Discussion of the implementations of VIRTIO specification
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Virtio-Dev <virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: queue_enable vs QueueReady
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 02:01:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200601015736-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0592979c-c8ae-fd28-2ddf-e64b135a7292@redhat.com>

On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:06:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Hi:
> 
> I found ambiguity in the virtio specification:
> 
> In PCI part, it describes the queue_enable as:
> 
> The driver uses this to selectively prevent the device from executing
> requests from this virtqueue. 1 - enabled; 0 - disabled.
> 
> In MMIO part, it describes the QueueReady as:
> 
> Writing one (0x1) to this register notifies the device that it can execute
> requests from this virtual queue. Reading from this register returns the
> last value written to it. Both read and write accesses apply to the queue
> selected by writing to QueueSel.
> 
> If I understand this correctly, they have the same meaning, but the driver
> requirements section looks conflict:
> 
> PCI said: The driver MUST NOT write a 0 to queue_enable.
> 
> MMIO said:
> 
> To stop using the queue the driver MUST write zero (0x0) to this QueueReady
> and MUST read the value back to ensure synchronization.
> 
> So we can't disable a queue via queue_enable but QueueReady. Any reason for
> such inconsistency?
> 
> Thanks

PCI assumed device reset is enough to stop all queues.  We had tons of
bugs around shutdown because of this, so in hindsight, MMIO had maybe a
better idea.

Ability to stop a queue and take back buffers would be nice, e.g. serial
is kind of messed up around port disconnect without it.

-- 
MST


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-01  6:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-28 13:06 [virtio-dev] queue_enable vs QueueReady Jason Wang
2020-05-28 14:00 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-05-29  2:57   ` Jason Wang
2020-06-01  6:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2020-06-02  2:57   ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2020-06-02  4:20     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-02  6:46       ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200601015736-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox