From: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, cohuck@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2] packed-ring: fix example code
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 10:07:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181205020744.GA31478@btwcube1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181204115155-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 12:11:38PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 06:49:29PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > Driver can't just check whether USED bit equals to the used
> > wrap counter when checking whether a descriptor is a used
> > descriptor. Below is an example:
> >
> > Assuming ring size is 4, ring's initial state will be:
> >
> > +----+----+----+----+
> > | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
> > +----+----+----+----+
> >
> > 00 means AVAIL=0 USED=0, 01 means AVAIL=0 USED=1
> > 10 means AVAIL=1 USED=0, 11 means AVAIL=1 USED=1
> >
> > After driver made two descriptor chains available and each
> > chain consists of two descriptors, the ring could be:
> >
> > +----+-----------+----+-----------+
> > | 10 | 10 (id=0) | 10 | 10 (id=1) |
> > +----+-----------+----+-----------+
> >
> > After device processed all the available descriptors and made
> > them used (e.g. in order), the ring could be:
> >
> > +-----------+----+-----------+----+
> > | 11 (id=0) | 10 | 11 (id=1) | 10 |
> > +-----------+----+-----------+----+
> >
> > After driver processed all the used descriptors and made
> > one descriptor (not chained, just one descriptor) available,
> > the ring could be:
> >
> > +-----------+----+----+----+
> > | 01 (id=0) | 10 | 11 | 10 |
> > +-----------+----+----+----+
> >
> > After device made that descriptor used, the ring will be:
> >
> > +-----------+----+----+----+
> > | 00 (id=0) | 10 | 11 | 10 |
> > +-----------+----+----+----+
> >
> > If driver just checks whether USED bit equals to the used
> > wrap counter when checking whether a descriptor is a used
> > descriptor, after processing the first descriptor (whose
> > AVAIL and USED bits are both 0), and advancing vq->next_used
> > pointer, it will then also treat the next descriptor, i.e.
> > the second descriptor (whose AVAIL and USED bits are 1 and
> > 0 respectively) as a used descriptor which is wrong. The
> > most straightforward way to fix it is to also check whether
> > AVAIL bit equals to USED bit.
> >
> > Fixes: https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/29
> > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - Add "Fixes" tag;
> > - Refine commit log;
> >
> > packed-ring.tex | 6 ++++--
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/packed-ring.tex b/packed-ring.tex
> > index f24f49b..c913768 100644
> > --- a/packed-ring.tex
> > +++ b/packed-ring.tex
> > @@ -688,15 +688,17 @@ for (;;) {
> > struct pvirtq_desc *d = vq->desc[vq->next_used];
> >
> > flags = d->flags;
> > + bool avail = flags & VIRTQ_DESC_F_AVAIL;
> > bool used = flags & VIRTQ_DESC_F_USED;
> >
> > - if (used != vq->used_wrap_count) {
> > + if (avail != used || used != vq->used_wrap_count) {
>
> I think I prefer avail != vq->used_wrap_count.
> This is imho clearer because both bits are controlled by the driver.
>
> And maybe add a comment along the lines of
>
> /*
> * Check that
> * 1. Descriptor has been made available.
> * Note: there are many other way to check this, e.g.
> * track number of outstanding available descriptors or buffers
> * and check that it's not 0.
> * 2. Descriptor has been used by device.
> */
>
OK.
> > vq->driver_event.flags = RING_EVENT_FLAGS_ENABLE;
> > memory_barrier();
> >
> > flags = d->flags;
> > + bool avail = flags & VIRTQ_DESC_F_AVAIL;
> > bool used = flags & VIRTQ_DESC_F_USED;
> > - if (used != vq->used_wrap_count) {
> > + if (avail != used || used != vq->used_wrap_count) {
>
> So why do we need to re-test avail here? I guess it's in case
> driver is making descriptors available in parallel?
> If so maybe explain that:
>
> /*
> * Re-test in case another thread submitted more descriptors
> * and/or device used more descriptors before driver enabled events.
> */
>
OK.
Thanks
>
> > break;
> > }
>
>
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-05 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-04 10:49 [virtio-dev] [PATCH v2] packed-ring: fix example code Tiwei Bie
2018-12-04 17:11 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-05 2:07 ` Tiwei Bie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181205020744.GA31478@btwcube1 \
--to=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox