From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Vitaly Mireyno <vmireyno@marvell.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org"
<virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>,
Ariel Elior <aelior@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH v3] virtio-net: Add support for the flexible driver notification structure
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:10:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200226120948-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR1801MB20670FFA71429EEB721E8053C5EA0@BN6PR1801MB2067.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 02:54:36PM +0000, Vitaly Mireyno wrote:
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> >Sent: Wednesday, 26 February, 2020 5:13
> >To: Vitaly Mireyno <vmireyno@marvell.com>; virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
> >Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>; Ariel Elior <aelior@marvell.com>
> >Subject: [EXT] Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH v3] virtio-net: Add support for the flexible driver
> >notification structure
> >
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >On 2020/2/26 上午12:30, Vitaly Mireyno wrote:
> >> Currently, the driver notification (available buffer notification) has a fixed structure.
> >> If VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has been negotiated, it includes: vqn, next_off and next_wrap.
> >> If notify_off_multiplier > 0, the VQ number can be derived by the device from the Queue Notify
> >address, so vqn may be redundant.
> >>
> >> Some devices benefit from receiving an additional data with driver notifications. This data can
> >optionally replace the vqn field in the driver notification structure.
> >> In its simplest form, it would be sufficient for this data to be a per-device constant value.
> >>
> >> Changes from v2 - Defined a new feature flag instead of a PCI-specific flag.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Mireyno <vmireyno@marvell.com>
> >> ---
> >> content.tex | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex index b91a132..5223d5c 100644
> >> --- a/content.tex
> >> +++ b/content.tex
> >> @@ -965,6 +965,8 @@ \subsubsection{Notification structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
> >Options
> >> struct virtio_pci_notify_cap {
> >> struct virtio_pci_cap cap;
> >> le32 notify_off_multiplier; /* Multiplier for
> >> queue_notify_off. */
> >> + le16 notify_data; /* Data to be placed in the vqn field */
> >> + le16 padding; /* Pad to a dword */
> >> };
> >> \end{lstlisting}
> >>
> >> @@ -984,6 +986,21 @@ \subsubsection{Notification structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
> >Options
> >> the same Queue Notify address for all queues.
> >> \end{note}
> >>
> >> +\field{notify_data} is the data that the driver will set in the
> >> +\field{vqn} field in the available buffer notification, if
> >> +VIRTIO_NET_F_NOTIF_EXTRA_DATA has been negotiated.
> >> +
> >> +\begin{note}
> >> +If \field{notify_off_multiplier} > 0, the virtqueue number can
> >> +potentially be derived by the device from the Queue Notify address,
> >> +so \field{vqn} may be redundant. Some devices benefit from receiving
> >> +the additional data with driver notifications. An example could be a
> >> +hardware device implementing multiple protocols (with virtio being
> >> +one of them), so extra notification data could serve as a notification type indication or a protocol
> >indication.
> >> +Another example could be using shared hardware memory space for
> >> +driver notifications for multiple virtio devices in a trusted environment.
> >> +\end{note}
> >> +
> >> \devicenormative{\paragraph}{Notification capability}{Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus
> >/ PCI Device Layout / Notification capability}
> >> The device MUST present at least one notification capability.
> >>
> >> @@ -1020,6 +1037,10 @@ \subsubsection{Notification structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
> >Options
> >> cap.length >= queue_notify_off * notify_off_multiplier + 4
> >> \end{lstlisting}
> >>
> >> +If VIRTIO_NET_F_NOTIF_EXTRA_DATA has been negotiated, the device MUST
> >> +set \field{notify_data} to a valid value, and SHOULD set
> >> +\field{notify_off_multiplier} > 0.
> >> +
> >> \subsubsection{ISR status capability}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
> >> Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / ISR status
> >> capability}
> >>
> >> The VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_ISR_CFG capability @@ -1519,6 +1540,14 @@
> >> \subsubsection{Available Buffer Notifications}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Option
> >> See \ref{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / Notification
> >capability}
> >> for how to calculate the Queue Notify address.
> >>
> >> +\drivernormative{\paragraph}{Available Buffer Notifications}{Virtio
> >> +Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Initialization
> >> +And Device Operation / Available Buffer Notifications} The driver SHOULD accept the
> >VIRTIO_NET_F_NOTIF_EXTRA_DATA feature if it has been offered.
> >
> >
> >I think we need use "MUST" here?
> >
>
> Wouldn’t it break the existing drivers then?
I agree, we can't declare existing drivers non-conformant by fiat.
Certainly not for a boutique feature like this.
>
> >Other looks good to me.
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >
> >> +
> >> +If VIRTIO_NET_F_NOTIF_EXTRA_DATA has been negotiated, the driver MUST
> >> +set the \field{vqn} field of the available buffer notification
> >> +structure to the \field{notify_data} value.
> >> +
> >> \subsubsection{Used Buffer Notifications}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
> >> Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Initialization And Device
> >> Operation / Used Buffer Notifications}
> >>
> >> If a used buffer notification is necessary for a virtqueue, the device would typically act as follows:
> >> @@ -2895,6 +2924,10 @@ \subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device /
> >Feature bits
> >> \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR(23)] Set MAC address through control
> >> channel.
> >>
> >> +\item[VIRTIO_NET_F_NOTIF_EXTRA_DATA(57)] Driver provides an extra data with
> >> + available buffer notifications, to aid in notification processing by the
> >> + device.
> >> +
> >> \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_HDRLEN(59)] Driver can provide the exact \field{hdr_len}
> >> value. Device benefits from knowing the exact header length.
> >>
> >> @@ -2934,6 +2967,7 @@ \subsubsection{Feature bit requirements}\label{sec:Device Types /
> >Network Device
> >> \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR] Requires VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ.
> >> \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_RSC_EXT] Requires VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO4 or
> >VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO6.
> >> \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS] Requires VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ.
> >> +\item[VIRTIO_NET_F_NOTIF_EXTRA_DATA] Requires VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA.
> >> \end{description}
> >>
> >> \subsubsection{Legacy Interface: Feature bits}\label{sec:Device
> >> Types / Network Device / Feature bits / Legacy Interface: Feature
> >> bits}
> >> --
> >>
> >> This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
> >> OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.
> >>
> >> In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and to
> >> minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required before
> >> posting.
> >>
> >> Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> >> Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> >> List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> >> List archive:
> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.oasis-2Dope
> >> n.org_archives_virtio-2Dcomment_&d=DwIFaQ&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=l
> >> DHJ2FW52oJ3lqqsArgFRdcevq01tbLQAw4A_NO7xgI&m=94BRvyqIARqVJ-yydsIqG25_z
> >> AUHjeENww-NxeMs_s8&s=fspKS4uA_CyM-S4HrR6GdJbvttjkX5iCygZvcybe_qs&e=
> >> Feedback License:
> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.oasis-2Dopen.
> >> org_who_ipr_feedback-5Flicense.pdf&d=DwIFaQ&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r
> >> =lDHJ2FW52oJ3lqqsArgFRdcevq01tbLQAw4A_NO7xgI&m=94BRvyqIARqVJ-yydsIqG25
> >> _zAUHjeENww-NxeMs_s8&s=sskV_Q0nV6odmu9tb3_QO4sJgxQQfA7SDNkDbhCPgZ0&e=
> >> List Guidelines:
> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.oasis-2Dopen.
> >> org_policies-2Dguidelines_mailing-2Dlists&d=DwIFaQ&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz
> >> 7xtfQ&r=lDHJ2FW52oJ3lqqsArgFRdcevq01tbLQAw4A_NO7xgI&m=94BRvyqIARqVJ-yy
> >> dsIqG25_zAUHjeENww-NxeMs_s8&s=0FDuoPUSirLgEwBf7ATkyVMaalFeB6N0-vhpOnkB
> >> vWY&e=
> >> Committee:
> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.oasis-2Dopen.
> >> org_committees_virtio_&d=DwIFaQ&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=lDHJ2FW52oJ
> >> 3lqqsArgFRdcevq01tbLQAw4A_NO7xgI&m=94BRvyqIARqVJ-yydsIqG25_zAUHjeENww-
> >> NxeMs_s8&s=raC15yZMnr9y9Iv5_woorP7Bq2OQiO-uybPhgqzNtlE&e=
> >> Join OASIS:
> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.oasis-2Dopen.
> >> org_join_&d=DwIFaQ&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=lDHJ2FW52oJ3lqqsArgFRdce
> >> vq01tbLQAw4A_NO7xgI&m=94BRvyqIARqVJ-yydsIqG25_zAUHjeENww-NxeMs_s8&s=Gw
> >> VYWNwNZr7MFb5jJ7acLULJni1uMlwLgWBgiTSrp74&e=
> >>
>
This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.
In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.
Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-26 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-26 14:54 [virtio-comment] [PATCH v3] virtio-net: Add support for the flexible driver notification structure Vitaly Mireyno
2020-02-26 17:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2020-02-27 10:05 ` Jason Wang
2020-02-27 10:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-27 10:20 ` Jason Wang
2020-03-03 14:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-03-11 7:09 Vitaly Mireyno
2020-03-05 17:16 Vitaly Mireyno
2020-03-05 20:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-03-03 14:42 Vitaly Mireyno
2020-02-25 16:30 Vitaly Mireyno
2020-02-26 3:12 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200226120948-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=aelior@marvell.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=vmireyno@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox