From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
Cc: cohuck@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, dan.daly@intel.com,
alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, mark.d.rustad@intel.com,
cunming.liang@intel.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v4] content: support SR-IOV
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 16:01:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180604155945-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180524164951.3102-1-tiwei.bie@intel.com>
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:49:51AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> Allocate a feature bit for virtio devices which support SR-IOV.
>
> Suggested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
> Fixes: https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/11
I have a question on this: how exactly is reset handled?
Does reset disable IOV?
> ---
> More details can be found from this thread:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10285541/
>
> v3 -> v4:
> - Limit the feature to PCI devices with SR-IOV cap (MST);
>
> v2 -> v3:
> - Improve the wording (Cornelia);
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - s/Reserve/Allocate/ (MST);
> - Add a Fixes tag (MST);
> - Be more explicit in driver requirement (MST);
> - Remove the "device MAY fail" description (MST);
> - Rebase on IO_BARRIER patch;
>
> RFC -> v1:
> - Mention PCI in the description (Cornelia);
>
> content.tex | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index c4b3b5c..beec6c1 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -95,10 +95,10 @@ Feature bits are allocated as follows:
> \begin{description}
> \item[0 to 23] Feature bits for the specific device type
>
> -\item[24 to 36] Feature bits reserved for extensions to the queue and
> +\item[24 to 37] Feature bits reserved for extensions to the queue and
> feature negotiation mechanisms
>
> -\item[37 and above] Feature bits reserved for future extensions.
> +\item[38 and above] Feature bits reserved for future extensions.
> \end{description}
>
> \begin{note}
> @@ -5365,6 +5365,9 @@ Descriptors} and \ref{sec:Packed Virtqueues / Indirect Flag: Scatter-Gather Supp
> better performance. This feature indicates whether
> a stronger form of barrier suitable for hardware
> devices is necessary.
> + \item[VIRTIO_F_SR_IOV(37)] This feature indicates that
> + the device supports Single Root I/O Virtualization.
> + Currently only PCI devices support this feature.
> \end{description}
>
> \drivernormative{\section}{Reserved Feature Bits}{Reserved Feature Bits}
> @@ -5384,6 +5387,16 @@ A driver SHOULD accept VIRTIO_F_IO_BARRIER if it is offered.
> If VIRTIO_F_IO_BARRIER has been negotiated, a driver MUST use
> the barriers suitable for hardware devices.
>
> +If VIRTIO_F_SR_IOV has been negotiated, a driver can enable
> +virtual functions through the device's PCI SR-IOV capability
> +structure. A driver MUST NOT negotiate VIRTIO_F_SR_IOV if
> +the device does not have a PCI SR-IOV capability structure
> +or is not a PCI device. A driver MUST negotiate
> +VIRTIO_F_SR_IOV and complete the feature negotiation
> +(including setting the DRIVER_OK \field{status} bit) before
> +enabling virtual functions through the device's PCI SR-IOV
> +capability structure.
> +
> \devicenormative{\section}{Reserved Feature Bits}{Reserved Feature Bits}
>
> A device MUST offer VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1. A device MAY fail to operate further
> @@ -5400,6 +5413,10 @@ buffers in the same order in which they have been available.
> A device MAY fail to operate further if VIRTIO_F_IO_BARRIER
> is not accepted.
>
> +A device SHOULD offer VIRTIO_F_SR_IOV if it is a PCI device
> +and presents a PCI SR-IOV capability structure, otherwise
> +it MUST NOT offer VIRTIO_F_SR_IOV.
> +
> \section{Legacy Interface: Reserved Feature Bits}\label{sec:Reserved Feature Bits / Legacy Interface: Reserved Feature Bits}
>
> Transitional devices MAY offer the following:
> --
> 2.17.0
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-04 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-24 16:49 [virtio-dev] [PATCH v4] content: support SR-IOV Tiwei Bie
2018-05-29 13:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-29 13:41 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-05-29 13:44 ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2018-06-04 13:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2018-06-05 1:30 ` Tiwei Bie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180604155945-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=cunming.liang@intel.com \
--cc=dan.daly@intel.com \
--cc=mark.d.rustad@intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox