From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Vitaly Mireyno <vmireyno@marvell.com>
Cc: "virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org"
<virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
Ariel Elior <aelior@marvell.com>
Subject: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH v5] virtio-net: Add support for the flexible driver notification structure
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:04:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200311165611-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR1801MB2067993A8BB5520AEEC18D66C5FF0@BN6PR1801MB2067.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 08:42:14AM +0000, Vitaly Mireyno wrote:
> Currently, the driver notification (available buffer notification) has a fixed structure.
> If VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has been negotiated, it includes: vqn, next_off and next_wrap.
> If notify_off_multiplier > 0, the VQ number can be derived by the device from the Queue Notify address, so vqn may be redundant.
>
> Some devices benefit from receiving an additional data with driver notifications. This data can optionally replace the vqn field in the driver notification structure.
> In its simplest form, it would be sufficient for this data to be a per-device constant value.
>
> Changes from v4 - articles fix-up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Mireyno <vmireyno@marvell.com>
> ---
> content.tex | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index b91a132..08e6111 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -965,6 +965,8 @@ \subsubsection{Notification structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options
> struct virtio_pci_notify_cap {
> struct virtio_pci_cap cap;
> le32 notify_off_multiplier; /* Multiplier for queue_notify_off. */
> + le16 notify_data; /* Data to be placed in the vqn field */
> + le16 padding; /* Pad to a dword */
> };
> \end{lstlisting}
>
> @@ -984,6 +986,21 @@ \subsubsection{Notification structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options
> the same Queue Notify address for all queues.
> \end{note}
>
> +\field{notify_data} is the data that the driver will set in the \field{vqn}
> +field in the available buffer notification, if
> +VIRTIO_NET_F_NOTIF_EXTRA_DATA has been negotiated.
> +
> +\begin{note}
> +If \field{notify_off_multiplier} > 0, the virtqueue number can potentially be
> +derived by the device from the Queue Notify address, so \field{vqn} may be
> +redundant. Some devices benefit from receiving additional data with driver
> +notifications. An example could be a hardware device implementing multiple
> +protocols (with virtio being one of them), so the extra notification data could
> +serve as a notification type indication or a protocol indication.
> +Another example could be using shared hardware memory space for driver
> +notifications for multiple virtio devices in a trusted environment.
Actually I missed this "in a trusted environment". This only works if
all drivers can trust each other. I don't think we should give examples
with security problems like this.
> +\end{note}
> +
> \devicenormative{\paragraph}{Notification capability}{Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / Notification capability}
> The device MUST present at least one notification capability.
>
> @@ -1020,6 +1037,9 @@ \subsubsection{Notification structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options
> cap.length >= queue_notify_off * notify_off_multiplier + 4
> \end{lstlisting}
>
> +If the device offers VIRTIO_NET_F_NOTIF_EXTRA_DATA, it MUST set
> +\field{notify_off_multiplier} > 0 in at least one capability.
> +
> \subsubsection{ISR status capability}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / ISR status capability}
>
> The VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_ISR_CFG capability
> @@ -1519,6 +1539,14 @@ \subsubsection{Available Buffer Notifications}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Option
> See \ref{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / Notification capability}
> for how to calculate the Queue Notify address.
>
> +\drivernormative{\paragraph}{Available Buffer Notifications}{Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Initialization And Device Operation / Available Buffer Notifications}
> +The driver SHOULD accept the VIRTIO_NET_F_NOTIF_EXTRA_DATA feature if it has
> +been offered.
> +
> +If VIRTIO_NET_F_NOTIF_EXTRA_DATA has been negotiated and
> +\field{notify_off_multiplier} > 0, the driver MUST set the \field{vqn} field of
> +the available buffer notification structure to the \field{notify_data} value.
> +
> \subsubsection{Used Buffer Notifications}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Initialization And Device Operation / Used Buffer Notifications}
>
> If a used buffer notification is necessary for a virtqueue, the device would typically act as follows:
> @@ -2895,6 +2923,10 @@ \subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Feature bits
> \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR(23)] Set MAC address through control
> channel.
>
> +\item[VIRTIO_NET_F_NOTIF_EXTRA_DATA(57)] Driver provides extra data with
> + available buffer notifications, to aid in notification processing by the
> + device.
> +
It's not a big deal but maybe "config data" would have been a better
name (since it's from config space).
> \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_HDRLEN(59)] Driver can provide the exact \field{hdr_len}
> value. Device benefits from knowing the exact header length.
>
> @@ -2934,6 +2966,7 @@ \subsubsection{Feature bit requirements}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device
> \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR] Requires VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ.
> \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_RSC_EXT] Requires VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO4 or VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO6.
> \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS] Requires VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ.
> +\item[VIRTIO_NET_F_NOTIF_EXTRA_DATA] Requires VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA.
Hmm I missed this too. Could you explain why is this dependency there?
> \end{description}
>
> \subsubsection{Legacy Interface: Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Feature bits / Legacy Interface: Feature bits}
> --
This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.
In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.
Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-11 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-10 8:42 [virtio-comment] [PATCH v5] virtio-net: Add support for the flexible driver notification structure Vitaly Mireyno
2020-03-11 17:43 ` Halil Pasic
2020-03-11 20:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-03-16 10:15 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-03-11 21:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-03-12 14:05 [virtio-comment] " Vitaly Mireyno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200311165611-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=aelior@marvell.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=vmireyno@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox