From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, dan.daly@intel.com,
cunming.liang@intel.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [RFC] content: use a consistent wording for device status
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 11:05:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180613110552.7a097717.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180612053221.22925-1-tiwei.bie@intel.com>
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 13:32:21 +0800
Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com> wrote:
> There is a part called "device status field" in a
> Virtio device. Currently, both of \field{status}
> and \field{device status} are used to refer to it,
> which is a bit confusing. This patch changes spec
> to use \field{device status} consistently.
>
> Suggested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
> ---
> If we want this change, I'll open an issue and
> send a formal patch.
Sounds good, given that there are some device-type specific 'status'
fields, which makes things confusing.
>
> content.tex | 21 ++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Patch looks good.
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-13 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-12 5:32 [virtio-dev] [RFC] content: use a consistent wording for device status Tiwei Bie
2018-06-13 9:05 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2018-06-13 9:13 ` [virtio-dev] " Tiwei Bie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180613110552.7a097717.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=cunming.liang@intel.com \
--cc=dan.daly@intel.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox