Re: [PATCH V5] virtio-transport: Clarify requirements

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 03:13:35PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 21-06-24, 05:39, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 03:02:03PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > On 11-06-24, 14:11, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > > On 11-06-24, 07:41, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > > > > Got it.
> > > > > I agree to Michael's suggestion "I feel a non-normative section is enough for this."
> > > > > So following his guidance, we should remove it from the requirements and have this as,
> > > > > 
> > > > > "implementation guide" or appendix section and it also looks good without the key wards too.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Otherwise, this requirement section becomes the example of how not to write normative in a normative section.
> > > > > (and we want to avoid future such examples).
> > > > 
> > > > I am okay with whatever Cornelia and Michael finalize on this.
> > > 
> > > Michael, Cornelia: Any decision on this ?
> > 
> > On what?
> 
> I am a bit confused about where exactly should we keep this section.
> As the current patch or appendix or somewhere else ?


Add a new chapter: "creating new transports" alongside newdevice.tex.

There, explain how to go about developing new transports.
Your text can be helpful there.

> -- 
> viresh