From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: virtio-dev-return-4659-cohuck=redhat.com@lists.oasis-open.org Sender: List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Received: from lists.oasis-open.org (oasis-open.org [10.110.1.242]) by lists.oasis-open.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C239985B04 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 02:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 05:05:37 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20180710045848-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20180629221907.3662-1-venu.busireddy@oracle.com> <20180702161404.GA2339@rkaganb.sw.ru> <449f1449-ddf6-cd95-976c-14d04d8d503a@oracle.com> <20180703095825.GC30904@rkaganb.sw.ru> <20180709130035.GA6271@rkaganb.sw.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180709130035.GA6271@rkaganb.sw.ru> Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] Use of unique identifier for pairing virtio and passthrough devices... To: Roman Kagan , si-wei liu , Venu Busireddy , Marcel Apfelbaum , virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-ID: On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 04:00:36PM +0300, Roman Kagan wrote: > There are a few things that need to be specific for PT and/or PV > transport, the matching identifier among them, but I guess a lot can > still be in common. Maybe but frankly unless someone actually plans to bother implementing all this in QEMU's limited emulation of hyper-v on top of kvm, I don't see why would we care. What I saw gives me the impression Hyper-V wants to just be left alone as much as possible and maybe we should respect that. -- MST --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org