From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: virtio-dev-return-6739-cohuck=redhat.com@lists.oasis-open.org Sender: List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Received: from lists.oasis-open.org (oasis-open.org [10.110.1.242]) by lists.oasis-open.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CFCA985DD1 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 08:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 03:18:57 -0500 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20200212024158-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <8a4ea95d6d77a2814aaf6897b5517353289a098e.1581305609.git.zhabin@linux.alibaba.com> <20200211062205-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] virtio-mmio: add notify feature for per-queue Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline To: Jason Wang Cc: Zha Bin , virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, slp@redhat.com, jing2.liu@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, gerry@linux.alibaba.com List-ID: On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:39:54AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >=20 > On 2020/2/11 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=887:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 05:05:17PM +0800, Zha Bin wrote: > > > From: Liu Jiang > > >=20 > > > The standard virtio-mmio devices use notification register to signal > > > backend. This will cause vmexits and slow down the performance when w= e > > > passthrough the virtio-mmio devices to guest virtual machines. > > > We proposed to update virtio over MMIO spec to add the per-queue > > > notify feature VIRTIO_F_MMIO_NOTIFICATION[1]. It can allow the VMM to > > > configure notify location for each queue. > > >=20 > > > [1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/21/31 > > >=20 > > > Signed-off-by: Liu Jiang > > > Co-developed-by: Zha Bin > > > Signed-off-by: Zha Bin > > > Co-developed-by: Jing Liu > > > Signed-off-by: Jing Liu > > > Co-developed-by: Chao Peng > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Peng > > Hmm. Any way to make this static so we don't need > > base and multiplier? >=20 >=20 > E.g page per vq? >=20 > Thanks Problem is, is page size well defined enough? Are there cases where guest and host page sizes differ? I suspect there might be. But I also think this whole patch is unproven. Is someone actually working on QEMU code to support pass-trough of virtio-pci as virtio-mmio for nested guests? What's the performance gain like? --=20 MST --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org