Discussion of the VIRTIO specification
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] content: clarify feature negotiation terminology and init sequence
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 09:38:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260427133818.GA218226@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05b081b9c5a3a904fda3e378ca3e91a2c9375c27.1776982968.git.mst@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1709 bytes --]

On Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 06:24:12PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Make several clarifications to the init sequence documentation:
> 
> The Linux virtio core (drivers/virtio/virtio.c) initializes devices
> as follows:
>   1. Intersect driver and device feature bits
>   2. finalize_features() - write accepted features to the device
>   3. drv->validate() - read config space, may clear feature bits
>      (e.g. virtio-net clears VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU if mtu < MIN_MTU,
>      balloon clears PAGE_POISON if guest does not init pages)
>   4. If validate changed any features, finalize_features() again
>   5. virtio_features_ok() - set FEATURES_OK, confirm with device
> 
> this allows the device to know which fields will be read:
> recommend this in the spec.
> 
> Legacy driver detection is specified using a mechanism that
> does not work on all transports. Make it clear that it's an
> example: what matters is that devices do detection in some way
> and are compatible with legacy drivers.
> 
> Define "negotiated" for features confirmed via FEATURES_OK.
> 
> "acknowledged" is used as a synonym for "accepted", but only in two
> places. Just use "accepted" consistently.
> 
> Spec describes multiple moving pieces then ends with "before accepting
> it" - vague, and is overloading "accept". Replace with a reference to
> FEATURES_OK.
> 
> Fixes: https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/241
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
> 
> changes:
> address review comments by Stefan
> 
>  content.tex | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-27 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-23 22:24 [PATCH v2] content: clarify feature negotiation terminology and init sequence Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-24 12:05 ` Albert Esteve
2026-04-24 12:16   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-27 13:38 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260427133818.GA218226@fedora \
    --to=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox