From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jie Deng <jie.deng@intel.com>
Cc: virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH v3] virtio-i2c: add the device specification
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:27:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201028072253-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <752795c8-868a-add0-30c0-9d34e542140c@intel.com>
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 03:54:39PM +0800, Jie Deng wrote:
>
> On 2020/10/27 20:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 02:00:24PM +0800, Jie Deng wrote:
> > > virtio-i2c is a virtual I2C adapter device. It provides a way
> > > to flexibly communicate with the I2C slave devices from the guest.
> > >
> > > This patch adds the specification for this device.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jie Deng<jie.deng@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > conformance.tex | 28 ++++++++++++++---
> > > content.tex | 1 +
> > > virtio-i2c.tex | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 3 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100644 virtio-i2c.tex
> > >
> > > +The driver queues requests to the virtqueue, and they are used by the
> > > +device. The request is the representation of one segment of an I2C
> > > +transaction. Each request is of form:
> > > +
> > > +\begin{lstlisting}
> > > +struct virtio_i2c_req {
> > > + le16 addr;
> > > + le16 flags;
> > > + le16 len;
> > > + u8 buf[];
> > > + u8 status;
> > > +};
> > > +\end{lstlisting}
> > > +
> > > +The \field{addr} is the address of the I2C slave device.
> > > +
> > > +The first bit of \field{flags} indicates whether it is a read or write request.
> > > +It means a read request if the first bit of \field{flags} is set, otherwise
> > > +it is a write request. The rest bits of \field{flags} are reserved.
> > > +
> > > +The \field{len} is the number of data bytes in the \field{buf} being read from or
> > > +written to the I2C slave address.
> > > +
> > > +The \field{buf} of the request contains one segment of an I2C transaction.
> > > +If the first bit of \field{flags} is '1', the \field{buf} is written by the
> > > +device and it contains one segment of an I2C transaction being read from the
> > > +device.
> > Let's give a name to the flag then? READ I guess?
> > I guess this means it's an exact reverse of the write-only/read-only
> > flag in the descriptor?
> > I still think it's both a potential source of errors and a waste
> > to have this bit in the device struct when we have a generic one.
> >
> > How about adding some motivation to explain why it's done
> > like this?
> Hmm... It seems the description here is a bit unsatisfactory. I don't mean
> to use this flag
> to play the role of that flag of the descriptor. I just want to encapsulate
> all the i2c_msg fields
> into the request for I2C use. The flag in the descriptor is defined from
> virtio perspective
> while the flag in this request is defined from I2C perspective.
> It may be necessary to reverse the cause and effect:
>
> It seems better to say "If it is a write request (write descriptor), then
> the first bit of the flag in the request should be set to 0."
> than "the first bit of the flag in the request is 0, then it is a write
> request (write descriptor)".
>
> I will try to add more description to make it looks better.
>
> Thanks.
I think it's better to have the device take it from the virtio descriptor though.
Duplicating info just causes bugs ...
>
>
> > > If the first bit of \field{flags} is '0', the \field{buf} is written
> > > +by the driver and it contains one segment of an I2C transaction being written
> > > +to the the device.
> > one the?
> >
> Right. Thanks for your careful review.
>
>
> > more detail on how are multi-segment transactions formed?
> > don't you need flags to start/stop?
> >
> Currently, it is designed to simply transparently transmit
> the "i2c_msg messages" from the frontend OS kernel to the backend.
From spec perspective we don't really care. We also don't
assume driver and device are using linux.
> No need to tag the start/stop segment.
>
> Thanks.
i2c_msg has flags to signal start/stop of multi-segment transactions.
> >
> > > +The final \field{status} byte is written by the device: either VIRTIO_I2C_MSG_OK
> > > +for success or VIRTIO_I2C_MSG_ERR for error.
> > > +
> > > +\begin{lstlisting}
> > > +#define VIRTIO_I2C_MSG_OK 0
> > > +#define VIRTIO_I2C_MSG_ERR 1
> > > +\end{lstlisting}
> > what if one segment in a transaction fails?
>
> The driver shall return the number of segments successfully processed.
>
> Thanks.
where would it return it?
> > > +\drivernormative{\subsubsection}{Device Operation}{Device Types / I2C Adapter Device / Device Operation}
> > > +
> > > +A driver MUST set \field{addr}, \field{flags} and \field{len} before sending
> > > +the request.
> > > +
> > > +A driver MUST place one segment of an I2C transaction into \field{buf} if the
> > > +first bit of \field{flags} is '0'.
> > > +
> > > +A driver MUST NOT use \field{addr}, \field{flags}, \field{len} and \field{buf}
> > > +if the final \field{status} returned from the device is VIRTIO_I2C_MSG_ERR.
> > > +
> > > +A driver MUST queue the requests in order if multiple requests are going to
> > > +be sent at a time.
> > > +
> > > +\devicenormative{\subsubsection}{Device Operation}{Device Types / I2C Adapter Device / Device Operation}
> > > +
> > > +A device MUST NOT change the value of \field{addr}, \field{flags} and \field{len}.
> > > +
> > > +A device MUST place one segment of an I2C transaction into \field{buf} if the first
> > > +bit of \field{flags} is '1'.
> > > +
> > > +A device MUST guarantee the requests being handled in order if multiple requests
> > > +are received.
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4
This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.
In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.
Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-28 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-27 6:00 [virtio-comment] [PATCH v3] virtio-i2c: add the device specification Jie Deng
2020-10-27 12:20 ` [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-10-28 7:54 ` Jie Deng
2020-10-28 11:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2020-10-29 2:20 ` Jie Deng
2020-10-28 20:10 ` [virtio-comment] " Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-29 7:38 ` Jie Deng
2020-11-04 8:05 ` Jie Deng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201028072253-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=jie.deng@intel.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox