From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@amd.com>, mst@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com
Cc: virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev,
"Zhu Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@amd.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"David Stevens" <stevensd@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 18:04:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zfrskcmq.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240607074246.7647-1-lingshan.zhu@amd.com>
On Fri, Jun 07 2024, Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@amd.com> wrote:
> This commit allows the driver to suspend the device by
> introducing a new status bit SUSPEND in device_status.
>
> This commit also introduce a new feature bit VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND
> which indicating whether the device support SUSPEND.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> ---
> content.tex | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Can you please add a changelog? Especially as some of the previous
discussion has been lost due to the broken old mailing lists...
(...)
> +\drivernormative{\subsection}{Device Suspend}{General Initialization And Device Operation / Device Suspend}
> +
> +The driver MUST NOT set SUSPEND if FEATURES_OK is not set or VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND is not negotiated.
> +
> +Once the driver sets SUSPEND to \field{device status} of the device:
> +\begin{itemize}
> +\item The driver MUST re-read \field{device status} to verify whether the SUSPEND bit is set.
> +If not, the device does not support the SUSPEND feature.
That sentence is a bit weird: I'd expect the device to not offer
VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND in the first place in that case... could this rather
happen if the device is not able to handle the request at a specific
point in time?
> +\item The driver MUST NOT make any more buffers available to the device.
> +\item The driver MUST NOT access any fields of any virtqueues or notify any virtqueues.
"send notifications for any virtqueues"?
> +\item The driver MUST NOT access Device Configuration Space.
...except for the status field, if it is part of the config space?
> +\end{itemize}
> +
> +\devicenormative{\subsection}{Device Suspend}{General Initialization And Device Operation / Device Suspend}
> +
> +The device MUST ignore SUSPEND if FEATURES_OK is not set or VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND is not negotiated.
> +
> +The device MUST ignore all access to its Configuration Space while
> +suspended, except for \field{device status}.
...if it is part of the configuration space.
> +
> +A device MUST NOT send any notifications, access any virtqueues, or modify
> +any fields in its configuration space while suspended.
> +
> +If SUSPEND is set in \field{device status}, when the driver clears SUSPEND,
"subsequently clears SUSPEND"?
> +the device MUST either resume normal operation or set DEVICE_NEEDS_RESET.
> +
> +When the driver sets SUSPEND,
> +the device SHOULD perform the following actions before presenting SUSPEND bit in the \field{device status}:
> +
> +\begin{itemize}
> +\item Stop processing more buffers of any virtqueues
> +\item Wait until all buffers that are being processed have been used.
> +\item Send used buffer notifications to the driver.
> +\end{itemize}
So, is there any opportunity for the device to fail setting SUSPEND? I
mean, if the driver is supposed to look whether it sticks, there should
be conditions for when the device might clear it again...
> +
> \chapter{Virtio Transport Options}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options}
>
> Virtio can use various different buses, thus the standard is split
> @@ -872,6 +917,10 @@ \chapter{Reserved Feature Bits}\label{sec:Reserved Feature Bits}
> \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Feature Bits} for
> handling features reserved for future use.
>
> + \item[VIRTIO_F_SUSPEND(42)] This feature indicates that the driver can
> + set SUSPEND to the device.
"that the driver can trigger suspending the device via the SUSPEND flag"?
> + See \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Device Status Field}.
> +
> \end{description}
>
> \drivernormative{\section}{Reserved Feature Bits}{Reserved Feature Bits}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-10 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-07 7:42 [PATCH v5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status Zhu Lingshan
2024-06-10 16:04 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2024-06-11 5:17 ` Parav Pandit
2024-06-11 8:26 ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-06-11 8:48 ` Parav Pandit
2024-06-11 9:33 ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-06-11 9:43 ` Parav Pandit
2024-06-11 10:12 ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-06-11 10:37 ` Parav Pandit
2024-06-12 9:19 ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-06-12 10:07 ` Parav Pandit
2024-06-12 10:30 ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-06-12 11:26 ` Parav Pandit
2024-06-12 12:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-06-13 5:58 ` David Stevens
2024-06-13 9:59 ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-06-15 4:33 ` Parav Pandit
2024-06-17 2:22 ` Jason Wang
2024-06-17 3:00 ` Parav Pandit
2024-06-13 9:47 ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-06-12 12:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-06-11 8:20 ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-06-11 16:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-06-12 9:53 ` Zhu Lingshan
2024-06-12 12:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-06-12 7:43 ` David Stevens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zfrskcmq.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=lingshan.zhu@amd.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=stevensd@chromium.org \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox