RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] VIRTIO_F_USED_EVENT_AUTO_DISABLE: add new used buffer notification suppression mechanism

Vamsi Krishna Attunuru
2024-11-06T11:11:16Z

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2024 10:03 AM
>To: Vamsi Krishna Attunuru <vattunuru@marvell.com>
>Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>; Lege Wang
><lege.wang@jaguarmicro.com>; virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev; Nithin
>Kumar Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>; parav@nvidia.com; Leo Liu
><leo.liu@jaguarmicro.com>; Angus Chen <angus.chen@jaguarmicro.com>
>Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH]
>VIRTIO_F_USED_EVENT_AUTO_DISABLE: add new used buffer notification
>suppression mechanism
>
>On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 12: 23 AM Vamsi Krishna Attunuru
><vattunuru@ marvell. com> wrote: > > Hi Wang, Michael, Jason, > > I wanted
>to follow up on the previous discussions regarding this new used buffer
>notification suppression.
>On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 12:23 AM Vamsi Krishna Attunuru
><vattunuru@marvell.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Wang, Michael, Jason,
>>
>> I wanted to follow up on the previous discussions regarding this new used
>buffer notification suppression.
>>
>> Since this proposal involves two changes, how about separating it out and
>explore the feasibilities to support interrupt coalescing with existing options.?
>> 1) Support pvirtq_event_suppress/virtq_avail in PCI bar
>> 2) Support used buffer notification coalescing
>>
>> Regards
>> Vamsi
>
>Maybe post a new RFC to see?

Sure, thanks.
>
>Thanks