Discussion of the implementations of VIRTIO specification
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	kevin.tian@intel.com
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH] virtio-iommu: Add VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BOOT_BYPASS
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:16:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210322101459-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YDjmALQeAV/ldp9Q@myrica>

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 01:13:52PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 02:11:17PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 06:53:15PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > > Specify the behavior of the device before feature negotiation.
> > > Implementations that allow DMA to bypass the IOMMU during boot inform
> > > the driver by setting the VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BOOT_BYPASS feature.
> > > Negotiating the feature doesn't have any effect.
> > 
> > from spec text it kind of looks like it does, after
> > FEATURES_OK devices are disallowed access?
> 
> Before FEATURES_OK the BOOT_BYPASS feature defines the policy chosen by
> the device implementation.  After FEATURES_OK the driver overrides this
> policy using the BYPASS feature.
> 
> Thinking more about this, we can't redefine F_BYPASS now (QEMU offers it),
> but I'm tempted to deprecate it and replace it with a new feature bit that
> indicates presence of a bypass field in config space. Device sets the byte
> to 0 or 1 to declare its default bypass policy, and driver can override
> this by writing 0 or 1 (currently done by accepting or refusing F_BYPASS).
> It would be a lot cleaner than this.

that sounds reasonable. we don't have a deprecation mechanism
but we can have a non-normative text suggesting this is avoided.

> Or just state that the boot-bypass behavior is up to the implementation
> and leave it at that.

not sure it's a good idea given we already made promises in the spec
and implementations might rely on them for security.

> > > Clarify the description for VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BYPASS while we're at it,
> > > because "downstream of the IOMMU" is confusing.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> > 
> > are the two bypass features dependend on each other then?
> 
> No the device can offer one without the other.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jean
> 
> > 
> > > ---
> > >  virtio-iommu.tex | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/virtio-iommu.tex b/virtio-iommu.tex
> > > index 08b358a..4f34a14 100644
> > > --- a/virtio-iommu.tex
> > > +++ b/virtio-iommu.tex
> > > @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ \subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / IOMMU Device / Feature bits}
> > >    VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_MAP_UNMAP is supported.}
> > >  
> > >  \item[VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BYPASS (3)]
> > > -  When not attached to a domain, endpoints downstream of the IOMMU
> > > +  When not attached to a domain, endpoints managed by the IOMMU
> > >    can access the guest-physical address space.
> > >  
> > >  \item[VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_PROBE (4)]
> > > @@ -67,6 +67,10 @@ \subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / IOMMU Device / Feature bits}
> > >  
> > >  \item[VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_MMIO (5)]
> > >    The VIRTIO_IOMMU_MAP_F_MMIO flag is available.
> > > +
> > > +\item[VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BOOT_BYPASS (6)]
> > > +  Before feature negotiation, endpoints managed by the IOMMU
> > > +  can access the guest-physical address space.
> > >  \end{description}
> > >  
> > >  \drivernormative{\subsubsection}{Feature bits}{Device Types / IOMMU Device / Feature bits}
> > > @@ -114,12 +118,15 @@ \subsection{Device initialization}\label{sec:Device Types / IOMMU Device / Devic
> > >  
> > >  When the device is reset, endpoints are not attached to any domain.
> > >  
> > > -If the VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BYPASS feature is negotiated, all accesses from
> > > -unattached endpoints are allowed and translated by the IOMMU using the
> > > -identity function. If the feature is not negotiated, any memory access
> > > -from an unattached endpoint fails. Upon attaching an endpoint in
> > > -bypass mode to a new domain, any memory access from the endpoint fails,
> > > -since the domain does not contain any mapping.
> > > +Memory accesses from an endpoint bypass the IOMMU, that is all
> > > +accesses are allowed and translated using the identity function,
> > > +in the following cases:
> > > +\begin{itemize}
> > > +\item If the VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BOOT_BYPASS feature is offered and
> > > +  the FEATURES_OK status bit is not set.
> > 
> > confused. so this feature *only* has effect before FEATURES_OK?
> > 
> > 
> > > +\item If the VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BYPASS feature is negotiated and the
> > > +  endpoint is not attached to a domain.
> > > +\end{itemize}
> > >  
> > >  Future devices might support more modes of operation besides MAP/UNMAP.
> > >  Drivers verify that devices set VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_MAP_UNMAP and fail
> > > @@ -136,8 +143,13 @@ \subsection{Device initialization}\label{sec:Device Types / IOMMU Device / Devic
> > >  
> > >  \devicenormative{\subsubsection}{Device Initialization}{Device Types / IOMMU Device / Device Initialization}
> > >  
> > > +If the device does not offer the VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BOOT_BYPASS
> > > +feature, it SHOULD NOT let endpoints access the guest-physical
> > > +address space before feature negotiation is complete.
> > > +
> > >  If the driver does not accept the VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BYPASS feature, the
> > > -device SHOULD NOT let endpoints access the guest-physical address space.
> > > +device SHOULD NOT let endpoints access the guest-physical address space
> > > +after feature negotiation is complete.
> > 
> > 
> > sounds weird as if they are only allowed access before feature
> > negotiation. likely not what you meant.
> > 
> > 
> > >  
> > >  \subsection{Device operations}\label{sec:Device Types / IOMMU Device / Device operations}
> > >  
> > > -- 
> > > 2.30.1
> > 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org


      reply	other threads:[~2021-03-22 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-25 17:53 [virtio-dev] [PATCH] virtio-iommu: Add VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BOOT_BYPASS Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-02-25 19:11 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-26 12:13   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-03-22 14:16     ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210322101459-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox