Discussion of the implementations of VIRTIO specification
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org,
	Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>,
	Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] virtio-blk: document data[] size constraints
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 23:14:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190130231152-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190131023617.23007-2-stefanha@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:36:14AM +0800, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> The struct virtio_blk_req->data[] field is a multiple of 512 bytes long
> for read and write requests.  Flush requests don't use data[] at all.
> 
> The new discard and write zeroes requests being introduced in VIRTIO 1.1
> put struct virtio_blk_discard_write_zeroes elements into data[], so it
> must be a multiple of the struct size.
> 
> The uint8_t data[][512] pseudo-code makes it look like discard and write
> zeroes requests must pad to 512 bytes.  This wastes memory since struct
> virtio_blk_discard_write_data is only 16 bytes long.
> 
> Furthermore, all known implementations wishing to take advantage of this
> upcoming VIRTIO 1.1 feature do not use 512-byte padding (Linux
> virtio_blk.ko, QEMU virtio-blk device emulation, the SPDK virtio-blk
> driver, and the SPDK vhost-user-blk device backend).
> 
> This patch documents the data[] size constraints clearly in the driver
> normative section.  This is clearer than the current pseudo-code.
> 
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
> Cc: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
>  content.tex | 14 +++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index 836ee52..b185bb0 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -3941,7 +3941,7 @@ struct virtio_blk_req {
>          le32 type;
>          le32 reserved;
>          le64 sector;
> -        u8 data[][512];
> +        u8 data[];
>          u8 status;
>  };
>  
> @@ -3971,6 +3971,11 @@ The \field{sector} number indicates the offset (multiplied by 512) where
>  the read or write is to occur. This field is unused and set to 0 for
>  commands other than read or write.
>  
> +VIRTIO_BLK_T_IN requests populate \field{data} with the contents of sectors
> +read from the block device (in multiples of 512 bytes).  VIRTIO_BLK_T_OUT
> +requests write the contents of \field{data} to the block device (in multiples
> +of 512 bytes).
> +
>  The \field{data} used for discard or write zeroes command is described
>  by one or more virtio_blk_discard_write_zeroes structs. \field{sector}
>  indicates the starting offset (in 512-byte units) of the segment, while
> @@ -3997,6 +4002,13 @@ A driver SHOULD accept the VIRTIO_BLK_F_RO feature if offered.
>  A driver MUST set \field{sector} to 0 for a VIRTIO_BLK_T_FLUSH request.
>  A driver SHOULD NOT include any data in a VIRTIO_BLK_T_FLUSH request.
>  
> +The length of \field{data} MUST be a multiple of 512 bytes for VIRTIO_BLK_T_IN
> +and VIRTIO_BLK_T_OUT requests.
> +
> +The length of \field{data} MUST be a multiple of the size of struct
> +virtio_blk_discard_write_zeroes for VIRTIO_BLK_T_DISCARD and
> +VIRTIO_BLK_T_WRITE_ZEROES requests.
> +

So a single request can discard/write multiple ranges?
It might be a good idea to make this explicit.
Also is this capability useful/used? And what's the value of status
in case some of the requests fail?


>  If the VIRTIO_BLK_F_CONFIG_WCE feature is negotiated, the driver MAY
>  switch to writethrough or writeback mode by writing respectively 0 and
>  1 to the \field{writeback} field.  After writing a 0 to \field{writeback},
> -- 
> 2.20.1

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org


  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-31  4:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-31  2:36 [virtio-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] virtio-blk: discard and write zeroes clarifications Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-01-31  2:36 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] virtio-blk: document data[] size constraints Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-01-31  4:14   ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2019-02-18  7:22     ` [virtio-dev] " Jan Kiszka
2019-02-18 14:04       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-02-20  3:49         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-22  5:53         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-22  9:55           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-01-31  2:36 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] virtio-blk: move virtio_blk_discard_write_zeroes definition Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-01-31  2:36 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] virtio-blk: describe write zeroes unmap semantics Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-01-31  2:36 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] virtio-blk: avoid inconsistent "DISCARD" term Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190130231152-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=changpeng.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox