUSPEND bit is set to 1
>> and the DRIVER_OK bit is set to 0.
>> +\item The driver MUST NOT make any more buffers available to the device.
>> +\item The driver MUST NOT send notifications for any virtqueues.
>> +\item The driver MUST NOT make any changes to Device Configuration Space
>> except for \field{device status} if it is part of the Configuration Space.
>> +\end{itemize}
>> +
>> +\devicenormative{\subsection}{Device Suspend}{General Initialization
>> +And Device Operation / Device Suspend}
>> +
>> +The device MUST ignore any operations on the SUSPEND bit from the
>> +driver if the device has not been completely initialized by the
>> +procedures in \ref{sec:General Initialization And Device Operation /
>> +Device Initialization}
>> +
>> +The device SHOULD ignore any write access to its Configuration Space
>> +while suspended, except for \field{device status} if it is part of the
>> Configuration Space.
>> +
>> +A device MUST NOT send any notifications for any virtqueues, access any
>> +virtqueues, or modify any fields in its Configuration Space while
>> +suspended.
>> +
>> +If changes occur in the Configuration Space during suspended period,
>> +the device MUST NOT send any configuration change notifications.
>> +Instead, the device MUST send the notification when it resumes running.
>> +
>> +If the driver sets the SUSPEND bit in \field{device status} to 1, the
>> +device MUST either suspend itself or set the DEVICE_NEEDS_RESET bit in
>> \field{device status} to 1 when it fails to suspend.
>> +
>> +If the device has been suspended and the driver resumes the device
>> +running by setting the DRIVER_OK bit in \field{device status} to 1, the device
>> MUST either resume normal operation or set the DEVICE_NEEDS_RESET bit in
>> \field{device status} to 1 when it fails to resume.
>> +
>> +When the driver sets the SUSPEND bit to 1, the device SHOULD perform
>> +the following actions before presenting the SUSPEND bit as 1 and DRIVER_OK
>> bit as 0 in the \field{device status}:
>> +
>> +\begin{itemize}
>> +\item Stop consuming more buffers of any virtqueues.
>> +\item Wait until all buffers that are being processed have been used.
>> +\item Send used buffer notifications to the driver.
>> +\end{itemize}
>> +
>> \chapter{Virtio Transport Options}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options}
>>
>> Virtio can use various different buses, thus the standard is split @@ -872,6
>> +923,10 @@ \chapter{Reserved Feature Bits}\label{sec:Reserved Feature Bits}
>> \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Feature Bits}
>> for
>> handling features reserved for future use.
>>
>> + \item[VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND(43)] This feature indicates that the driver can
>> + suspend the device by set the SUSPEND bit to 1.
>> + See \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Device Status Field}.
>> +
>> \end{description}
>>
>> \drivernormative{\section}{Reserved Feature Bits}{Reserved Feature Bits}
>> --
>> 2.49.0
>>
> Rest of the requirements and description looks good to me.
>
> Can you please fix these 2 small things in the general description and patch-2?
patch-2 can be fixed for sure
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 10279 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-26 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-23 8:36 [PATCH v3 0/3] Implement virtio SUSPEND and RESUME feature Zhu Lingshan
2025-06-23 8:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] virtio: re-order device status bits Zhu Lingshan
2025-06-26 11:39 ` Parav Pandit
2025-06-23 8:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] virtio: document feature bit 42 Zhu Lingshan
2025-06-26 11:45 ` Parav Pandit
2025-06-26 13:06 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2025-06-23 8:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] virtio: introduce SUSPEND and RESUME feature Zhu Lingshan
2025-06-26 11:59 ` Parav Pandit
2025-06-26 13:25 ` Zhu, Lingshan [this message]
2025-06-26 13:40 ` Parav Pandit
2025-06-27 1:57 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2025-06-26 15:42 ` Cornelia Huck
2025-06-26 16:01 ` Parav Pandit
2025-06-27 1:46 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2025-06-27 8:27 ` Cornelia Huck
2025-06-27 11:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-06-27 4:33 ` Parav Pandit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=092e01c6-1756-4293-8183-8efea6720548@amd.com \
--to=lingshan.zhu@amd.com \
--cc=Ray.Huang@amd.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox