Re: [PATCH] can: drop a broken conformance link

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 12:46:09PM +0200, Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 03:03:17PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > CAN device has a single device conformance section, drop
> > a link to a non-existent section, fixing a Latex error.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  device-types/can/device-conformance.tex | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/device-types/can/device-conformance.tex b/device-types/can/device-conformance.tex
> > index f944ffd..3725164 100644
> > --- a/device-types/can/device-conformance.tex
> > +++ b/device-types/can/device-conformance.tex
> > @@ -3,6 +3,5 @@
> >  A CAN device MUST conform to the following normative statements:
> >  
> >  \begin{itemize}
> > -\item \ref{devicenormative:Device Types / CAN Device / Feature bits}
> >  \item \ref{devicenormative:Device Types / CAN Device / Device Operation / CAN Message Transmission}
> >  \end{itemize}
> > -- 
> > MST
> > 
> > 
> 
> I wonder if authors just forgot the`\devicenormative{}` in 5.20.3
> section: `Device Requirements: Feature bits`. I added Harald in CC.
> 
> Matias

that section needs to be split up - it seems to list requirements
without saying who the requirement is for.
in fact device requirements here generally need work e.g. they specify
a structure of a request driver submits - that should be a driver
requirement or better moved to a non-conformance section.