public inbox for virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@amd.com>
To: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>,
	"mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"cohuck@redhat.com" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: "virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev" <virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev>,
	"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	"David Stevens" <stevensd@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 v7] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 10:31:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47b314dc-d8a2-489e-a84d-6670c176675c@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <IA0PR12MB87133AC3C33E8D319194E361DC802@IA0PR12MB8713.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>



On 8/15/2024 5:34 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
>> From: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@amd.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2024 1:53 PM
>>
>> On 8/13/2024 2:55 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
>>>> From: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@amd.com>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2024 11:44 AM
>>>>
>>> I removed the unreachable intel email id as every single email is bouncing
>> from it.
>>> Please consider dropping that email from v8 as it will cause all reviewers
>> email to bounce.
>>>> On 8/13/2024 1:50 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
>>>>>> From: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@amd.com>
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2024 11:15 AM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/13/2024 12:42 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Lingshan, David,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@amd.com>
>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2024 5:05 PM
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This commit allows the driver to suspend the device by
>>>>>>>> introducing a new status bit SUSPEND in device_status.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This commit also introduce a new feature bit VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND
>>>>>>>> which indicating whether the device support SUSPEND.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@amd.com>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>  content.tex | 75
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>> ----
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Changes from V6:
>>>>>>>> - the device should hold its config interrupt while SUSPEND,  and
>>>>>>>> send config interrupt when the SUSPEND bit is cleared.
>>>>>>>> - while SUSPEND, the driver MUST NOT access Device Configuration
>>>>>>>> Space
>>>>>>>> - minor changes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Changes from V5:
>>>>>>>> - the device should present NEEDS_RESET if failed to suspend
>>>>>>>> - allow the driver access device status in the config space when
>>>>>>>>   suspended if it is implemented in config space.
>>>>>>>> - language improvements
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Changes from V4:
>>>>>>>> - re-order the device status bits section
>>>>>>>> - kick vqs --> notify vqs
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Changes from V3:
>>>>>>>> - allow the driver clearing the SUSPEND bit to resume the device.
>>>>>>>> - disallow access to config space while suspended.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex index 0a62dce..2d1bee8
>>>>>>>> 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/content.tex
>>>>>>>> +++ b/content.tex
>>>>>>>> @@ -36,19 +36,22 @@ \section{\field{Device Status}
>>>>>>>> Field}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Dev
>>>>>>>>      this bit.  For example, under Linux, drivers can be loadable modules.
>>>>>>>>    \end{note}
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -\item[FAILED (128)] Indicates that something went wrong in the
>>>>>>>> guest,
>>>>>>>> -  and it has given up on the device. This could be an internal
>>>>>>>> -  error, or the driver didn't like the device for some reason,
>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>> -  even a fatal error during device operation.
>>>>>>>> +\item[DRIVER_OK (4)] Indicates that the driver is set up and
>>>>>>>> +ready to
>>>>>>>> +  drive the device.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  \item[FEATURES_OK (8)] Indicates that the driver has
>>>>>>>> acknowledged all
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>    features it understands, and feature negotiation is complete.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -\item[DRIVER_OK (4)] Indicates that the driver is set up and
>>>>>>>> ready to
>>>>>>>> -  drive the device.
>>>>>>>> +\item[SUSPEND (16)] When VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND is negotiated,
>>>> indicates
>>>>>>>> +that the
>>>>>>>> +  device has been suspended by the driver.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  \item[DEVICE_NEEDS_RESET (64)] Indicates that the device has
>>>>>> experienced
>>>>>>>>    an error from which it can't recover.
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +\item[FAILED (128)] Indicates that something went wrong in the
>>>>>>>> +guest,
>>>>>>>> +  and it has given up on the device. This could be an internal
>>>>>>>> +  error, or the driver didn't like the device for some reason,
>>>>>>>> +or
>>>>>>>> +  even a fatal error during device operation.
>>>>>>>>  \end{description}
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  The \field{device status} field starts out as 0, and is
>>>>>>>> reinitialized to 0 by @@ -
>>>>>>>> 60,8 +63,9 @@ \section{\field{Device Status}
>>>>>>>> Field}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Dev  initialization
>>>>>>>> sequence specified in \ref{sec:General Initialization And Device
>>>>>>>> Operation / Device
>>>>>> Initialization}.
>>>>>>>> -The driver MUST NOT clear a
>>>>>>>> -\field{device status} bit.  If the driver sets the FAILED bit,
>>>>>>>> +The driver MUST NOT clear a \field{device status} bit other than
>>>>>>>> +SUSPEND except when setting \field{device status} to 0 as a
>>>>>>>> +transport-specific way to initiate a reset. If the driver sets
>>>>>>>> +the FAILED bit,
>>>>>>>>  the driver MUST later reset the device before attempting to re-
>>>> initialize.
>>>>>>>>  The driver SHOULD NOT rely on completion of operations of a @@
>>>>>>>> -99,10
>>>>>>>> +103,10 @@ \section{Feature Bits}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a
>>>>>>>> +Virtio Device
>>>>>>>> / Feature B  \begin{description}
>>>>>>>>  \item[0 to 23, and 50 to 127] Feature bits for the specific
>>>>>>>> device type
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -\item[24 to 41] Feature bits reserved for extensions to the
>>>>>>>> queue and
>>>>>>>> +\item[24 to 42] Feature bits reserved for extensions to the
>>>>>>>> +queue and
>>>>>>>>    feature negotiation mechanisms
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -\item[42 to 49, and 128 and above] Feature bits reserved for
>>>>>>>> future extensions.
>>>>>>>> +\item[43 to 49, and 128 and above] Feature bits reserved for
>>>>>>>> +future
>>>>>>>> extensions.
>>>>>>>>  \end{description}
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  \begin{note}
>>>>>>>> @@ -629,6 +633,53 @@ \section{Device Cleanup}\label{sec:General
>>>>>>>> Initialization And Device Operation /
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Thus a driver MUST ensure a virtqueue isn't live (by device
>>>>>>>> reset) before removing exposed buffers.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +\section{Device Suspend}\label{sec:General Initialization And
>>>>>>>> +Device Operation / Device Suspend}
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +When VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND is negotiated, the driver can set the
>>>>>>>> +SUSPEND bit in \field{device status} to suspend a device, and
>>>>>>>> +can clear the SUSPEND bit to resume a suspended device.
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +\drivernormative{\subsection}{Device Suspend}{General
>>>>>>>> +Initialization And Device Operation / Device Suspend}
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +The driver MUST NOT set SUSPEND if FEATURES_OK is not set or
>>>>>>>> VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND is not negotiated.
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +Once the driver sets SUSPEND to \field{device status} of the device:
>>>>>>>> +\begin{itemize}
>>>>>>>> +\item The driver MUST re-read \field{device status} to verify
>>>>>>>> +whether the
>>>>>>>> SUSPEND bit is set.
>>>>>>>> +\item The driver MUST NOT make any more buffers available to the
>>>>>> device.
>>>>>>>> +\item The driver MUST NOT access any virtqueues or send
>>>>>>>> +notifications for
>>>>>>>> any virtqueues.
>>>>>>>> +\item The driver MUST NOT access Device Configuration Space.
>>>>>>>> +\end{itemize}
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>> Hi Parva
>>>>>>> Do we agree that
>>>>>>> a. suspending a device is non frequent operation (in order of N
>>>>>> operations/sec, where N is roughly in range of 10 or 100) per device?
>>>>>> Ideally it should not be often in normal operations, but remember
>>>>>> we can not restrict the behaviors of the driver, so we must be able
>>>>>> to handle the scenario in which SUSPENDING is often.
>>>>> Sure. the intent is slow rate, but one can do at unexpected times.
>>>>> Do you agree?
>>>> I think we don't have an intention of the frequency in the spec.
>>> Sure.
>>>
>>>> The spec only provides generic mechanisms and interfaces.
>>> Sure.
>>>
>>>> Don't assume it(or driver wants it to be) would be often or not, that
>>>> depends on the driver.
>>> As you rightly said : it cannot be assumed.
>>> The driver will read the device status right after it wrote it. This typically is <
>> 50nsec of time.
>>> The suspend operation for a net device to store hundreds of queues, RSS
>> table, flow filters, takes plenty of time (at least more than 50nsec :) ).
>>> Similarly for the GPU to store some MBs of memory takes more than 50nsec
>> of time, for example to store in a file for a software-based GPU device.
>>> So a device cannot respond back suspend=true in next 50nsec time.
>> It's OK for the device to take longer time to respond, the driver simply re-reads
>> device status.
> Sure, the issue is, when the driver re-reads, the device must present suspend=false within 50nsec.
> (because device didn't suspend it yet).
>
> As I explained in previous email, this requires building special circuitry.
> Such circuitry can be avoided if the suspend interface is done slightly differently.
why there is a constraint condition of the time? Are there any similar constraining for other
states like RESET or DRIVER_OK? Don't assume any other states transitions are faster than
SUSPEND.
>
>>> More below.
>>>
>>>>>>> b. A software-based device may not always want to force VM_EXIT on
>>>>>>> read
>>>>>> and write on the device_status register?
>>>>>> Trap and Emulation is the basic of virtualization, and how to
>>>>>> pass-through a device is out of this spec.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, I didn't suggest to put such things in the spec.
>>>>> My question is, whether to trap and emulate or not is a choice of
>>>>> the
>>>> software.
>>>>> Do you agree?
>>>> The device emulator does not know anything about whether trapped or
>> not.
>>>> Trapping and Emulation is a hypervisor thing.
>>>>
>>>> If here "software" refers to the device emulator, then Yes, it is not
>>>> the emulator's decision. And the device should not be aware of
>>>> VM_EXIT & VM_ENTRY.
>>>>
>>> Right. So a software wants to implement device_status as pure MMIO
>> writes. (and not VM_EXIT).
>> This is not always true, there can be VM_EXIT of pure emulated devices.  
> I am not denying that VM_EXIT can/cannot be there.
> I am saying, the proposal forces VM_EXIT based approach in my understanding of this patch.
> If that is not true, may be can you please explain how this can be implemented without VM_EXIT?
>
> We should have an interface that can be done with and without VM_EXIT method at least for any new additions.
VM_EXIT is out of spec, it is a hypervisor and the processor thing.
In non-pass-through case, any register access are sensitive and will trigger VM_EXIT. Like RESET or DRIVER_OK needs
to access device_status, nothing different.
>
>> The
>> HW registers are sensitive resource and any access to them need to be trapped
>> and emulated.
> This does not apply to PCI PFs and VFs which are HW devices (mainly PFs).
> so this trap + emulation is narrow view that we better avoid.
This is how *basic* virtualization work, once access sensitive resource, trap it.
>
> If you think this is the way forward, you should put forward in patch as MUST requirement.
> and that does not look right to me.
> I hope you also don't mean to force this method to device implementations.
> Right?
Again, VM_EXIT is a hypervisor thing,  out of spec. Whether there is a VM_EXIT when setting SUSPEND totally
depends on the virtualization solution. And SUSPEND is nothing different from DRIVER_OK.

Means, if your virtualization needs to trap SUSPEND, it also needs to trap DRIVER_OK, and don't assume
DRIVER_OK is faster than SUSPEND.
>
>>> And prefer to returning SUSPEND=true at slow pace.
>>> This means, the device implementation cannot immediately return
>> suspend=true right after it was written.
>>> A MMIO read will read it back, as suspend=true.
>>>
>>> An alternative would be, to forward CPU loads and CPU stores to different
>> address.
>>> However, this does not work for the hw based devices.
>>>
>>> That means, PCI HW needs to return suspend=0, until the device is not
>> suspended.
>>> In this example, the device cannot build special circuitry to answer
>> suspend=true within 50nsec, or in other words building special circuitry to
>> return suspend=false is too complex for the slow operation.
>> why? The device can just not to change the value of the SUSPEND bit before it
>> has fully suspended.
> When driver wrote, it wrote suspend=true,
> And device returns suspend=false while suspend is ongoing, right?
> If yes, this is expensive because the device needs to operate within 50nsec or less to answer suspend=false.
>
> And even worst, it needs to suspend=true when unsuspending within 50nsec when resuming is ongoing.
again, there is not a 50nsec constraining and please take a reference of how DRIVER_OK work with virtualization. 
>
>>> If this understanding of burden is clear,
>>>
>>> The proposal is, can you please extend the interface such that,
>>>
>>> 1. driver writes suspend command.
>>> 2. driver reads suspend_status, and receives not_completed=(false). This is
>> the default value.
>>> 3. When the device completes suspend, it changes the polarity of
>> suspend_status=true.
>>> This has two main benefits:
>>> [A] This will enable software-based devices to write data to slow files and
>> does not have to force VM_EXITs.
>>> [B] It also enables hw based devices to not build special circuitry to answer
>> within 50nsec, which can get very complicated for tens or hundreds of PCI
>> PFs.
>> I think we have already discussed on this before in V5, and Jason has some
>> insightful comments
>>
> Unfortunately, not. His comment was that it is not specific to suspend.
> But here we are introducing a new interface and functionality that does not need to suffer or follow anything that may not be efficient.
>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/virtio-comment/20240612082055-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org/T/#mc817fc6ca12ff0bcbae62b43b6146a177ecf13a9
>>>> this is out of the spec anyway.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Zhu Lingshan
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Zhu Lingshan
>>>>>>>> +\devicenormative{\subsection}{Device Suspend}{General
>>>>>>>> +Initialization And Device Operation / Device Suspend}
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +The device MUST ignore SUSPEND if FEATURES_OK is not set or
>>>>>>>> VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND is not negotiated.
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +The device MUST ignore all access to its Configuration Space
>>>>>>>> +while suspended, except for \field{device status} if it is part
>>>>>>>> +of the Configuration
>>>>>>>> Space.
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +A device MUST NOT send any notifications for any virtqeuues,
>>>>>>>> +access any virtqueues, or modify any fields in its Configuration
>>>>>>>> +Space while suspended.
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +If changes occur in the Configuration Space while the SUSPEND
>>>>>>>> +bit is set, the device MUST NOT send any configuration change
>>>> notifications.
>>>>>>>> +Instead, the device MUST send the notification after the SUSPEND
>>>>>>>> +bit has
>>>>>>>> been cleared.
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +When the driver sets SUSPEND, the device MUST either suspend
>>>>>>>> +itself or set
>>>>>>>> DEVICE_NEEDS_RESET if failed to suspend.
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +If SUSPEND is set in \field{device status}, when the driver
>>>>>>>> +clears SUSPEND, the device MUST either resume normal operation
>>>>>>>> +or set
>>>>>>>> DEVICE_NEEDS_RESET.
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +When the driver sets SUSPEND,
>>>>>>>> +the device SHOULD perform the following actions before
>>>>>>>> +presenting that
>>>>>>>> the SUSPEND bit is set to 1 in the \field{device status}:
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +\begin{itemize}
>>>>>>>> +\item Stop processing more buffers of any virtqueues \item Wait
>>>>>>>> +until all buffers that are being processed have been used.
>>>>>>>> +\item Send used buffer notifications to the driver.
>>>>>>>> +\end{itemize}
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>  \chapter{Virtio Transport Options}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
>>>>>>>> Options}
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Virtio can use various different buses, thus the standard is
>>>>>>>> split @@ -872,6
>>>>>>>> +923,10 @@ \chapter{Reserved Feature Bits}\label{sec:Reserved
>>>>>>>> +Feature
>>>>>>>> Bits}
>>>>>>>>  	\ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device /
>>>>>>>> Feature Bits} for
>>>>>>>>  	handling features reserved for future use.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +  \item[VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND(42)] This feature indicates that the
>>>>>>>> + driver
>>>> can
>>>>>>>> +   trigger suspending the device via the SUSPEND flag
>>>>>>>> +   See \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Device Status Field}.
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>  \end{description}
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  \drivernormative{\section}{Reserved Feature Bits}{Reserved
>>>>>>>> Feature Bits}
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> 2.45.2
>>>>>>>>


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-30  2:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-01 11:35 [PATCH V7 v7] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status Zhu Lingshan
2024-08-13  4:42 ` Parav Pandit
2024-08-13  5:44   ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-08-13  5:50     ` Parav Pandit
2024-08-13  6:14       ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-08-13  6:55         ` Parav Pandit
2024-08-15  8:23           ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-08-15  9:34             ` Parav Pandit
2024-08-30  2:31               ` Zhu Lingshan [this message]
2024-08-30  3:02                 ` Parav Pandit
2024-09-03  9:05                   ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-09-03  9:45                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-03 10:09                       ` Parav Pandit
2024-09-03 10:35                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-03 10:37                           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-04  3:07                             ` Jason Wang
2024-09-04  4:02                               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-04  6:31                                 ` Jason Wang
2024-09-04  6:38                                   ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-09-04  6:46                                     ` Parav Pandit
2024-09-05  7:14                                       ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-09-05  7:16                                         ` Parav Pandit
2024-09-05  7:29                                           ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-09-05  7:35                                             ` Parav Pandit
2024-09-05  8:30                                               ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-09-05  8:41                                                 ` David Stevens
2024-09-06  1:53                                                   ` Parav Pandit
2024-09-05  7:17                                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-05  7:31                                           ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-09-05  7:34                                             ` Parav Pandit
2024-09-05  6:51                                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-05  7:12                                       ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-09-05  8:12                                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-05  9:09                                           ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-09-06  1:54                                             ` Parav Pandit
2024-09-05 23:51                                           ` Jason Wang
2024-09-11  3:52                                             ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-09-11 10:20                                             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-12  2:05                                               ` Jason Wang
2024-09-12  5:44                                                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-24  7:35                                                   ` Jason Wang
2024-09-24 23:05                                                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-25  3:47                                                       ` Jason Wang
2024-09-25 11:17                                                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-27  4:08                                                           ` Jason Wang
2024-09-29 17:55                                                             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-10-17  6:56                                                               ` Jason Wang
2024-09-03 10:28                     ` Parav Pandit
2024-09-05  7:20                       ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-08-15 10:45             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-08-30  2:32               ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-08-15 10:52           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-08-15 10:59             ` Parav Pandit
2024-08-15 15:07               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-08-17  5:19                 ` Parav Pandit
2024-08-30  2:37                 ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-08-30  3:10                   ` Parav Pandit
2024-09-03  8:51                     ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-09-03  8:55                       ` Parav Pandit
2024-09-03  9:36                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-05  7:27                         ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-09-24 23:07                           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-08-13  7:51   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-08-13  7:58     ` Parav Pandit
2024-08-13  8:03       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-08-13  8:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-08-15  9:12   ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-08-15 10:50     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-08-30  2:20       ` Zhu Lingshan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47b314dc-d8a2-489e-a84d-6670c176675c@amd.com \
    --to=lingshan.zhu@amd.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=parav@nvidia.com \
    --cc=stevensd@chromium.org \
    --cc=virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox