Discussion of the implementations of VIRTIO specification
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: konrad.wilk@oracle.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	jan.kiszka@siemens.com, will@kernel.org,
	stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, tsoni@codeaurora.org,
	pratikp@codeaurora.org, christoffer.dall@arm.com,
	alex.bennee@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH 5/5] virtio: Add bounce DMA ops
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:41:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200428163448-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200428174952.GA5097@quicinc.com>

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:19:52PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> * Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> [2020-04-28 12:17:57]:
> 
> > Okay, but how is all this virtio specific?  For example, why not allow
> > separate swiotlbs for any type of device?
> > For example, this might make sense if a given device is from a
> > different, less trusted vendor.
> 
> Is swiotlb commonly used for multiple devices that may be on different trust
> boundaries (and not behind a hardware iommu)?

Even a hardware iommu does not imply a 100% security from malicious
hardware. First lots of people use iommu=pt for performance reasons.
Second even without pt, unmaps are often batched, and sub-page buffers
might be used for DMA, so we are not 100% protected at all times.


> If so, then yes it sounds like a
> good application of multiple swiotlb pools.
> 
> > All this can then maybe be hidden behind the DMA API.
> 
> Won't we still need some changes to virtio to make use of its own pool (to
> bounce buffers)? Something similar to its own DMA ops proposed in this patch?

If you are doing this for all devices, you need to either find a way
to do this without chaning DMA ops, or by doing some automatic change
to all drivers.


> > > +void virtio_bounce_set_dma_ops(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > +{
> > > +	if (!bounce_buf_paddr)
> > > +		return;
> > > +
> > > +	set_dma_ops(vdev->dev.parent, &virtio_dma_ops);
> > 
> > 
> > I don't think DMA API maintainers will be happy with new users
> > of set_dma_ops.
> 
> Is there an alternate API that is more preffered?

all this is supposed to be part of DMA API itself. new drivers aren't
supposed to have custom DMA ops.

> -- 
> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
> of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-28 20:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1588073958-1793-1-git-send-email-vatsa@codeaurora.org>
     [not found] ` <1588073958-1793-6-git-send-email-vatsa@codeaurora.org>
2020-04-28 16:17   ` [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH 5/5] virtio: Add bounce DMA ops Michael S. Tsirkin
     [not found]     ` <20200428174952.GA5097@quicinc.com>
2020-04-28 20:41       ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
     [not found]         ` <275eba4b-dd35-aa95-b2e3-9c5cbf7c6d71@linux.intel.com>
2020-04-29  4:57           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
     [not found]             ` <b676430c-65b3-096e-ca48-ceebf10f4b28@linux.intel.com>
2020-04-29  6:50               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
     [not found]                 ` <20200429094410.GD5097@quicinc.com>
2020-04-29  9:52                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
     [not found]                     ` <20200429100953.GE5097@quicinc.com>
2020-04-29 10:20                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-04-29 10:26                         ` Jan Kiszka
2020-04-29 10:45                           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-04-29 10:55                             ` Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200428163448-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pratikp@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com \
    --cc=tsoni@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=vatsa@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox