From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Vitaly Mireyno <vmireyno@marvell.com>
Cc: "virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org"
<virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Subject: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH] virtio-net: Add an optional device control over the receive buffers length
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 05:35:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200105052836-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR1801MB2067B366EB434CD282F6589BC5270@BN6PR1801MB2067.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 01:59:17PM +0000, Vitaly Mireyno wrote:
> This patch gives devices some level of control over the receive buffers length.
> The driver declares the minimum receive buffer length, and the device requests max/min buffer length ratio.
> This is a follow-up to the "[PATCH] virtio-net: Add equal-sized receive buffers feature" discussion: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/201912/msg00007.html
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Mireyno <vmireyno@marvell.com>
> ---
> content.tex | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index d68cfaf..0a4cfba 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -2815,6 +2815,13 @@ \subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Feature bits
> \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR(23)] Set MAC address through control
> channel.
>
> +\item[VIRTIO_NET_F_RXBUF_LEN_RATIO(57)] Device requests to limit the
> + maximum/minimum receive buffers length ratio.
> +
So VIRTIO_NET_F_RXBUF_LEN_RATIO only makes sense with
VIRTIO_NET_F_RXBUF_MIN_LEN, right? I think we can just use a single
feature bit then, and just set ratio to 0 to mean "infinity".
> +\item[VIRTIO_NET_F_RXBUF_MIN_LEN(58)] Device requests to know the minimum
> + receive buffers length. Driver declares the minimum receive buffers
> + length.
> +
> \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_HDRLEN(59)] Driver can provide the exact \field{hdr_len}
> value. Device benefits from knowing the exact header length.
>
> @@ -2861,8 +2868,8 @@ \subsubsection{Legacy Interface: Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / Network
> \subsection{Device configuration layout}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Device configuration layout}
> \label{sec:Device Types / Block Device / Feature bits / Device configuration layout}
>
> -Three driver-read-only configuration fields are currently defined. The \field{mac} address field
> -always exists (though is only valid if VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC is set), and
> +The driver-read-only \field{mac} address field always exists
> +(though is only valid if VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC is set), and
> \field{status} only exists if VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS is set. Two
> read-only bits (for the driver) are currently defined for the status field:
> VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP and VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE.
> @@ -2882,12 +2889,22 @@ \subsection{Device configuration layout}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device
> VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is set. This field specifies the maximum MTU for the driver to
> use.
>
> +The device-read-only field \field{min_rx_buf_len} only exists if
> +VIRTIO_NET_F_RXBUF_MIN_LEN is set. This field specifies the minimum receive
> +buffers length.
> +
> +The driver-read-only field \field{rx_buf_len_ratio} only exists if
> +VIRTIO_NET_F_RXBUF_LEN_RATIO is set. This field specifies the maximum/minimum receive
> +buffers length ratio.
Actually shouldn't all of these always exist and only be valid
if a flag is set? I think existing text should be fixed too.
> +
> \begin{lstlisting}
> struct virtio_net_config {
> u8 mac[6];
> le16 status;
> le16 max_virtqueue_pairs;
> le16 mtu;
> + le32 min_rx_buf_len;
> + le16 rx_buf_len_ratio;
> };
> \end{lstlisting}
>
> @@ -2916,6 +2933,15 @@ \subsection{Device configuration layout}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device
> If the driver negotiates the VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature, the device MAY act
> as a standby device for a primary device with the same MAC address.
>
> +A driver SHOULD accept the VIRTIO_NET_F_RXBUF_MIN_LEN feature if offered.
> +
> +If VIRTIO_NET_F_RXBUF_MIN_LEN feature has been negotiated, the driver MUST
> +set \field{min_rx_buf_len}.
> +
> +A driver MUST NOT modify \field{min_rx_buf_len} once it has been set.
> +
> +A driver SHOULD accept the VIRTIO_NET_F_RXBUF_LEN_RATIO feature if offered.
> +
> \drivernormative{\subsubsection}{Device configuration layout}{Device Types / Network Device / Device configuration layout}
>
> A driver SHOULD negotiate VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC if the device offers it.
> @@ -3281,6 +3307,17 @@ \subsubsection{Setting Up Receive Buffers}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Devi
> If VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ is negotiated, each of receiveq1\ldots receiveqN
> that will be used SHOULD be populated with receive buffers.
>
> +If VIRTIO_NET_F_RXBUF_MIN_LEN feature has been negotiated, the driver
> +MUST initialize all receive virtqueue descriptors \field{len} field with
> +the value greater than or equal to the value configured in the
> +\field{min_rx_buf_len} device configuration field, and allocate receive
> +buffers accordingly.
I think above should talk about buffer length, discussion about
descriptors doesn't belong in devices, it's a way to describe buffers.
If we want to limit descriptors per rx buffer, I think it's a
separate feature similar to max_sg for blk/scsi.
> +If VIRTIO_NET_F_RXBUF_LEN_RATIO feature has been negotiated, the driver
> +MUST initialize all receive virtqueue descriptors \field{len} field with
> +the value less than or equal to (\field{min_rx_buf_len} * \field{rx_buf_len_ratio}),
> +and allocate receive buffers accordingly.
> +
> \devicenormative{\paragraph}{Setting Up Receive Buffers}{Device Types / Network Device / Device Operation / Setting Up Receive Buffers}
>
> The device MUST set \field{num_buffers} to the number of descriptors used to
> --
This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.
In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.
Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-05 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-30 13:59 [virtio-comment] [PATCH] virtio-net: Add an optional device control over the receive buffers length Vitaly Mireyno
2020-01-03 15:22 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-01-05 10:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-05 10:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2020-01-20 16:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-22 16:06 ` [virtio-comment] RE: [EXT] " Vitaly Mireyno
2020-01-23 6:55 ` [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-23 7:10 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-23 7:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-23 10:00 ` Jason Wang
2020-01-23 12:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-01-06 15:13 [virtio-comment] " Vitaly Mireyno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200105052836-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=vmireyno@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox