From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C37F1E3DD8 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 14:50:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737384637; cv=none; b=aF6TP4lDGDkEuBCFR4xITIPRa1m8qVlx3yhZxVTfY7KHcR1s8rOSTuQVSNQf92HFFRJJNIdFmC2BohVay8IfK9lW6lST/PlnU3xidzrvt9zV98JdaP6wkwEreTbt0/tB9NBQi227wO8SMwzJxyflRVlawS+XobW76ccnU3lA4y8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737384637; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1GZakQDi1wNdVKDdRJyahWz0F3WaPzsf8ayY/VQe88I=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qdR81A28JCGA/2f3w2xhhWj7BaLyvuhgQqRLmBu/sAwS+/GO1DLoVoH8r0okMqpCE/W1aG7QcD2W/8odtcE6MYgZre1KvbHW0Yk2KhqKZ+ijrrkG7AArjMr1AtiyLYLG5b4u6g2Ih58dymWo/g5mCgQaAzVsEa8Cq9H2+DtocHg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=UAIcNhUU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="UAIcNhUU" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1737384634; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=loIpuWdALnsTFMwodQ9vdnoeCh+SOFmkbSJWezwWt+c=; b=UAIcNhUUWebY0QBkONBYTmwAq2dpnHGBE6EyemE8e0Zt4nWRahGAwCWDpkkJBUpnpLX4NG vhYGPGHpZ0SsAFabT+t2qrV6UDFdPpJCP7jKpWd8V/beLJzqr8ijTdhcEr/lPvJya5/Dh6 LgsaxbXVXcDt33AIo+fBs5VzfGEsQP8= Received: from mx-prod-mc-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-606-3GEkecXqPxGXvJF1ayzPdQ-1; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 09:50:31 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 3GEkecXqPxGXvJF1ayzPdQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 3GEkecXqPxGXvJF1ayzPdQ Received: from mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E08AF1955DA0; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 14:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.67.24.38]) by mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23C4F1956053; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 14:50:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Cornelia Huck To: Parav Pandit , Paolo Abeni , "virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev" Cc: "maxime.coquelin@redhat.com" , Eelco Chaudron , Jason Wang , Stefano Garzarella , Willem de Bruijn , "kshankar@marvell.com" Subject: RE: [PATCH v11 3/4] virtio-net: define UDP tunnel segmentation offload feature In-Reply-To: Organization: "Red Hat GmbH, Sitz: Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 12, D-85630 Grasbrunn, Handelsregister: Amtsgericht =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=BCnchen=2C?= HRB 153243, =?utf-8?Q?Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer=3A?= Ryan Barnhart, Charles Cachera, Michael O'Neill, Amy Ross" References: <3e1c45071c8cf4efc7ca0ecc7b52a73c6bf983fe.1732699986.git.pabeni@redhat.com> <87ldv597rl.fsf@redhat.com> <87ikq98yod.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.38.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 15:50:21 +0100 Message-ID: <87cygh8rpu.fsf@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.40 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: pgzAlGXlKaSJfKRQMpuDQAxjCCFMLnSJtghlb5ilexs_1737384630 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain On Mon, Jan 20 2025, Parav Pandit wrote: >> From: Cornelia Huck >> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2025 5:50 PM >> Personally, I'd prefer to handle this in an "atomic" manner, i.e. making sure >> that no version ever has the wrong bit numbers... maybe if you did a fixup >> patch that changes the numbers, and commit these patches + the fixup all at >> once? Less churn than doing the respin and revote dance. >> > Here it is. > https://lore.kernel.org/virtio-comment/20250120141052.877355-1-parav@nvidia.com/T/#u > > Do we need to open a new voting request for it? yes? I guess if you get an ack by the patchset author you could do it as an editorial update? Michael?