public inbox for virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen <mvaralar@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Juraj Marcin <jmarcin@redhat.com>,
	virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-mem: introduce VIRTIO_MEM_F_PERSISTENT_SUSPEND
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:22:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZwPutFATuftmzHK6@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11d91474-5b53-49f8-9301-a2db885948a0@redhat.com>

On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 10:17:23AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 09.08.24 16:03, Juraj Marcin wrote:
> > Before, the behavior while suspending to a deep sleep state and waking
> > up was not specified. For example, in x86 QEMU VM all devices receive a
> > reset request during wake-up. This would lead to unplugging of all the
> > plugged memory blocks. Due to this, suspending is disallowed in the
> > Linux Kernel, when plugged memory is present and
> > VIRTIO_MEM_F_PERSISTENT_SUSPEND feature flag is not advertised by the
> > virtio-mem device.
> > 
> > This new flag should signal to the guest driver, that the device can
> > correctly suspend to a deep sleep state and then wake up without
> > disrupting the plugged memory blocks. This feature flag is already
> > supported in the Linux Kernel [1] and should be soon also supported in
> > QEMU [2].
> > 
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240318120645.105664-1-david@redhat.com/
> > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240806160756.182524-1-jmarcin@redhat.com/
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Juraj Marcin <jmarcin@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >   device-types/mem/description.tex | 12 ++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/device-types/mem/description.tex b/device-types/mem/description.tex
> > index 0a6d558..5bff24c 100644
> > --- a/device-types/mem/description.tex
> > +++ b/device-types/mem/description.tex
> > @@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ \subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / Memory Device / Feature bits}
> >   access unplugged memory. \footnote{On platforms with memory properties that
> >   might get modified implicitly on memory access, this feature is expected to
> >   be offered by the device.}
> > +\item[VIRTIO_MEM_F_PERSISTENT_SUSPEND (2)] The driver can allow the guest
> > +system to enter suspended state (deep sleep, suspend-to-RAM).
> >   \end{description}
> >   \subsection{Device configuration layout}\label{sec:Device Types / Memory Device / Device configuration layout}
> > @@ -174,6 +176,9 @@ \subsection{Device Initialization}\label{Device Types / Memory Device / Device I
> >   The device MUST NOT modify memory or memory properties of plugged memory
> >   blocks during device reset.
> > +The device SHOULD offer VIRTIO_MEM_F_PERSISTENT_SUSPEND if the platform
> > +supports suspending (deep sleep, suspend-to-RAM) with plugged memory blocks.
> > +
> >   \subsection{Device Operation}\label{sec:Device Types / Memory Device / Device Operation}
> >   The device notifies the driver about the amount of memory the device wants
> > @@ -268,6 +273,9 @@ \subsection{Device Operation}\label{sec:Device Types / Memory Device / Device Op
> >   memory blocks to unplug them, or it would not be able to make use of
> >   unplugged memory blocks after plugging them (e.g., alignment).
> > +If VIRTIO_MEM_F_PERSISTENT_SUSPEND has not been negotiated, the driver MUST NOT
> > +allow the guest system to enter a suspended state (deep sleep, suspend-to-RAM).

I think `guest system` could be simply `guest` but I do not have a
strong opinion about it.

> > +
> >   \devicenormative{\subsubsection}{Device Operation}{Device Types / Memory Device / Device Operation}
> >   The device MUST provide the exact same memory properties with the exact same
> > @@ -293,6 +301,10 @@ \subsection{Device Operation}\label{sec:Device Types / Memory Device / Device Op
> >   The device SHOULD unplug all memory blocks during system resets.
> > +If VIRTIO_MEM_F_PERSISTENT_SUSPEND has been negotiated, the device MUST NOT not
> > +change the state of memory blocks when suspending or when waking up from
> > +suspended state (deep sleep, suspend-to-RAM).
> > +
> >   \subsubsection{PLUG request}\label{sec:Device Types / Memory Device / Device Operation / PLUG request}
> >   Request to plug consecutive memory blocks that are currently unplugged.
> 
> The kernel and QEMU part is upstream. A second pair of eyes would be great
> :)
> 

Reviewed-by: Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen <mvaralar@redhat.com>

Matias


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-07 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-09 14:03 [PATCH] virtio-mem: introduce VIRTIO_MEM_F_PERSISTENT_SUSPEND Juraj Marcin
2024-08-21 18:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-07  8:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-07 14:22   ` Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen [this message]
2024-10-08 13:14     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-09  7:45       ` Juraj Marcin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZwPutFATuftmzHK6@fedora \
    --to=mvaralar@redhat.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmarcin@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox