From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>,
elic@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: set_features should allow reset to zero
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 05:01:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210223045600-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <788a0880-0a68-20b7-5bdf-f8150b08276a@redhat.com>
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 05:46:20PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2021/2/23 下午5:25, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 09:09:28AM -0800, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2/21/2021 8:14 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > On 2021/2/19 7:54 下午, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
> > > > > Commit 452639a64ad8 ("vdpa: make sure set_features is invoked
> > > > > for legacy") made an exception for legacy guests to reset
> > > > > features to 0, when config space is accessed before features
> > > > > are set. We should relieve the verify_min_features() check
> > > > > and allow features reset to 0 for this case.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's worth noting that not just legacy guests could access
> > > > > config space before features are set. For instance, when
> > > > > feature VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is advertised some modern driver
> > > > > will try to access and validate the MTU present in the config
> > > > > space before virtio features are set.
> > > >
> > > > This looks like a spec violation:
> > > >
> > > > "
> > > >
> > > > The following driver-read-only field, mtu only exists if
> > > > VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is set. This field specifies the maximum MTU for the
> > > > driver to use.
> > > > "
> > > >
> > > > Do we really want to workaround this?
> > > Isn't the commit 452639a64ad8 itself is a workaround for legacy guest?
> > >
> > > I think the point is, since there's legacy guest we'd have to support, this
> > > host side workaround is unavoidable. Although I agree the violating driver
> > > should be fixed (yes, it's in today's upstream kernel which exists for a
> > > while now).
> > Oh you are right:
> >
> >
> > static int virtnet_validate(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > {
> > if (!vdev->config->get) {
> > dev_err(&vdev->dev, "%s failure: config access disabled\n",
> > __func__);
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > if (!virtnet_validate_features(vdev))
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU)) {
> > int mtu = virtio_cread16(vdev,
> > offsetof(struct virtio_net_config,
> > mtu));
> > if (mtu < MIN_MTU)
> > __virtio_clear_bit(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU);
>
>
> I wonder why not simply fail here?
Back in 2016 it went like this:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 05:10:59PM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
> + if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU)) {
> + dev->mtu = virtio_cread16(vdev,
> + offsetof(struct virtio_net_config,
> + mtu));
> + }
> +
> if (vi->any_header_sg)
> dev->needed_headroom = vi->hdr_len;
>
One comment though: I think we should validate the mtu.
If it's invalid, clear VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU and ignore.
Too late at this point :)
I guess it's a way to tell device "I can not live with this MTU",
device can fail FEATURES_OK if it wants to. MIN_MTU
is an internal linux thing and at the time I felt it's better to
try to make progress.
>
> > }
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > And the spec says:
> >
> >
> > The driver MUST follow this sequence to initialize a device:
> > 1. Reset the device.
> > 2. Set the ACKNOWLEDGE status bit: the guest OS has noticed the device.
> > 3. Set the DRIVER status bit: the guest OS knows how to drive the device.
> > 4. Read device feature bits, and write the subset of feature bits understood by the OS and driver to the
> > device. During this step the driver MAY read (but MUST NOT write) the device-specific configuration
> > fields to check that it can support the device before accepting it.
> > 5. Set the FEATURES_OK status bit. The driver MUST NOT accept new feature bits after this step.
> > 6. Re-read device status to ensure the FEATURES_OK bit is still set: otherwise, the device does not
> > support our subset of features and the device is unusable.
> > 7. Perform device-specific setup, including discovery of virtqueues for the device, optional per-bus setup,
> > reading and possibly writing the device’s virtio configuration space, and population of virtqueues.
> > 8. Set the DRIVER_OK status bit. At this point the device is “live”.
> >
> >
> > Item 4 on the list explicitly allows reading config space before
> > FEATURES_OK.
> >
> > I conclude that VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is set means "set in device features".
>
>
> So this probably need some clarification. "is set" is used many times in the
> spec that has different implications.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> >
> > Generally it is worth going over feature dependent config fields
> > and checking whether they should be present when device feature is set
> > or when feature bit has been negotiated, and making this clear.
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-23 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1613735698-3328-1-git-send-email-si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
[not found] ` <605e7d2d-4f27-9688-17a8-d57191752ee7@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <ee31e93b-5fbb-1999-0e82-983d3e49ad1e@oracle.com>
2021-02-23 9:25 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: set_features should allow reset to zero Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-23 9:46 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-23 10:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2021-02-23 10:17 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-24 9:40 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-23 10:04 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-23 10:31 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-23 10:58 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-24 9:29 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-24 11:12 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-25 4:36 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-25 13:26 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-25 18:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-26 8:19 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-28 21:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-03-01 3:51 ` Jason Wang
2021-03-02 12:08 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-03-03 4:01 ` Jason Wang
2021-03-03 8:29 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-03-04 8:24 ` Jason Wang
2021-03-04 13:50 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-03-05 3:01 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210223045600-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=elic@nvidia.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=si-wei.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox