From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@gmail.com>
Cc: "virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev" <virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: Should there be a mode in which the virtqueue -> MSI mapping is fixed?
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2026 17:09:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260405170510-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <700f6f7c-53d6-4023-9a5f-1296eacfff37@gmail.com>
On Sun, Apr 05, 2026 at 04:58:39PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 4/5/26 16:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 05, 2026 at 01:50:25PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> >> On 4/4/26 20:56, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Apr 04, 2026 at 05:19:41PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> >>>> Cloud Hypervisor's vhost-user frontend does not implement MSI-X
> >>>> properly [1]. Specifically:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. Reads from the Pending Bit Array (PBA) always return 0.
> >>>> 2. Changes to the MSI associated with a virtqueue after the device
> >>>> is activated are ignored.
> >>>>
> >>>> Amazingly, there have not been any reports of this causing breakage.
> >>>> I have a fix for the first [2], which actually decreases the amount
> >>>> of code. However, the second is trickier and I'm tempted to not
> >>>> bother unless it causes real-world problems.
> >>>>
> >>>> Are there real-world drivers that will run into either of the above
> >>>> bugs? Linux seems to only choose anything else as a fallback, which
> >>>> presumably is not triggered.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]: https://github.com/cloud-hypervisor/cloud-hypervisor/issues/7813
> >>>> [2]: https://github.com/cloud-hypervisor/cloud-hypervisor/pull/7963
> >>>
> >>> It will sometimes trigger.
> >>
> >> Would it be possible to provide an example? A reproducible test
> >> case would be ideal, but conditions under which this will trigger
> >> are also sufficient.
> >
> >
> > I am not sure what does "is activated" mean.
> > For example, on latest Linux:
> >
> > vq = vp_find_one_vq_msix(vdev, avq->vq_index, vp_modern_avq_done,
> > avq->name, false, true, &allocated_vectors,
> > vector_policy, &vp_dev->admin_vq.info);
> > if (IS_ERR(vq)) {
> > err = PTR_ERR(vq);
> > goto error_find;
> > }
> >
> > return 0;
> >
> > error_find:
> > vp_del_vqs(vdev);
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> >
> > And
> >
> > static void del_vq(struct virtio_pci_vq_info *info)
> > {
> > struct virtqueue *vq = info->vq;
> > struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vq->vdev);
> > struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev = &vp_dev->mdev;
> >
> > if (vp_dev->msix_enabled)
> > vp_modern_queue_vector(mdev, vq->index,
> > VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR);
> >
> > if (!mdev->notify_base)
> > pci_iounmap(mdev->pci_dev, (void __force __iomem *)vq->priv);
> >
> > vring_del_virtqueue(vq);
> > }
> >
> >
> > and this happens after feature negotiation.
> >
> > It's before device_ready, however.
>
> Are there drivers that will change virtqueue => MSI-X vector mappings
> after DRIVER_OK without an intervening reset? Cloud Hypervisor
> supports this for devices it implements internally, but it ignores
> such changes for vhost-user devices. Is this going to cause problems
> in practice?
Also yes.
For example, dpdk uses this during cleanup to block interrupts:
drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
int
virtio_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
{
struct virtio_hw *hw = dev->data->dev_private;
struct rte_eth_intr_conf *intr_conf = &dev->data->dev_conf.intr_conf;
PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "virtio_dev_close");
if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY)
return 0;
if (!hw->opened)
return 0;
hw->opened = 0;
/* reset the NIC */
if (dev->data->dev_flags & RTE_ETH_DEV_INTR_LSC)
VIRTIO_OPS(hw)->set_config_irq(hw, VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR);
if (intr_conf->rxq)
virtio_queues_unbind_intr(dev);
if (intr_conf->lsc || intr_conf->rxq) {
virtio_intr_disable(dev);
rte_intr_efd_disable(dev->intr_handle);
rte_intr_vec_list_free(dev->intr_handle);
}
virtio_reset(hw);
virtio_dev_free_mbufs(dev);
virtio_free_queues(hw);
virtio_free_rss(hw);
return VIRTIO_OPS(hw)->dev_close(hw);
}
>
> If device_ready is what sets DRIVER_OK, and the virtqueue => MSI-X
> vector mappings subsequently stay static until reset, then everything
> should work fine unless I misunderstood the Cloud Hypervisor code.
> >>>> One reason I am asking is that I am working on an updated
> >>>> virtio-vhost-user spec, which I've renamed vhost-guest. A vhost-guest
> >>>> device implements a vhost-user server, and requires one MSI for each
> >>>> virtqueue of _the device being implemented_. The existing spec
> >>>> allows the guest to select which MSIs are used, but that seems to
> >>>> be pointless additional complexity. A simpler option would be to
> >>>> hard-code the MSI assignments:
> >>>>
> >>>> - 0: Configuration change interrupt.
> >>>>
> >>>> - 1..N (inclusive): Queue interrupts for the N virtqueues provided
> >>>> by the vhost-guest device.
> >>>>
> >>>> - N+1..N+M (inclusive): Buffer availability interrupts for each of
> >>>> the M virtqueues that the driver is implementing.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> you can do this, and imply ask drivers to share msi vector values.
> >>
> >> Are there drivers that cannot do this? Is this the reason that the
> >> virtio spec allows using the same MSI for multiple virtqueues?
> >>
> >
> > No, it's because of the devices:
> > 1. it's easier for device to detect sharing when it's explicit,
> > rather than matching msi vectors which can change at any time at all.
> > 2. we thought it might be more portable to non pci transports.
>
> Makes sense! Thank you so much for your time and effort!
> --
> Sincerely,
> Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-05 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-04 21:19 Should there be a mode in which the virtqueue -> MSI mapping is fixed? Demi Marie Obenour
2026-04-05 0:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-05 17:50 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2026-04-05 20:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-05 20:58 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2026-04-05 21:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2026-04-05 21:47 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2026-04-05 21:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-05 22:28 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2026-04-06 9:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260405170510-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=demiobenour@gmail.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox