Discussion of the implementations of VIRTIO specification
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org,
	Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio: document virtio_config_ops restrictions
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 13:48:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190104134855.72418c51.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190103182849.7b0b0f0b@oc2783563651>

On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 18:28:49 +0100
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Thu,  3 Jan 2019 17:08:04 +0100
> Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Some transports (e.g. virtio-ccw) implement virtio operations that
> > seem to be a simple read/write as something more involved that
> > cannot be done from an atomic context.
> > 
> > Give at least a hint about that.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/virtio_config.h | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > index 7087ef946ba7..987b6491b946 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > @@ -12,6 +12,11 @@ struct irq_affinity;
> >  
> >  /**
> >   * virtio_config_ops - operations for configuring a virtio device
> > + * Note: Do not assume that a transport implements all of the operations
> > + *       getting/setting a value as a simple read/write! Generally speaking,
> > + *       any of @get/@set, @get_status/@set_status, or @get_features/
> > + *       @finalize_features are NOT safe to be called from an atomic
> > + *       context.  
> 
> I think the only exception is @bus_name (and maybe @generation, I don't
> know) because it does not have to 'speak' with the hypervisor. If a
> transport operation has to 'speak' with the hypervisor, we do it by
> making it interpret a channel program. That means not safe to be called
> form atomic context. Or am I missing something?

I explicitly singled out the listed callbacks because they read/write a
value and there might be more to them than meets the eye. I would
assume that nobody expects calling e.g. find_vqs (allocating queues)
from an atomic context to be a good idea :) Maybe I should do
s/Generally speaking/In particular/ ?

That said, it's only a hint; we should add might_sleep as well to
interfaces where it makes sense.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org


  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-04 12:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-03 16:08 [virtio-dev] [PATCH 0/2] virtio: virtio_config_ops documentation Cornelia Huck
2019-01-03 16:08 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix virtio_config_ops description Cornelia Huck
2019-01-14 14:09   ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2019-01-14 14:57     ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-15  2:15     ` Wei Wang
2019-01-15  2:20       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-01-03 16:08 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH 2/2] virtio: document virtio_config_ops restrictions Cornelia Huck
2019-01-03 16:28   ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-01-04 12:39     ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-03 17:28   ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-04 12:48     ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2019-01-15  2:18   ` [virtio-dev] " Wei Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190104134855.72418c51.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox