From: Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen <mvaralar@redhat.com>
To: Peter Hilber <quic_philber@quicinc.com>
Cc: virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"Ridoux, Julien" <ridouxj@amazon.com>,
Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@quicinc.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] virtio-rtc: Add initial device specification
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:52:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6oEocvjwSsPmVxz@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250123101616.664-2-quic_philber@quicinc.com>
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 11:16:12AM +0100, Peter Hilber wrote:
> The virtio-rtc device provides information about current time through
> one or more clocks. As such, it is a Real-Time Clock (RTC) device.
>
> The normative statements for this device follow in the next patch.
>
> For this device, there is an RFC Linux kernel driver which is being
> upstreamed, and a proprietary device implementation.
>
> Miscellaneous
> -------------
>
> The spec does not specify how a driver should interpret clock readings,
> esp. also not how to perform clock synchronization.
>
> The device uses the "Timer/Clock" device id which is already part of the
> specification. This device id was registered a long time ago and should
> be unused according to the author's information. The name "RTC" was
> determined to be the best for a device which focuses on current time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hilber <quic_philber@quicinc.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v7:
>
> - Remove leap second and performance indications from struct
> virtio_rtc_resp_read_cross. Remove backing definitions.
>
> - Add wording change which was previously mistakenly placed in last
> patch.
>
> v6:
>
> - Make leap second status information optional if the clock smears (or
> might smear) leap seconds.
>
> - Do not use union for leap second indication.
>
> - Improve wording.
>
> - Refer to the new POSIX.1-2024 for UTC epoch definition.
>
> v5:
>
> - Change structure and wording to support adding shared memory like
> vmclock [8].
>
> - Add dedicated clock types for UTC leap second smearing (David
> Woodhouse).
>
> - Extend leap second indications.
>
> - Split UTC-TAI offset and fractional offset due to smearing (David
> Woodhouse).
>
> - Remove requirement that TAI offset must not be a whole second while
> clock is being smeared.
>
> - Align bit widths, and some names, with '[RFC PATCH v4] ptp: Add
> vDSO-style vmclock support' [8].
>
> - Replace VIRTIO_RTC_SUBTYPE_ by VIRTIO_RTC_SMEAR_.
>
> - For Arm Generic Timer, only support Virtual Count Register (David
> Woodhouse).
>
> - Rename MONO clock to MONOTONIC clock.
>
> v4:
>
> - Drop distinction of Arm Generic Timer virtual and physical counter [7].
>
> - Add requirement that device should assume that driver reads clock from
> first vCPU (David Woodhouse) [6].
>
> - Formatting and wording improvements.
>
> v3:
>
> - Address comments from Parav Pandit.
>
> - Split off normative requirements into a second commit [2].
>
> - Merge readq and controlq into requestq [3].
>
> - Don't guard cross-timestamping with feature bit [3].
>
> - Pad request headers to 64 bit [2].
>
> - Rename Virtio status codes to match UNIX error names [2].
>
> - Avoid Virtio status code clashes with net controlq ack values.
>
> - Reword to refer more to "requests", rather than "messages" [2].
>
> - Rephrase some sentences [2].
>
> - Use integer data types without "__" prefixes [2].
>
> - Reduce clock id width to 16 bits [5].
>
> - Make VIRTIO_RTC_FLAG_CROSS_CAP a bit mask rather than a bit index.
>
> v2:
>
> - Address comments from Cornelia Huck.
>
> - Add VIRTIO_RTC_M_CROSS_CAP message [1].
>
> - Fix various minor issues and improve wording [1].
>
> - Add several clarifications regarding device error statuses.
>
> [1] https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202304/msg00523.html
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/virtio-comment/b59a7dda-06fe-cff9-df61-b90aa4e50836@opensynergy.com/t/#mffb93800fea11d6dda9e151078abedd6ff1c0f1e
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/virtio-comment/b59a7dda-06fe-cff9-df61-b90aa4e50836@opensynergy.com/t/#m94efd0aa9b9c2b96a246b79ef8bfc3bf64ebe791
> [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230630171052.985577-1-peter.hilber@opensynergy.com/T/#m65fa1d715933360498c4e33d7225e4220215a9d6
> [5] https://lore.kernel.org/virtio-comment/b59a7dda-06fe-cff9-df61-b90aa4e50836@opensynergy.com/t/#mf00ce330228c28556d735eb9597469048c5d8b62
> [6] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/d796d9a5-8eda-4528-a6d8-1c4eba24aa1e@opensynergy.com/
> [7] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231218064253.9734-2-peter.hilber@opensynergy.com/
> [8] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240708092924.1473461-1-dwmw2@infradead.org/
>
> content.tex | 3 +-
> device-types/rtc/description.tex | 426 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> introduction.tex | 6 +
> 3 files changed, 434 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 device-types/rtc/description.tex
>
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index 67b1bf3c35ab..b1d93a8aebb4 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ \chapter{Device Types}\label{sec:Device Types}
> \hline
> 16 & GPU device \\
> \hline
> -17 & Timer/Clock device \\
> +17 & RTC (Timer/Clock) device \\
> \hline
> 18 & Input device \\
> \hline
> @@ -776,6 +776,7 @@ \chapter{Device Types}\label{sec:Device Types}
> \input{device-types/pmem/description.tex}
> \input{device-types/can/description.tex}
> \input{device-types/spi/description.tex}
> +\input{device-types/rtc/description.tex}
>
> \chapter{Reserved Feature Bits}\label{sec:Reserved Feature Bits}
>
> diff --git a/device-types/rtc/description.tex b/device-types/rtc/description.tex
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..aae015690b26
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/device-types/rtc/description.tex
> @@ -0,0 +1,426 @@
> +\section{RTC Device}\label{sec:Device Types / RTC Device}
> +
> +The RTC (Real Time Clock) device provides information about current
> +time. The device can provide different clocks, e.g.\ for the UTC or TAI
> +time standards, or for physical time elapsed since some past epoch. The
> +driver can read the clocks with simple or more accurate methods.
> +
> +\subsection{Device ID}\label{sec:Device Types / RTC Device / Device ID}
> +
> +17
> +
> +\subsection{Virtqueues}\label{sec:Device Types / RTC Device / Virtqueues}
> +
> +\begin{description}
> +\item[0] requestq
> +\end{description}
> +
> +The driver enqueues requests to the requestq.
> +
> +\subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / RTC Device / Feature bits}
> +
> +No device-specific feature bits are defined yet.
> +
> +\subsection{Device configuration layout}\label{sec:Device Types / RTC Device / Device configuration layout}
> +
> +There is no configuration data for the device.
> +
> +\subsection{Device Initialization}\label{sec:Device Types / RTC Device / Device Initialization}
> +
> +The device determines the set of clocks. The device can provide zero or
> +more clocks.
> +
> +\subsection{Device Operation}\label{sec:Device Types / RTC Device / Device Operation}
> +
> +For the requestq, the driver sends a message with a request, and
> +receives the response in the device-writable part of the message. The
> +requestq uses common request and response headers.
> +
> +\begin{lstlisting}
> +/* common request header */
> +struct virtio_rtc_req_head {
> + le16 msg_type;
> + u8 reserved[6];
> +};
> +
> +/* common response header */
> +struct virtio_rtc_resp_head {
> + u8 status;
> + u8 reserved[7];
> +};
> +\end{lstlisting}
> +
> +The \field{msg_type} field identifies the message type.
> +
> +The \field{status} field indicates whether the device successfully
> +executed the request. The device sets the \field{status} field to one of
> +the following values:
> +
> +\begin{lstlisting}
> +#define VIRTIO_RTC_S_OK 0
> +#define VIRTIO_RTC_S_EOPNOTSUPP 2
> +#define VIRTIO_RTC_S_ENODEV 3
> +#define VIRTIO_RTC_S_EINVAL 4
> +#define VIRTIO_RTC_S_EIO 5
> +\end{lstlisting}
> +
> +VIRTIO_RTC_S_OK indicates that the device successfully executed the
> +request.
> +
> +If \field{status} is not VIRTIO_RTC_S_OK, the value of other response
> +fields is undefined.
> +
> +VIRTIO_RTC_S_EOPNOTSUPP indicates that the device could not execute the
> +specific request due to an implementation limitation. The device also
> +returns status VIRTIO_RTC_S_EOPNOTSUPP for requests with unknown values
> +in the fields \field{msg_type} or \field{hw_counter}.
> +
> +VIRTIO_RTC_S_ENODEV indicates that the \field{clock_id} field value
> +supplied with the request does not identify a clock.
> +
> +VIRTIO_RTC_S_EINVAL indicates that
> +
> +\begin{itemize}
> +\item the driver request values are not allowed by the specification or
> +\item the device read-only part of the message, or device write-only
> + part of the message, is too small.
> +\end{itemize}
> +
> +VIRTIO_RTC_S_EIO indicates that the device did not execute the request
> +due to an error which was not caused by invalid input from the driver.
> +
> +All \field{reserved} fields are written as zero, and their value is
> +ignored.
> +
> +The set of clocks does not change after feature negotiation completion,
> +until device reset. The set of clocks should not change on device reset
> +either (similar to negotiated features). Clock identifiers are
> +zero-based, dense indices. All fields named \field{clock_id} contain
> +clock identifiers.
> +
> +\subsubsection{Common Definitions}\label{sec:Device Types / RTC Device / Device Operation / Common Definitions}
> +
> +This section makes common definitions.
> +
> +\paragraph{Clock Types}\label{sec:Device Types / RTC Device / Device Operation / Common Definitions / Clock Types}
> +
> +The following clock types are defined:
> +
> +\begin{lstlisting}
> +#define VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_UTC 0
> +#define VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_TAI 1
> +#define VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_MONOTONIC 2
> +#define VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_UTC_SMEARED 3
> +#define VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_UTC_MAYBE_SMEARED 4
> +\end{lstlisting}
> +
> +\begin{description}
> +
> +\item[VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_UTC] uses the UTC (Coordinated Universal Time)
> + time standard. This clock uses the time epoch of January 1,
> + 1970, 00:00 UTC. This is the same epoch as \emph{Unix time}. The
> + clock's seconds since the epoch are related to UTC time as
> + defined by \hyperref[intro:EPOCH]{EPOCH}.
> +
> + This clock observes positive and negative leap seconds as
> + announced by standard bodies. At the start of leap seconds, the
> + clock steps accordingly.
> +
> +\item[VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_TAI] uses the TAI (International Atomic Time)
> + time standard. This clock uses the time epoch of January 1,
> + 1970, 00:00 TAI.
> +
> +\item[VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_MONOTONIC] uses monotonic physical time (SI
> + seconds subdivisions) since some unspecified epoch. The epoch is
> + before or during device reset.
> +
> +\item[VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_UTC_SMEARED] deviates from the UTC standard by
> + smearing time in the vicinity of a leap second. This avoids
> + clock steps due to UTC leap seconds. Otherwise, this clock is
> + similar to VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_UTC.
> +
> +\item[VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_UTC_MAYBE_SMEARED] This clock
> +
> +\begin{itemize}
> +\item may deviate from the UTC standard by smearing time in the vicinity
> + of a leap second (similar to VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_UTC_SMEARED), or
> +
> +\item may step at the start of leap seconds like VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_UTC.
> +\end{itemize}
> +
> +A clock of type VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_UTC_MAYBE_SMEARED can change this
> +behavior for every leap second.
> +
> +\end{description}
> +
> +In the following, \emph{UTC-like clock} designates any clock of type
> +VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_UTC, VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_UTC_SMEARED, or
> +VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_UTC_MAYBE_SMEARED.
> +
> +Additional clock types may be standardized in the future.
> +Implementation-specific definitions of clock types are not recommended
> +and use ids between 0xF0 and 0xFF.
Do you mean that ids between 0xF0 and 0xFF are not recommended?
> +
> +\paragraph{Smearing Variants}\label{sec:Device Types / RTC Device / Device Operation / Common Definitions / Smearing Variants}
> +
> +Leap second \emph{smearing variants} describe the deviation from the UTC
> +standard in the vicinity of a leap second. The following smearing
> +variants are currently defined:
> +
> +\begin{lstlisting}
> +#define VIRTIO_RTC_SMEAR_UNSPECIFIED 0
> +#define VIRTIO_RTC_SMEAR_NOON_LINEAR 1
> +#define VIRTIO_RTC_SMEAR_UTC_SLS 2
> +\end{lstlisting}
> +
> +\begin{description}
> +
> + \item[VIRTIO_RTC_SMEAR_UNSPECIFIED] means that it is unspecified
> + how time is smeared in the vicinity of leap seconds.
> +
> + \item[VIRTIO_RTC_SMEAR_NOON_LINEAR] specifies a linear smear
> + from noon prior to the leap second until noon after the
> + leap second.
> +
> + \item[VIRTIO_RTC_SMEAR_UTC_SLS] specifies a linear smear as per
> + the \hyperref[intro:UTC-SLS]{UTC-SLS} proposal.
> +
> +\end{description}
> +
> +Clocks of type VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_UTC_SMEARED always behave according to a
> +smearing variant. The smearing variant does not change over the clock's
> +lifetime.
> +
> +For clocks of type VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_UTC_MAYBE_SMEARED, it is unspecified
> +whether leap seconds are smeared, and how leap seconds are smeared.
> +
> +Additional smearing variants may be standardized in the future.
> +Implementation-specific definitions of smearing variants are not
> +recommended and use ids greater than or equal to 0xF0.
Like the question above, It is not clear to me if `ids greater than or
equal to 0xF0` are not recommended.
> +
> +In the following, \emph{leap smearing clock} designates
> +
> +\begin{itemize}
> +
> +\item any clock of type VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_UTC_SMEARED
> +
> +\item any clock of type VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_UTC_MAYBE_SMEARED at any time
> + when the clock is smearing a leap second.
> +
> +\end{itemize}
> +
> +\paragraph{Hardware Counters}\label{sec:Device Types / RTC Device / Device Operation / Common Definitions / Hardware Counters}
> +
> +The following hardware counter identifiers are specified:
> +
> +\begin{lstlisting}
> +/* Arm Generic Timer Counter-timer Virtual Count Register (CNTVCT_EL0) */
> +#define VIRTIO_RTC_COUNTER_ARM_VCT 0
> +/* x86 Time-Stamp Counter */
> +#define VIRTIO_RTC_COUNTER_X86_TSC 1
> +/* Invalid */
> +#define VIRTIO_RTC_COUNTER_INVALID 0xFF
> +\end{lstlisting}
> +
> +Additional hardware counter identifiers may be standardized in the
> +future. Implementation-specific hardware counter identifiers are not
> +recommended and have values between 0xF0 and 0xFE.
> +
> +\subsubsection{Control Requests}\label{sec:Device Types / RTC Device / Device Operation / Control Requests}
> +
> +Through \emph{control requests}, the driver requests information about
> +the device capabilities. The driver enqueues control requests in the
> +requestq.
> +
> +\begin{description}
> +
> +\item[VIRTIO_RTC_REQ_CFG] discovers the number of clocks.
> +
> +\begin{lstlisting}
> +#define VIRTIO_RTC_REQ_CFG 0x1000 /* message type */
> +
> +struct virtio_rtc_req_cfg {
> + struct virtio_rtc_req_head head;
> + /* no request params */
> +};
> +
> +struct virtio_rtc_resp_cfg {
> + struct virtio_rtc_resp_head head;
> + le16 num_clocks;
> + u8 reserved[6];
> +};
> +\end{lstlisting}
> +
> +Field \field{num_clocks} contains the number of clocks. A device
> +provides zero or more clocks. Valid clock ids are those smaller than
> +\field{num_clocks}.
> +
> +\item[VIRTIO_RTC_REQ_CLOCK_CAP] discovers the capabilities of the clock
> +identified by the \field{clock_id} field.
> +
> +\begin{lstlisting}
> +#define VIRTIO_RTC_REQ_CLOCK_CAP 0x1001 /* message type */
> +
> +struct virtio_rtc_req_clock_cap {
> + struct virtio_rtc_req_head head;
> + le16 clock_id;
> + u8 reserved[6];
> +};
> +
> +struct virtio_rtc_resp_clock_cap {
> + struct virtio_rtc_resp_head head;
> + u8 type;
> + u8 leap_second_smearing;
> + u8 reserved[6];
> +};
> +\end{lstlisting}
> +
> +The \field{type} field identifies the clock type. A device provides
> +zero or more clocks for a clock type.
> +
> +Clocks of type VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_UTC_SMEARED indicate the \emph{smearing
> +variant} through field \field{leap_second_smearing}. All other clocks
> +set \field{leap_second_smearing} to VIRTIO_RTC_SMEAR_UNSPECIFIED.
> +
> +\item[VIRTIO_RTC_REQ_CROSS_CAP] discovers whether the device supports
> +cross-timestamping for a particular pair of clock and hardware counter.
> +
> +\begin{lstlisting}
> +#define VIRTIO_RTC_REQ_CROSS_CAP 0x1002 /* message type */
> +
> +struct virtio_rtc_req_cross_cap {
> + struct virtio_rtc_req_head head;
> + le16 clock_id;
> + u8 hw_counter;
> + u8 reserved[5];
> +};
> +
> +
> +struct virtio_rtc_resp_cross_cap {
> + struct virtio_rtc_resp_head head;
> +#define VIRTIO_RTC_FLAG_CROSS_CAP (1 << 0)
> + u8 flags;
> + u8 reserved[7];
> +};
> +\end{lstlisting}
> +
> +The \field{clock_id} field identifies the clock, and the
> +\field{hw_counter} field identifies the hardware counter, for which
> +cross-timestamp support is probed. The device sets flag
> +VIRTIO_RTC_FLAG_CROSS_CAP in the \field{flags} field if the clock
> +supports cross-timestamping for the particular clock and hardware
> +counter, and clears the flag otherwise.
> +
> +\end{description}
> +
> +\subsubsection{Read Requests}\label{sec:Device Types / RTC Device / Device Operation / Read Requests}
> +
> +Through \emph{read requests}, the driver requests clock readings from
> +the device. The driver enqueues read requests in the requestq. The
> +device obtains device-side clock readings and forwards these clock
> +readings to the driver. The driver may enhance and interpret the clock
> +readings through methods which are beyond the scope of this
> +specification.
> +
> +Once DRIVER_OK has been set, the device should support reading every
> +clock, even when a clock may yet have to be aligned to reference time
> +sources.
> +
> +In general,
> +
> +\begin{itemize}
> +\item clocks may jump backwards or forward, and
> +\item the clock frequency may change. Clocks may be \emph{slewed},
> + i.e.\ clocks may run at a frequency other than their current
> + best frequency estimate.
> +\end{itemize}
> +
> +As long as a clock does not jump backwards, the driver clock readings
> +through read request responses increase monotonically:
> +
> +\begin{itemize}
> +\item As long as a clock does not jump backwards in-between device-side
> + clock readings, the driver-side readings for that clock increase
> + monotonically as well, in the order in which the driver
> + marks read requests as available.
> +
> +\item The device marks read requests for the same clock as used in
> + the order in which the messages were marked as available.
> +\end{itemize}
> +
Should it not be `MUST` here?
> +For a clock of type VIRTIO_RTC_CLOCK_MONOTONIC, the device always returns
> +monotonically increasing clock readings through read request responses.
> +
> +The unit of all \field{clock_reading} fields is 1
> +nanosecond.\footnote{For time epochs in year 1970 or later, this means
> +that time until at least year 2553 can be represented in the \field{le64
> +clock_reading} fields.}
> +
> +\begin{description}
> +
> +\item[VIRTIO_RTC_REQ_READ] reads the clock identified by the
> +\field{clock_id} field. The device supports this message for every
> +clock.
> +
> +\begin{lstlisting}
> +#define VIRTIO_RTC_REQ_READ 0x0001 /* message type */
> +
> +struct virtio_rtc_req_read {
> + struct virtio_rtc_req_head head;
> + le16 clock_id;
> + u8 reserved[6];
> +};
> +
> +struct virtio_rtc_resp_read {
> + struct virtio_rtc_resp_head head;
> + le64 clock_reading;
> +};
> +\end{lstlisting}
> +
> +\field{clock_reading} is a device-side clock reading obtained after the
> +message was marked as available.
> +
> +\item[VIRTIO_RTC_REQ_READ_CROSS] returns a cross-timestamp for the clock
> +identified by the \field{clock_id} field.\footnote{Cross-timestamping
> +is similar to the ptp_kvm mechanism in the Linux kernel.} This message
> +may yield better performance than using VIRTIO_RTC_REQ_READ.
> +
> +The driver can determine whether the device supports
> +VIRTIO_RTC_REQ_READ_CROSS for a specific clock and \field{hw_counter}
> +through VIRTIO_RTC_REQ_CROSS_CAP.
> +
> +\begin{lstlisting}
> +#define VIRTIO_RTC_REQ_READ_CROSS 0x0002 /* message type */
> +
> +struct virtio_rtc_req_read_cross {
> + struct virtio_rtc_req_head head;
> + le16 clock_id;
> + u8 hw_counter;
> + u8 reserved[5];
> +};
> +
> +struct virtio_rtc_resp_read_cross {
> + struct virtio_rtc_resp_head head;
> + le64 clock_reading;
> + le64 counter_cycles;
> +};
> +\end{lstlisting}
> +
> +The \field{hw_counter} field specifies the hardware counter for which
> +the driver requests a cross-timestamp.
> +
> +Cross-timestamping returns a \field{clock_reading}, and an associated
> +hardware counter value, \field{counter_cycles}. The
> +\field{counter_cycles} field is the approximate or precise value which
> +the driver would have read at the \field{clock_reading} time instant
> +from the hardware counter identified by \field{hw_counter}. How the
> +device determines the value which the driver would have seen is beyond
> +the scope of this specification. In case hardware counter reads differ
> +among CPUs used by the driver, the device should assume that the driver
> +reads the hardware counter from the CPU which the driver enumerates as
> +the first.
> +
> +The hardware counter identifiers are defined in
> +\ref{sec:Device Types / RTC Device / Device Operation / Common Definitions / Hardware Counters}.
> +
> +\end{description}
> diff --git a/introduction.tex b/introduction.tex
> index e60298a4d78b..34f9485bc393 100644
> --- a/introduction.tex
> +++ b/introduction.tex
> @@ -168,6 +168,12 @@ \section{Normative References}\label{sec:Normative References}
> Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP
> 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017
> \newline\url{http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc8174.txt}\\
> + \phantomsection\label{intro:EPOCH}\textbf{[EPOCH]} &
> + POSIX.1-2024, Base Definitions, Seconds Since the Epoch
> + \newline\url{https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/basedefs/V1_chap04.html#tag_04_19}\\
> + \phantomsection\label{intro:UTC-SLS}\textbf{[UTC-SLS]} &
> + UTC with Smoothed Leap Seconds (UTC-SLS)
> + \newline\url{https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/time/utc-sls/}\\
> \end{longtable}
>
> \section{Non-Normative References}
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-10 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-23 10:16 [PATCH v7 0/4] virtio-rtc: Add device specification Peter Hilber
2025-01-23 10:16 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] virtio-rtc: Add initial " Peter Hilber
2025-02-10 13:52 ` Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen [this message]
2025-02-13 18:12 ` Peter Hilber
2025-02-19 12:45 ` Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen
2025-01-23 10:16 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] virtio-rtc: Add initial normative statements Peter Hilber
2025-02-10 16:33 ` Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen
2025-02-13 18:13 ` Peter Hilber
2025-02-19 14:58 ` Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen
2025-02-20 16:36 ` Peter Hilber
2025-02-24 11:09 ` Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen
2025-01-23 10:16 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] virtio-rtc: Add alarm feature Peter Hilber
2025-02-11 11:51 ` Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen
2025-02-13 18:13 ` Peter Hilber
2025-02-19 16:08 ` Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen
2025-02-20 16:51 ` Peter Hilber
2025-02-24 11:58 ` Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen
2025-01-23 10:16 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] virtio-rtc: Add normative statements for " Peter Hilber
2025-02-11 12:33 ` Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen
2025-02-13 18:14 ` Peter Hilber
2025-02-19 15:36 ` Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen
2025-02-20 17:06 ` Peter Hilber
2025-02-24 12:13 ` Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen
2025-02-25 11:18 ` Peter Hilber
2025-02-25 15:04 ` Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen
2025-02-25 15:47 ` Peter Hilber
2025-03-04 16:25 ` Peter Hilber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z6oEocvjwSsPmVxz@fedora \
--to=mvaralar@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=quic_philber@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_tsoni@quicinc.com \
--cc=ridouxj@amazon.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox