* [virtio-comment] [PATCH v4 0/1] VIRTIO: Introduce MGMT device and Provision maximum MSI-X vectors for a VF
@ 2022-03-02 16:02 Max Gurtovoy
2022-03-02 16:02 ` [virtio-comment] [PATCH v4 1/1] Introduce MGMT Admin commands Max Gurtovoy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Max Gurtovoy @ 2022-03-02 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: virtio-comment, mst, cohuck, virtio-dev, jasowang
Cc: parav, shahafs, oren, stefanha, Max Gurtovoy
Hi,
In a PCI SR-IOV configuration, MSI-X vectors of the device is precious
device resource. Hence making efficient use of it based on the use case
that aligns to the VM configuration is desired for best system
performance.
For example, today's static assignment of the amount of MSI-X vectors
doesn't allow sophisticated utilization of resources.
A typical cloud provider SR-IOV use case is to create many VFs for
use by guest VMs. Each VM might have a different purpose and different
amount of resources accordingly (e.g. number of CPUs). A common driver
usage of device's MSI-X vectors is proportional to the number of CPUs in
the VM. Since the system administrator might know the amount of CPUs in
the requested VM, he can also configure the VF's MSI-X vectors amount
proportional to the number of CPUs in the VM. In this way, the
utilization of the physical hardware will be improved.
Today we have some operating systems that support provisioning MSI-X
vectors for PCI VFs.
Update the specification to have a method to change the number of MSI-X
vectors supported by a VF using the PF admin virtqueue interface. For that,
we have created a generic admin infrastructure. In this series we extended
it to manage PCI resources of the managed VF by its parent PF.
For that, introduce a new definition of a Management device and a Manged device.
In the future more resources would be provisioned using this mechanism.
The admin virtqueue interface and the virtio subsystem were introduced in
"Introduce virtio subsystem and Admin virtqueue" series in [1].
This series extend the admin command set for management capabilities.
Open issues:
1. Should we have command to reset all VFs vectors to zero before enabling SR-IOV? Yes/No.
If yes, is this optimization command must in current series? Or it can be added later?
[1] https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202203/msg00005.html
---
changes from V3:
- split the seties to 2 parts (virtio subsystem and admin + MSIX configuration and management device)
changes from V2:
1. Addressed below comments from Jason:
- split admin virtqueue section from admin command set section
- added device management section in "Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device"
- mention that management interface may be admin virtqueue (but not a must)
- add MSI-X configuration sequence
2. Addressed below comments from MST:
- added conformance sections
- use decimal instead of hex for bit numbering
- remove the OOO definitions for AQ
- explain more about default configuration of MSI-X for VFs
3. Addressed below comments from Cornelia:
- reword AQ index definitions
- introduce misc config for PCI transport
4. added vfs_assigned_msix_count attr to VIRTIO_ADMIN_PCI_SRIOV_ATTRS cmd
5. removed the net/blk AQ index definitions (not needed in the new model)
6. rebased on top of master branch commit 88895f56e642aca ("Reserve more feature bits for device type usage")
changes from V1:
1. Addressed below comments from MST:
- updated cover letter for admin queue motivation
- removed VIRTIO_F_ADMIN_PCI_VIRT_MANAGER
- simplified admin queue interface by removing
VIRTIO_F_ADMIN_VQ_INDIRECT_DESC/VIRTIO_F_ADMIN_VQ_IN_ORDER feature bits
- added a subsection for VF MSI-X control capability in PCI section
- re-designed interrupt vector management admin commands
- added a mandatory admin command to expose admin capabilities
- improved commit messages
- described error code for unsupported command
- described error code for errors on invalid VF
- described system software requirements for supporting MSI-X configuration
2. Addressed comments from Parav
- extended command opcode to 16-bit
- improve commit messages
3. Added more command specific error codes
Max Gurtovoy (1):
Introduce MGMT Admin commands
admin.tex | 205 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
content.tex | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++
introduction.tex | 25 ++++++
3 files changed, 310 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--
2.21.0
This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.
In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.
Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [virtio-comment] [PATCH v4 1/1] Introduce MGMT Admin commands 2022-03-02 16:02 [virtio-comment] [PATCH v4 0/1] VIRTIO: Introduce MGMT device and Provision maximum MSI-X vectors for a VF Max Gurtovoy @ 2022-03-02 16:02 ` Max Gurtovoy 2022-04-04 13:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2022-04-04 22:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Max Gurtovoy @ 2022-03-02 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: virtio-comment, mst, cohuck, virtio-dev, jasowang Cc: parav, shahafs, oren, stefanha, Max Gurtovoy Introduce the concept of a management and a managed device. A management device supports the VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS and VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST commands to manage some resources of the managed device. Also introduce a new mechanism to issue commands with dst_type field that is not "self". With the new mechanism, driver can set dst_type to 1 and use the the vdev_id common field to describe the target vdev_id. This mechanism is useful for virtio subsystems with multiple devices with various different capabilities. For example, a virtio subsystem that contains a PCI PF and its VF. For this subsystem, a clever system administrator can use admin commands to map between a vdev_id and a VF number and use it to manipulate the VF resources. As we know, a typical cloud provider SR-IOV use case is to create many VFs for use by guest VMs. The VFs may not be assigned to a VM until a user requests a VM of a certain size, e.g., number of CPUs. A VF may need MSI-X vectors proportional to the number of CPUs in the VM, but there is no standard way today in the spec to change the number of MSI-X vectors supported by a VF, although there are some operating systems that support this. The new admin mechanism manages the MSI-X interrupt vectors assignments of a managed PCI device (i.e. VF) by its management devices (i.e. its parent PF) but can easily extended to any other generic resource management. Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> --- admin.tex | 205 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- content.tex | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++ introduction.tex | 25 ++++++ 3 files changed, 310 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/admin.tex b/admin.tex index ed9f6bd..f069dd5 100644 --- a/admin.tex +++ b/admin.tex @@ -9,11 +9,13 @@ \section{Admin command set}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admi le16 command; /* * 0 - self - * 1 - 65535 are reserved + * 1 - other virtio device in the same subsystem (described by vdev_id) + * 2 - 65535 are reserved */ le16 dst_type; + le64 vdev_id; /* reserved for common cmd fields */ - u8 reserved[20]; + u8 reserved[12]; u8 command_specific_data[]; /* Device-writable part */ @@ -37,9 +39,12 @@ \section{Admin command set}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admi \hline 03h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_INVALID_FIELD & invalid field was set \\ \hline +04h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_INVALID_VDEV_ID & invalid vdev_id was set \\ +\hline + \end{tabular} -The \field{command}, \field{dst_type} and \field{command_specific_data} are +The \field{command}, \field{dst_type}, \field{vdev_id} and \field{command_specific_data} are set by the driver, and the device sets the \field{status}, the \field{command_specific_error} and the \field{command_specific_result}, if needed. @@ -48,9 +53,12 @@ \section{Admin command set}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admi The mandatory fields to be set by the driver, for all admin commands, are \field{command} and \field{dst_type}. +The optional unused fields to be zeroed by the driver. + The \field{command} defines the opcode for the command. The value for each command can be found in each command section. -The \field{dst_type} defines the target virtio device for the command. This value should be set to 0 (self). +The \field{dst_type} defines the target virtio device for the command. This value can be set to 0 (self) or 1 (other virtio device in the same subsystem). +If \field{dst_type} is set to 1, the \field{vdev_id} is valid and used to describe the vdev_id of the target virtio device. The \field{command_specific_error} should be inspected by the driver only if \field{status} is set to VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_CS_ERR by the device. In this case, the content of \field{command_specific_error} @@ -69,12 +77,25 @@ \section{Admin command set}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admi \hline 0002h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_INFO & O \\ \hline -0003h - 7FFFh & Generic admin cmds & - \\ +0003h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT & O \\ +\hline +0004h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS & O \\ +\hline +0005h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS & O \\ +\hline +0006h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST & O \\ +\hline +0007h - 7FFFh & Generic admin cmds & - \\ \hline 8000h - FFFFh & Reserved & - \\ \hline \end{tabular} +\begin{note} +{The following commands are mandatory for management devices: VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_IDENTIFY, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_INFO, +VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS and VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST.} +\end{note} + \subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE IDENTIFY command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE IDENTIFY command} The VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_IDENTIFY command has no command specific data set by the driver. @@ -89,7 +110,9 @@ \subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE IDENTIFY command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of * (1 means that field was returned): * Bit 0 - vdev_id * Bit 1 - optional_caps_support - * Bits 2 - 63 - reserved for future fields + * Bit 2 - num_supported_managed_vdevs + * Bit 3 - max_managed_vdev_id + * Bits 4 - 63 - reserved for future fields */ le64 attrs_mask; le64 vdev_id; @@ -97,10 +120,16 @@ \subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE IDENTIFY command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of * capabilities are supported by the device: * Bit 0 - if set, VIRTIO_ADMIN_SUBSYSTEM_IDENTIFY supported * Bit 1 - if set, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_INFO supported - * Bits 2 - 63 - reserved for future capabilities. + * Bit 2 - if set, the device is a direct management device + * Bits 3 - 63 - reserved for future capabilities. */ le64 optional_caps_support; - u8 reserved[4072]; + /* Number of supported managed virtio devices by the target virtio device */ + le64 num_supported_managed_vdevs; + /* Maximum value of a valid managed vdev_id for the target virtio device */ + le64 max_managed_vdev_id; + + u8 reserved[4056]; }; \end{lstlisting} @@ -158,6 +187,166 @@ \subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE INFO command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Vi specification and can't be equal to zero. If bit 0 is not set, the driver will ignore \field{vf_number}.} \end{note} +\subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT command} + +The VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT command is used by a management device to manage resources of other virtio devices within +the virtio subsystem. +The \field{command} is set to VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT. + +The command specific data set by the driver is of form: +\begin{lstlisting} +struct virtio_admin_device_mgmt_data { + /* + * 0 - reserved + * 1 - assign resource to the subject vdev_id + * 2 - query resource of the subject vdev_id + * 3 - 255 are reserved + */ + u8 operation; + /* + * 0 - MSI-X vector + * 1 - 65535 are reserved + */ + le16 resource; + /* The amount of elements for the operation to the given resource */ + le32 resource_count; + u8 reserved[57]; +}; +\end{lstlisting} + +The following table describes the command specific error codes codes: + +\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} +\hline +Opcode & Status & Description \\ +\hline \hline +00h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_CS_ERR_VDEV_IN_USE & target device is in use, operation failed \\ +\hline +01h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_CS_ERR_RSC_COUNT_EXCEED & resource count exceed the max possible value \\ +\hline +02h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_CS_ERR_NO_RSC & Mgmt device don't have requested resource count \\ +\hline +03h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_CS_RSC_UNSUPPORTED & unsupported or invalid resource \\ +\hline +04h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_CS_OP_UNSUPPORTED & unsupported or invalid operation \\ +\hline +05h - FFh & Reserved & - \\ +\hline +\end{tabular} + +This command, upon success, returns a data buffer that describes the information according to the requested operation. +This information is of form: +\begin{lstlisting} +struct virtio_admin_device_mgmt_result { + le32 resource_count; + u8 reserved[12]; +}; +\end{lstlisting} + +If the requested operation was "assign resource to the subject vdev_id", the resource_count will return the count of the assigned +resources to the subject vdev_id. Upon success, this value should be equal to the \field{resource_count} of the virtio_admin_device_mgmt_data +structure. In case of a failure, the value of this field is undefined. + +If the requested operation was "query resource of the subject vdev_id", the resource_count will return the count of the currently assigned +resources to the subject vdev_id upon success. In case of a failure, the value of this field is undefined. + +\begin{note} +{MSI-X vector resource type is valid only for PCI devices. VIRTIO_ADMIN_CS_RSC_UNSUPPORTED error is +returned when the destination device is not a PCI device.} +\end{note} + +\begin{note} +{For this command, if setting \field{resource} to MSI-X vector type, the \field{vdev_id} can't be associated to a Virtual Function with +VF index greater than NumVFs value as defined in the PCI specification or smaller than 1. An error is returned when \field{vdev_id} is out of the range.} +\end{note} + +\subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT CAPS command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT CAPS command} + +The VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS upon success, returns a data buffer that describes the management device capabilities. +The \field{command} is set to VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS. + +Upon success, the returned data buffer is of form: +\begin{lstlisting} +struct virtio_admin_device_mgmt_caps_result { + /* + * caps[0] - Bit 0, if set, MSI-X vector resource mgmt is supported + * Bit 1 - Bit 7 are reserved + * caps[1] - Bit 0 - Bit 7 are reserved + * caps[2] - Bit 0 - Bit 7 are reserved + * .... + * caps[8191] - Bit 0 - Bit 7 are reserved + */ + u8 caps[8191]; +}; +\end{lstlisting} + +\begin{note} +{MSI-X vector resource management is applicable only for PCI devices. Thus, MSI-X vector resource +capability bit can be set to 1 only if the subject vdev_id is a management device that can manage PCI devices (e.g. PCI Physical Function virtio device). +For more details on MSI-X vector management support see section \ref{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Admin command set / MSI-X vector management}.} +\end{note} + +\subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT ATTRS command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT ATTRS command} + +The VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS upon success, returns a data buffer that describes the management device attributes. +The \field{command} is set to VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS. + +Upon success, the returned data buffer is of form: +\begin{lstlisting} +struct virtio_admin_device_mgmt_attrs_result { + /* For compatibility - indicates which of the below fields were returned + * (1 means that field was returned): + * Bit 0 - vfs_total_msix_count + * Bit 1 - vfs_assigned_msix_count + * Bit 2 - per_vf_max_msix_count + * Bits 3 - 63 - reserved for future fields + */ + le64 attrs_mask; + + /* Total number of msix vectors for the total number of VFs */ + le32 vfs_total_msix_count; + /* Assigned number of msix vectors for the enabled VFs */ + le32 vfs_assigned_msix_count; + /* Max number of msix vectors that can be assigned for a single VF */ + le16 per_vf_max_msix_count; + + u8 reserved[4078]; +}; +\end{lstlisting} + +\begin{note} +{The \field{vfs_total_msix_count}, \field{vfs_assigned_msix_count} and \field{per_vf_max_msix_count} returned if the +subject vdev_id is a management device that can allocate/deallocate MSI-X resources for PCI VFs devices. +Otherwise, the associated bits in \field{attrs_mask} are zeroed.} +\end{note} + +\subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN MANAGED DEVICE LIST command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN MANAGED DEVICE LIST command} + +The VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST upon success, returns a data buffer that describes an ordered list of up to 510 managed +virtio devices, in ascending order, that can be managed by the target management virtio device. +The returned list contain device identifiers with vdev_id greater than or equal to the value of \field{first_vdev_id} in the command specific data. +The \field{command} is set to VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST. + +The command specific data set by the driver is of form: +\begin{lstlisting} +struct virtio_admin_managed_device_list_data { + le64 first_vdev_id; +}; +\end{lstlisting} + +Upon success, the returned data buffer is of form: +\begin{lstlisting} +struct virtio_admin_managed_device_list_result { + /* Number of entries in the vdev_ids list */ + le16 num_identifiers; + /* Number of currently valid managed virtio devices by the target virtio device */ + le64 num_managed_vdevs; + u8 reserved[6]; + /* List of managed vdev_ids. Only first num_identifiers are valid. */ + le64 vdev_ids[510]; +}; +\end{lstlisting} + \section{Admin Virtqueues}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin Virtqueues} An admin virtqueue is a management interface of a device that can be used to send administrative diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex index bf46192..27353ba 100644 --- a/content.tex +++ b/content.tex @@ -451,6 +451,19 @@ \section{Exporting Objects}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Expo \input{admin.tex} +\section{Device management}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Device management} + +A virtio subsystem might be consist of one or more virtio devices. For example, virtio PCI PF and its VFS compose a virtio subsystem. +A capable PCI PF device might act as the management device in the subsystem, and its PCI VFs are the managed devices. +A management device might have various management capabilities and attributes to manage its managed devices. The capabilities exposed +in the result of VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS command (see section \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT CAPS command} +for more details) and the attributes in the result of VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS command (see section \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT ATTRS command} +for more details). The list of the managed devices returned in the result of VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST command +(see section \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN MANAGED DEVICE LIST command}) + +The management device will use the VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT admin command to manage its managed devices (see section +\ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT command} for more details). + \chapter{General Initialization And Device Operation}\label{sec:General Initialization And Device Operation} We start with an overview of device initialization, then expand on the @@ -1759,6 +1772,81 @@ \subsubsection{Driver Handling Interrupts}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / \end{itemize} \end{itemize} +\subsection{PCI-specific Admin capabilities}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Admin capabilities} + +This documents the group of Admin capabilities for PCI virtio devices. Each capability is +implemented using one or more Admin queue commands. + +\subsubsection{MSI-X vector management}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Admin command set / MSI-X vector management} + +This capability enables a virtio management device to control the assignment of MSI-X interrupt vectors +for its managed devices. In PCI, a management device can be the PF device and the managed device can be the VF. +Capable management devices will need to implement VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS +and VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST admin commands, report the MSI-X attributes in the result of VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS and report that MSI-X +vector resource management is supported by setting bit 1 of caps[0] in the result of VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS admin command. +See sections \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT CAPS command} and +\ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT ATTRS command} for more details. + +In the result of VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS admin command, a capable management device will return the total number of +msix vectors for its VFs in \field{vfs_total_msix_count} field, the number of already assigned msix vectors for its VFs in +\field{vfs_assigned_msix_count} field and also the maximal number of msix vectors that can be assigned for a single VF in +\field{per_vf_max_msix_count} field. In addition, bit 0, bit 1 and bit 2 are set to indicate on the validity of the other 3 +fields in the \field{attrs_mask} field of the result buffer. +See section \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT ATTRS command} for more details. + +In the result of VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST admin command, a capable management device will return a list of associated managed virtio devices. +See section \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN MANAGED DEVICE LIST command} for more details. + +A management device that supports VFs MSI-X vector management capability, will allocate MSI-X resources provided by the parent PF of the SR-IOV VFs. +The default assignment of the MSI-X vectors for managed devices is out of the scope of this specification. +A driver, using VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT can update the MSI-X assignment for a specific managed device. +In the data of VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT admin command, a driver set the \field{resource} type to be MSI-X vector and the +amount of MSI-X interrupt vectors to configure to the subject managed device in \field{resource_count}. The managed device id is set to \field{vdev_id} field. + +A successful operation guarantees that the requested amount of MSI-X interrupt vectors was assigned to the subject management device. +This value is also returned in the virtio_admin_device_mgmt_result structure. +Also, a successful operation guarantees that the MSI-X capability access by the subject PCI device defined by the PCI specification must reflect +the new configuration in all relevant fields. For example, by default if the PCI VF has been assigned 4 MSI-X vectors, and VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT +increases the MSI-X vectors to 8; on this change, reading Table size field of the MSI-X message control register will reflect a value of 7. + +It is beyond the scope of the virtio specification to define necessary synchronization in system software to ensure that a virtio PCI VF device +interrupt configuration modification is reflected in the PCI device. However, it is expected that any modern system software implementing virtio +drivers and PCI subsystem will ensure that any changes occurring in the VF interrupt configuration is either updated in the PCI VF device or +such configuration fails. + +To query amount of MSI-X interrupt vectors that is currently assigned to a managed device, the driver issue VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT with \field{operation} set to +"query resource of the subject vdev_id" value (== 2). The driver also set the \field{resource} type to be MSI-X vector and the managed device id is set to \field{vdev_id} +field. In the result of a successful operation, the amount of MSI-X interrupt vectors that is currently assigned to the subject managed device is +returned by the device in \field{resource_count} field of the virtio_admin_device_mgmt_result structure. +See section \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT command} for more details. + +\paragraph{MSI-X configuration sequence example}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Admin command set / VF MSI-X control / MSI-X configuration sequence example } + +A typical sequence for configuring MSI-X vectors for PCI VFs using MSI-X vector management mechanism is following: + +\begin{enumerate} +\item Ensure that driver doesn't run and it is safe to change MSI-X (e.g. disable sriov auto probing) + +\item Load the PF driver + +\item Enable SR-IOV by following the PCI specification + +\item Query the management device capabilities using commands VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_IDENTIFY, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS and VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS + +\item Find the managed VF vdev_id using commands VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST and VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_INFO + +\item Query the VF MSI-X configuration using command VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT (query operation) + +\item Assign desired MSI-X configuration for the VF using command VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT (assign operation) + +\item After successful completion of the assignment, load the VF driver + +\item Assign the VF to a VM + +\item After VM/VF use is completed, user assigns different MSI-X value and repeats the steps of 7 onwards + +\end{enumerate} + \section{Virtio Over MMIO}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over MMIO} Virtual environments without PCI support (a common situation in diff --git a/introduction.tex b/introduction.tex index 94dd7a2..b5906c8 100644 --- a/introduction.tex +++ b/introduction.tex @@ -260,5 +260,30 @@ \subsection{virtio subsystem}\label{sec:Introduction / Definitions / virtio subs VQN and vdev_id are exposed via Admin Command Set. +\subsection{virtio management device}\label{sec:Introduction / Definitions / virtio management device} + +A virtio device that supports VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS and +VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST Admin commands and can manage a virtio managed device. +A virtio subsystem may contain zero or more management devices. + +A PCI SR-IOV Physical Function based virtio device is an example of a possible virtio management device. + +\subsection{virtio direct management device}\label{sec:Introduction / Definitions / virtio direct management device} + +A virtio management device that can set \field{dst_type} to 0 (self) and to 1 (other virtio device in the same subsystem), and set \field{vdev_id} to an id that corresponds with +one of its managed virtio devices for the following admin commands (if these fields are applicable): VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_IDENTIFY, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_INFO +and VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT. + +The managed device list can be queried using VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST. + +A virtio subsystem may contain zero or more direct management devices. + +\subsection{virtio managed device}\label{sec:Introduction / Definitions / virtio managed device} + +A virtio device that can be managed by a virtio management device. +A virtio subsystem may contain zero or more managed devices. + +A PCI SR-IOV Virtual Function based virtio device is an example of a possible virtio managed device. + \newpage -- 2.21.0 This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC. In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required before posting. Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/ Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/ Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/ ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] Introduce MGMT Admin commands 2022-03-02 16:02 ` [virtio-comment] [PATCH v4 1/1] Introduce MGMT Admin commands Max Gurtovoy @ 2022-04-04 13:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2022-04-04 17:08 ` Max Gurtovoy 2022-04-04 22:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2022-04-04 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Max Gurtovoy Cc: virtio-comment, cohuck, virtio-dev, jasowang, parav, shahafs, oren, stefanha On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 06:02:37PM +0200, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > Introduce the concept of a management and a managed device. A > management device supports the VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT, > VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS and > VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST commands to manage some resources of > the managed device. > > Also introduce a new mechanism to issue commands with dst_type field > that is not "self". With the new mechanism, driver can set dst_type to 1 > and use the the vdev_id common field to describe the target vdev_id. > > This mechanism is useful for virtio subsystems with multiple devices > with various different capabilities. For example, a virtio subsystem > that contains a PCI PF and its VF. For this subsystem, a clever system > administrator can use admin commands to map between a vdev_id and a VF > number and use it to manipulate the VF resources. > > As we know, a typical cloud provider SR-IOV use case is to create many > VFs for use by guest VMs. The VFs may not be assigned to a VM until a > user requests a VM of a certain size, e.g., number of CPUs. A VF may > need MSI-X vectors proportional to the number of CPUs in the VM, but > there is no standard way today in the spec to change the number of MSI-X > vectors supported by a VF, although there are some operating systems > that support this. > > The new admin mechanism manages the MSI-X interrupt vectors assignments > of a managed PCI device (i.e. VF) by its management devices (i.e. its > parent PF) but can easily extended to any other generic resource > management. > > Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com> > Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> > --- > admin.tex | 205 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > content.tex | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++ > introduction.tex | 25 ++++++ > 3 files changed, 310 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/admin.tex b/admin.tex > index ed9f6bd..f069dd5 100644 > --- a/admin.tex > +++ b/admin.tex > @@ -9,11 +9,13 @@ \section{Admin command set}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admi > le16 command; > /* > * 0 - self > - * 1 - 65535 are reserved > + * 1 - other virtio device in the same subsystem (described by vdev_id) > + * 2 - 65535 are reserved > */ > le16 dst_type; > + le64 vdev_id; alignment issues here. Also can we rename dst_type and vdev_id so they are consistent? dst_id maybe? > /* reserved for common cmd fields */ > - u8 reserved[20]; > + u8 reserved[12]; > u8 command_specific_data[]; > > /* Device-writable part */ Oh ok, so this is in there as I suggested in the other email. Good. The way it's split makes review a bit hard ... maybe the aspects dealing with vdev_id can be moved to a previous patch in the next version. not critical. > @@ -37,9 +39,12 @@ \section{Admin command set}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admi > \hline > 03h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_INVALID_FIELD & invalid field was set \\ > \hline > +04h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_INVALID_VDEV_ID & invalid vdev_id was set \\ > +\hline > + > \end{tabular} > > -The \field{command}, \field{dst_type} and \field{command_specific_data} are > +The \field{command}, \field{dst_type}, \field{vdev_id} and \field{command_specific_data} are > set by the driver, and the device sets the \field{status}, the > \field{command_specific_error} and the \field{command_specific_result}, > if needed. > @@ -48,9 +53,12 @@ \section{Admin command set}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admi > > The mandatory fields to be set by the driver, for all admin commands, are \field{command} and \field{dst_type}. > > +The optional unused fields to be zeroed by the driver. > + it's not clear what does this refer to. > The \field{command} defines the opcode for the command. The value for each command can be found in each command section. > > -The \field{dst_type} defines the target virtio device for the command. This value should be set to 0 (self). > +The \field{dst_type} defines the target virtio device for the command. This value can be set to 0 (self) or 1 (other virtio device in the same subsystem). other -> anothere > +If \field{dst_type} is set to 1, the \field{vdev_id} is valid and used to describe the vdev_id of the target virtio device. > > The \field{command_specific_error} should be inspected by the driver only if \field{status} is set to > VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_CS_ERR by the device. In this case, the content of \field{command_specific_error} > @@ -69,12 +77,25 @@ \section{Admin command set}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admi > \hline > 0002h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_INFO & O \\ > \hline > -0003h - 7FFFh & Generic admin cmds & - \\ > +0003h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT & O \\ > +\hline > +0004h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS & O \\ > +\hline > +0005h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS & O \\ > +\hline > +0006h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST & O \\ > +\hline > +0007h - 7FFFh & Generic admin cmds & - \\ > \hline > 8000h - FFFFh & Reserved & - \\ > \hline > \end{tabular} > > +\begin{note} > +{The following commands are mandatory for management devices: pls start with an explanation of what is a management device. > VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_IDENTIFY, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_INFO, > +VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS and VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST.} > +\end{note} > + > \subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE IDENTIFY command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE IDENTIFY command} > > The VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_IDENTIFY command has no command specific data set by the driver. > @@ -89,7 +110,9 @@ \subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE IDENTIFY command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of > * (1 means that field was returned): > * Bit 0 - vdev_id > * Bit 1 - optional_caps_support > - * Bits 2 - 63 - reserved for future fields > + * Bit 2 - num_supported_managed_vdevs > + * Bit 3 - max_managed_vdev_id > + * Bits 4 - 63 - reserved for future fields > */ > le64 attrs_mask; > le64 vdev_id; > @@ -97,10 +120,16 @@ \subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE IDENTIFY command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of > * capabilities are supported by the device: > * Bit 0 - if set, VIRTIO_ADMIN_SUBSYSTEM_IDENTIFY supported > * Bit 1 - if set, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_INFO supported > - * Bits 2 - 63 - reserved for future capabilities. > + * Bit 2 - if set, the device is a direct management device > + * Bits 3 - 63 - reserved for future capabilities. > */ > le64 optional_caps_support; > - u8 reserved[4072]; > + /* Number of supported managed virtio devices by the target virtio device */ > + le64 num_supported_managed_vdevs; > + /* Maximum value of a valid managed vdev_id for the target virtio device */ > + le64 max_managed_vdev_id; I thought there's another command in another patchset that gives the max vdev id. > + > + u8 reserved[4056]; > }; > \end{lstlisting} > > @@ -158,6 +187,166 @@ \subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE INFO command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Vi > specification and can't be equal to zero. If bit 0 is not set, the driver will ignore \field{vf_number}.} > \end{note} > > +\subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT command} > + > +The VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT command is used by a management device to manage resources of other virtio devices within > +the virtio subsystem. "manage" used too many times here, pls find another synonim. > +The \field{command} is set to VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT. This seems to just repeat VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT 3 times in a raw. I think we need a bit more structure, e.g. chapters refer to functionality not specific commands. E.g. look at how control vq is defined for net. > + > +The command specific data set by the driver is of form: of the form > +\begin{lstlisting} > +struct virtio_admin_device_mgmt_data { > + /* > + * 0 - reserved > + * 1 - assign resource to the subject vdev_id > + * 2 - query resource of the subject vdev_id subject? same as target? same as destination? > + * 3 - 255 are reserved > + */ > + u8 operation; > + /* > + * 0 - MSI-X vector > + * 1 - 65535 are reserved > + */ > + le16 resource; > + /* The amount of elements for the operation to the given resource */ > + le32 resource_count; > + u8 reserved[57]; > +}; > +\end{lstlisting} > + > +The following table describes the command specific error codes codes: > + > +\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} > +\hline > +Opcode & Status & Description \\ > +\hline \hline > +00h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_CS_ERR_VDEV_IN_USE & target device is in use, operation failed \\ > +\hline > +01h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_CS_ERR_RSC_COUNT_EXCEED & resource count exceed the max possible value \\ > +\hline > +02h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_CS_ERR_NO_RSC & Mgmt device don't have requested resource count \\ > +\hline > +03h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_CS_RSC_UNSUPPORTED & unsupported or invalid resource \\ > +\hline > +04h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_CS_OP_UNSUPPORTED & unsupported or invalid operation \\ > +\hline > +05h - FFh & Reserved & - \\ > +\hline > +\end{tabular} > + > +This command, upon success, returns a data buffer that describes the information according to the requested operation. > +This information is of form: > +\begin{lstlisting} > +struct virtio_admin_device_mgmt_result { > + le32 resource_count; > + u8 reserved[12]; > +}; > +\end{lstlisting} > + > +If the requested operation was "assign resource to the subject vdev_id", the resource_count will return the count of the assigned > +resources to the subject vdev_id. Upon success, this value should be equal to the \field{resource_count} of the virtio_admin_device_mgmt_data > +structure. In case of a failure, the value of this field is undefined. > + > +If the requested operation was "query resource of the subject vdev_id", the resource_count will return the count of the currently assigned > +resources to the subject vdev_id upon success. In case of a failure, the value of this field is undefined. > + > +\begin{note} > +{MSI-X vector resource type is valid only for PCI devices. VIRTIO_ADMIN_CS_RSC_UNSUPPORTED error is > +returned when the destination device is not a PCI device.} > +\end{note} > + > +\begin{note} > +{For this command, if setting \field{resource} to MSI-X vector type, the \field{vdev_id} can't be associated to a Virtual Function with > +VF index greater than NumVFs value as defined in the PCI specification or smaller than 1. An error is returned when \field{vdev_id} is out of the range.} > +\end{note} > + > +\subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT CAPS command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT CAPS command} > + > +The VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS upon success, returns a data buffer that describes the management device capabilities. > +The \field{command} is set to VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS. > + > +Upon success, the returned data buffer is of form: > +\begin{lstlisting} > +struct virtio_admin_device_mgmt_caps_result { > + /* > + * caps[0] - Bit 0, if set, MSI-X vector resource mgmt is supported > + * Bit 1 - Bit 7 are reserved > + * caps[1] - Bit 0 - Bit 7 are reserved > + * caps[2] - Bit 0 - Bit 7 are reserved > + * .... > + * caps[8191] - Bit 0 - Bit 7 are reserved > + */ > + u8 caps[8191]; > +}; > +\end{lstlisting} > + > +\begin{note} > +{MSI-X vector resource management is applicable only for PCI devices. Thus, MSI-X vector resource > +capability bit can be set to 1 only if the subject vdev_id is a management device that can manage PCI devices (e.g. PCI Physical Function virtio device). > +For more details on MSI-X vector management support see section \ref{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Admin command set / MSI-X vector management}.} > +\end{note} > + > +\subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT ATTRS command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT ATTRS command} > + > +The VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS upon success, returns a data buffer that describes the management device attributes. > +The \field{command} is set to VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS. > + > +Upon success, the returned data buffer is of form: > +\begin{lstlisting} > +struct virtio_admin_device_mgmt_attrs_result { > + /* For compatibility - indicates which of the below fields were returned > + * (1 means that field was returned): > + * Bit 0 - vfs_total_msix_count > + * Bit 1 - vfs_assigned_msix_count > + * Bit 2 - per_vf_max_msix_count > + * Bits 3 - 63 - reserved for future fields > + */ > + le64 attrs_mask; > + > + /* Total number of msix vectors for the total number of VFs */ > + le32 vfs_total_msix_count; > + /* Assigned number of msix vectors for the enabled VFs */ > + le32 vfs_assigned_msix_count; > + /* Max number of msix vectors that can be assigned for a single VF */ > + le16 per_vf_max_msix_count; > + > + u8 reserved[4078]; > +}; > +\end{lstlisting} > + > +\begin{note} > +{The \field{vfs_total_msix_count}, \field{vfs_assigned_msix_count} and \field{per_vf_max_msix_count} returned if the > +subject vdev_id is a management device that can allocate/deallocate MSI-X resources for PCI VFs devices. > +Otherwise, the associated bits in \field{attrs_mask} are zeroed.} > +\end{note} > + > +\subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN MANAGED DEVICE LIST command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN MANAGED DEVICE LIST command} > + > +The VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST upon success, returns a data buffer that describes an ordered list of up to 510 managed > +virtio devices, in ascending order, that can be managed by the target management virtio device. So 510 might be quite limited. Do we really need such a degree of flexibility? Why not just have all numbers 0 to X? > +The returned list contain device identifiers with vdev_id greater than or equal to the value of \field{first_vdev_id} in the command specific data. > +The \field{command} is set to VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST. > + > +The command specific data set by the driver is of form: > +\begin{lstlisting} > +struct virtio_admin_managed_device_list_data { > + le64 first_vdev_id; > +}; > +\end{lstlisting} So this is a way to iterate over devices in groups of 510. It's not terrible but why not just allow a bigger buffer? > + > +Upon success, the returned data buffer is of form: > +\begin{lstlisting} > +struct virtio_admin_managed_device_list_result { > + /* Number of entries in the vdev_ids list */ > + le16 num_identifiers; > + /* Number of currently valid managed virtio devices by the target virtio device */ > + le64 num_managed_vdevs; alignment issues here. > + u8 reserved[6]; > + /* List of managed vdev_ids. Only first num_identifiers are valid. */ > + le64 vdev_ids[510]; > +}; > +\end{lstlisting} > + > \section{Admin Virtqueues}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin Virtqueues} > > An admin virtqueue is a management interface of a device that can be used to send administrative > diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex > index bf46192..27353ba 100644 > --- a/content.tex > +++ b/content.tex > @@ -451,6 +451,19 @@ \section{Exporting Objects}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Expo > > \input{admin.tex} > > +\section{Device management}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Device management} > + > +A virtio subsystem might be consist might consist? > of one or more virtio devices. what does might imply here? when does it and when does it not? > For example, virtio PCI PF and its VFS compose a virtio subsystem. it's not just an example, is it? it's actually described in the following text. > +A capable PCI PF device might act as the management device in the subsystem, and its PCI VFs are the managed devices. > +A management device might have various management capabilities and attributes to manage its managed devices. The capabilities exposed > +in the result of VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS command (see section \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT CAPS command} > +for more details) and the attributes in the result of VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS command (see section \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT ATTRS command} > +for more details). The list of the managed devices returned in the result of VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST command > +(see section \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN MANAGED DEVICE LIST command}) > + > +The management device will use the VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT admin command to manage its managed devices (see section > +\ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT command} for more details). > + Please find a way not to rephrase above section so as not to repeat "manage" more than once in a sentence. > \chapter{General Initialization And Device Operation}\label{sec:General Initialization And Device Operation} > > We start with an overview of device initialization, then expand on the > @@ -1759,6 +1772,81 @@ \subsubsection{Driver Handling Interrupts}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / > \end{itemize} > \end{itemize} > > +\subsection{PCI-specific Admin capabilities}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Admin capabilities} > + > +This documents the group of Admin capabilities for PCI virtio devices. what does "this" refer to? what documents? > Each capability is > +implemented using one or more Admin queue commands. > + > +\subsubsection{MSI-X vector management}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Admin command set / MSI-X vector management} > + > +This capability enables a virtio management device to control the assignment of MSI-X interrupt vectors > +for its managed devices. In PCI, a management device can be the PF device and the managed device can be the VF. .. or? can they be something else? > +Capable management devices will need to implement VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS > +and VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST admin commands, report the MSI-X attributes what are these attributes? > in the result of VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS and report that MSI-X > +vector resource management is supported by setting bit 1 of caps[0] in the result of VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS admin command. > +See sections \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT CAPS command} and > +\ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT ATTRS command} for more details. > + > +In the result of VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS admin command, a capable management device will return the total number of > +msix vectors for its VFs in \field{vfs_total_msix_count} field, are these always VFs then? does this include the PF itself? > the number of already assigned msix vectors for its VFs in > +\field{vfs_assigned_msix_count} field and also the maximal number of msix vectors that can be assigned for a single VF in > +\field{per_vf_max_msix_count} field. In addition, bit 0, bit 1 and bit 2 are set to indicate on the validity indicate is transitive. indicate the validity > of the other 3 > +fields in the \field{attrs_mask} field of the result buffer. > +See section \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT ATTRS command} for more details. > + > +In the result of VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST admin command, a capable management device will return a list of associated managed virtio devices. > +See section \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN MANAGED DEVICE LIST command} for more details. > + > +A management device that supports VFs MSI-X vector management capability "VF" since you have reduced relative here Is this then MSI-X vector management capability or a VF MSI-X vector management capability? >, will allocate MSI-X resources provided by the parent PF of the SR-IOV VFs. > +The default assignment of the MSI-X vectors for managed devices is out of the scope of this specification. I don't see why it's out of scope. Maybe it's up to the device. But please don't declare whatever is not spefified out of scope automatically. And, I think it's relevant to be able to query what has been set or what the default was. add a command for that? > +A driver, using VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT can update the MSI-X assignment for a specific managed device. > +In the data of VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT admin command, a driver set sets? > the \field{resource} type to be MSI-X vector and the > +amount of MSI-X interrupt vectors to configure to the subject managed device in \field{resource_count}. The managed device id is set to \field{vdev_id} field. > + > +A successful operation guarantees that the requested amount of MSI-X interrupt vectors was assigned to the subject management device. > +This value is also returned in the virtio_admin_device_mgmt_result structure. > +Also, a successful operation guarantees that the MSI-X capability access by the subject PCI device defined by the PCI specification must reflect > +the new configuration in all relevant fields. For example, by default if the PCI VF has been assigned 4 MSI-X vectors, and VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT > +increases the MSI-X vectors to 8; on this change, reading Table size field of the MSI-X message control register will reflect a value of 7. > + > +It is beyond the scope of the virtio specification Let's leave the question of scope aside. Instead, please explain that system software needs to use system specific means to do that. > to define > necessary synchronization in system software to ensure that a virtio > PCI VF device > +interrupt configuration modification is reflected in the PCI device. However, it is expected that any modern system software implementing virtio > +drivers and PCI subsystem will ensure that any changes occurring in the VF interrupt configuration is either updated in the PCI VF device or > +such configuration fails. > + > +To query amount of MSI-X interrupt vectors that is currently assigned to a managed device, the driver issue issues > VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT with \field{operation} set to > +"query resource of the subject vdev_id" value (== 2). The driver also set the \field{resource} type to be MSI-X vector and the managed device id is set to \field{vdev_id} > +field. In the result of a successful operation, the amount of MSI-X interrupt vectors that is currently assigned to the subject managed device is > +returned by the device in \field{resource_count} field of the virtio_admin_device_mgmt_result structure. > +See section \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT command} for more details. > + > +\paragraph{MSI-X configuration sequence example}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Admin command set / VF MSI-X control / MSI-X configuration sequence example } > + > +A typical sequence for configuring MSI-X vectors for PCI VFs using MSI-X vector management mechanism is following: as follows > + > +\begin{enumerate} > +\item Ensure that driver doesn't run and it is safe to change MSI-X (e.g. disable sriov auto probing) > + > +\item Load the PF driver > + > +\item Enable SR-IOV by following the PCI specification > + > +\item Query the management device capabilities using commands VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_IDENTIFY, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS and VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS > + > +\item Find the managed VF vdev_id using commands VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST and VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_INFO > + > +\item Query the VF MSI-X configuration using command VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT (query operation) > + > +\item Assign desired MSI-X configuration for the VF using command VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT (assign operation) > + > +\item After successful completion of the assignment, load the VF driver > + > +\item Assign the VF to a VM > + > +\item After VM/VF use is completed, user assigns different MSI-X value and repeats the steps of 7 onwards > + > +\end{enumerate} > + explain who does which steps above > \section{Virtio Over MMIO}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over MMIO} > > Virtual environments without PCI support (a common situation in > diff --git a/introduction.tex b/introduction.tex > index 94dd7a2..b5906c8 100644 > --- a/introduction.tex > +++ b/introduction.tex > @@ -260,5 +260,30 @@ \subsection{virtio subsystem}\label{sec:Introduction / Definitions / virtio subs > > VQN and vdev_id are exposed via Admin Command Set. > > +\subsection{virtio management device}\label{sec:Introduction / Definitions / virtio management device} > + > +A virtio device that supports VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS and > +VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST Admin commands and can manage a virtio managed device. > +A virtio subsystem may contain zero or more management devices. > + > +A PCI SR-IOV Physical Function based virtio device is an example of a possible virtio management device. > + > +\subsection{virtio direct management device}\label{sec:Introduction / Definitions / virtio direct management device} > + > +A virtio management device that can set \field{dst_type} to 0 (self) and to 1 (other virtio device in the same subsystem), and set \field{vdev_id} to an id that corresponds with > +one of its managed virtio devices for the following admin commands (if these fields are applicable): VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_IDENTIFY, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_INFO > +and VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT. > + > +The managed device list can be queried using VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST. > + > +A virtio subsystem may contain zero or more direct management devices. this does not explain what *is* a direct management device. are there non direct management devices? > + > +\subsection{virtio managed device}\label{sec:Introduction / Definitions / virtio managed device} > + > +A virtio device that can be managed by a virtio management device. > +A virtio subsystem may contain zero or more managed devices. is it still useful without managed devices? does management device belong to same subsystem and does it always count as a managed device managed by itself? > + > +A PCI SR-IOV Virtual Function based virtio device is an example of a possible virtio managed device. > + > \newpage This kind of thing does not belong in the introduction IMHO. > -- > 2.21.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] Introduce MGMT Admin commands 2022-04-04 13:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2022-04-04 17:08 ` Max Gurtovoy 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Max Gurtovoy @ 2022-04-04 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael S. Tsirkin Cc: virtio-comment, cohuck, virtio-dev, jasowang, parav, shahafs, oren, stefanha On 4/4/2022 4:58 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 06:02:37PM +0200, Max Gurtovoy wrote: >> Introduce the concept of a management and a managed device. A >> management device supports the VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT, >> VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS and >> VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST commands to manage some resources of >> the managed device. >> >> Also introduce a new mechanism to issue commands with dst_type field >> that is not "self". With the new mechanism, driver can set dst_type to 1 >> and use the the vdev_id common field to describe the target vdev_id. >> >> This mechanism is useful for virtio subsystems with multiple devices >> with various different capabilities. For example, a virtio subsystem >> that contains a PCI PF and its VF. For this subsystem, a clever system >> administrator can use admin commands to map between a vdev_id and a VF >> number and use it to manipulate the VF resources. >> >> As we know, a typical cloud provider SR-IOV use case is to create many >> VFs for use by guest VMs. The VFs may not be assigned to a VM until a >> user requests a VM of a certain size, e.g., number of CPUs. A VF may >> need MSI-X vectors proportional to the number of CPUs in the VM, but >> there is no standard way today in the spec to change the number of MSI-X >> vectors supported by a VF, although there are some operating systems >> that support this. >> >> The new admin mechanism manages the MSI-X interrupt vectors assignments >> of a managed PCI device (i.e. VF) by its management devices (i.e. its >> parent PF) but can easily extended to any other generic resource >> management. >> >> Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com> >> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> >> --- >> admin.tex | 205 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> content.tex | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++ >> introduction.tex | 25 ++++++ >> 3 files changed, 310 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/admin.tex b/admin.tex >> index ed9f6bd..f069dd5 100644 >> --- a/admin.tex >> +++ b/admin.tex >> @@ -9,11 +9,13 @@ \section{Admin command set}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admi >> le16 command; >> /* >> * 0 - self >> - * 1 - 65535 are reserved >> + * 1 - other virtio device in the same subsystem (described by vdev_id) >> + * 2 - 65535 are reserved >> */ >> le16 dst_type; >> + le64 vdev_id; > alignment issues here. Also can we rename dst_type and vdev_id so they > are consistent? dst_id maybe? what alignment ? maybe dest_vdev_id ? >> /* reserved for common cmd fields */ >> - u8 reserved[20]; >> + u8 reserved[12]; >> u8 command_specific_data[]; >> >> /* Device-writable part */ > Oh ok, so this is in there as I suggested in the other email. Good. right. > > The way it's split makes review a bit hard ... maybe the aspects > dealing with vdev_id can be moved to a previous patch in the > next version. > > not critical. But nobody used it before this series. For me it doesn't matter, I can move it to earlier commit. > >> @@ -37,9 +39,12 @@ \section{Admin command set}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admi >> \hline >> 03h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_INVALID_FIELD & invalid field was set \\ >> \hline >> +04h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_INVALID_VDEV_ID & invalid vdev_id was set \\ >> +\hline >> + >> \end{tabular} >> >> -The \field{command}, \field{dst_type} and \field{command_specific_data} are >> +The \field{command}, \field{dst_type}, \field{vdev_id} and \field{command_specific_data} are >> set by the driver, and the device sets the \field{status}, the >> \field{command_specific_error} and the \field{command_specific_result}, >> if needed. >> @@ -48,9 +53,12 @@ \section{Admin command set}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admi >> >> The mandatory fields to be set by the driver, for all admin commands, are \field{command} and \field{dst_type}. >> >> +The optional unused fields to be zeroed by the driver. >> + > it's not clear what does this refer to. to fields that are not used/applicable to some command. > >> The \field{command} defines the opcode for the command. The value for each command can be found in each command section. >> >> -The \field{dst_type} defines the target virtio device for the command. This value should be set to 0 (self). >> +The \field{dst_type} defines the target virtio device for the command. This value can be set to 0 (self) or 1 (other virtio device in the same subsystem). > other -> anothere *another >> +If \field{dst_type} is set to 1, the \field{vdev_id} is valid and used to describe the vdev_id of the target virtio device. >> >> The \field{command_specific_error} should be inspected by the driver only if \field{status} is set to >> VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_CS_ERR by the device. In this case, the content of \field{command_specific_error} >> @@ -69,12 +77,25 @@ \section{Admin command set}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admi >> \hline >> 0002h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_INFO & O \\ >> \hline >> -0003h - 7FFFh & Generic admin cmds & - \\ >> +0003h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT & O \\ >> +\hline >> +0004h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS & O \\ >> +\hline >> +0005h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS & O \\ >> +\hline >> +0006h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST & O \\ >> +\hline >> +0007h - 7FFFh & Generic admin cmds & - \\ >> \hline >> 8000h - FFFFh & Reserved & - \\ >> \hline >> \end{tabular} >> >> +\begin{note} >> +{The following commands are mandatory for management devices: > pls start with an explanation of what is a management device. I added this explanation to the Basic Facilities chapter. > > >> VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_IDENTIFY, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_INFO, >> +VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS and VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST.} >> +\end{note} >> + >> \subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE IDENTIFY command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE IDENTIFY command} >> >> The VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_IDENTIFY command has no command specific data set by the driver. >> @@ -89,7 +110,9 @@ \subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE IDENTIFY command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of >> * (1 means that field was returned): >> * Bit 0 - vdev_id >> * Bit 1 - optional_caps_support >> - * Bits 2 - 63 - reserved for future fields >> + * Bit 2 - num_supported_managed_vdevs >> + * Bit 3 - max_managed_vdev_id >> + * Bits 4 - 63 - reserved for future fields >> */ >> le64 attrs_mask; >> le64 vdev_id; >> @@ -97,10 +120,16 @@ \subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE IDENTIFY command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of >> * capabilities are supported by the device: >> * Bit 0 - if set, VIRTIO_ADMIN_SUBSYSTEM_IDENTIFY supported >> * Bit 1 - if set, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_INFO supported >> - * Bits 2 - 63 - reserved for future capabilities. >> + * Bit 2 - if set, the device is a direct management device >> + * Bits 3 - 63 - reserved for future capabilities. >> */ >> le64 optional_caps_support; >> - u8 reserved[4072]; >> + /* Number of supported managed virtio devices by the target virtio device */ >> + le64 num_supported_managed_vdevs; >> + /* Maximum value of a valid managed vdev_id for the target virtio device */ >> + le64 max_managed_vdev_id; > > I thought there's another command in another patchset that gives the max > vdev id. This is the max_managed_vdev_id. It is different. > >> + >> + u8 reserved[4056]; >> }; >> \end{lstlisting} >> >> @@ -158,6 +187,166 @@ \subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE INFO command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Vi >> specification and can't be equal to zero. If bit 0 is not set, the driver will ignore \field{vf_number}.} >> \end{note} >> >> +\subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT command} >> + >> +The VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT command is used by a management device to manage resources of other virtio devices within >> +the virtio subsystem. > "manage" used too many times here, pls find another synonim. ok. I'll change it to "to control". > >> +The \field{command} is set to VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT. > This seems to just repeat VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT 3 times in a raw. > I think we need a bit more structure, e.g. chapters refer to > functionality not specific commands. E.g. look at how control vq > is defined for net. > >> + >> +The command specific data set by the driver is of form: > of the form > >> +\begin{lstlisting} >> +struct virtio_admin_device_mgmt_data { >> + /* >> + * 0 - reserved >> + * 1 - assign resource to the subject vdev_id >> + * 2 - query resource of the subject vdev_id > subject? same as target? same as destination? yes. I'll use destination naming. > >> + * 3 - 255 are reserved >> + */ >> + u8 operation; >> + /* >> + * 0 - MSI-X vector >> + * 1 - 65535 are reserved >> + */ >> + le16 resource; >> + /* The amount of elements for the operation to the given resource */ >> + le32 resource_count; >> + u8 reserved[57]; >> +}; >> +\end{lstlisting} >> + >> +The following table describes the command specific error codes codes: >> + >> +\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} >> +\hline >> +Opcode & Status & Description \\ >> +\hline \hline >> +00h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_CS_ERR_VDEV_IN_USE & target device is in use, operation failed \\ >> +\hline >> +01h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_CS_ERR_RSC_COUNT_EXCEED & resource count exceed the max possible value \\ >> +\hline >> +02h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_CS_ERR_NO_RSC & Mgmt device don't have requested resource count \\ >> +\hline >> +03h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_CS_RSC_UNSUPPORTED & unsupported or invalid resource \\ >> +\hline >> +04h & VIRTIO_ADMIN_CS_OP_UNSUPPORTED & unsupported or invalid operation \\ >> +\hline >> +05h - FFh & Reserved & - \\ >> +\hline >> +\end{tabular} >> + >> +This command, upon success, returns a data buffer that describes the information according to the requested operation. >> +This information is of form: >> +\begin{lstlisting} >> +struct virtio_admin_device_mgmt_result { >> + le32 resource_count; >> + u8 reserved[12]; >> +}; >> +\end{lstlisting} >> + >> +If the requested operation was "assign resource to the subject vdev_id", the resource_count will return the count of the assigned >> +resources to the subject vdev_id. Upon success, this value should be equal to the \field{resource_count} of the virtio_admin_device_mgmt_data >> +structure. In case of a failure, the value of this field is undefined. >> + >> +If the requested operation was "query resource of the subject vdev_id", the resource_count will return the count of the currently assigned >> +resources to the subject vdev_id upon success. In case of a failure, the value of this field is undefined. >> + >> +\begin{note} >> +{MSI-X vector resource type is valid only for PCI devices. VIRTIO_ADMIN_CS_RSC_UNSUPPORTED error is >> +returned when the destination device is not a PCI device.} >> +\end{note} >> + >> +\begin{note} >> +{For this command, if setting \field{resource} to MSI-X vector type, the \field{vdev_id} can't be associated to a Virtual Function with >> +VF index greater than NumVFs value as defined in the PCI specification or smaller than 1. An error is returned when \field{vdev_id} is out of the range.} >> +\end{note} >> + >> +\subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT CAPS command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT CAPS command} >> + >> +The VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS upon success, returns a data buffer that describes the management device capabilities. >> +The \field{command} is set to VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS. >> + >> +Upon success, the returned data buffer is of form: >> +\begin{lstlisting} >> +struct virtio_admin_device_mgmt_caps_result { >> + /* >> + * caps[0] - Bit 0, if set, MSI-X vector resource mgmt is supported >> + * Bit 1 - Bit 7 are reserved >> + * caps[1] - Bit 0 - Bit 7 are reserved >> + * caps[2] - Bit 0 - Bit 7 are reserved >> + * .... >> + * caps[8191] - Bit 0 - Bit 7 are reserved >> + */ >> + u8 caps[8191]; >> +}; >> +\end{lstlisting} >> + >> +\begin{note} >> +{MSI-X vector resource management is applicable only for PCI devices. Thus, MSI-X vector resource >> +capability bit can be set to 1 only if the subject vdev_id is a management device that can manage PCI devices (e.g. PCI Physical Function virtio device). >> +For more details on MSI-X vector management support see section \ref{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Admin command set / MSI-X vector management}.} >> +\end{note} >> + >> +\subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT ATTRS command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT ATTRS command} >> + >> +The VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS upon success, returns a data buffer that describes the management device attributes. >> +The \field{command} is set to VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS. >> + >> +Upon success, the returned data buffer is of form: >> +\begin{lstlisting} >> +struct virtio_admin_device_mgmt_attrs_result { >> + /* For compatibility - indicates which of the below fields were returned >> + * (1 means that field was returned): >> + * Bit 0 - vfs_total_msix_count >> + * Bit 1 - vfs_assigned_msix_count >> + * Bit 2 - per_vf_max_msix_count >> + * Bits 3 - 63 - reserved for future fields >> + */ >> + le64 attrs_mask; >> + >> + /* Total number of msix vectors for the total number of VFs */ >> + le32 vfs_total_msix_count; >> + /* Assigned number of msix vectors for the enabled VFs */ >> + le32 vfs_assigned_msix_count; >> + /* Max number of msix vectors that can be assigned for a single VF */ >> + le16 per_vf_max_msix_count; >> + >> + u8 reserved[4078]; >> +}; >> +\end{lstlisting} >> + >> +\begin{note} >> +{The \field{vfs_total_msix_count}, \field{vfs_assigned_msix_count} and \field{per_vf_max_msix_count} returned if the >> +subject vdev_id is a management device that can allocate/deallocate MSI-X resources for PCI VFs devices. >> +Otherwise, the associated bits in \field{attrs_mask} are zeroed.} >> +\end{note} >> + >> +\subsection{VIRTIO ADMIN MANAGED DEVICE LIST command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN MANAGED DEVICE LIST command} >> + >> +The VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST upon success, returns a data buffer that describes an ordered list of up to 510 managed >> +virtio devices, in ascending order, that can be managed by the target management virtio device. > So 510 might be quite limited. Do we really need such a degree of > flexibility? Why not just have all numbers 0 to X? Result buffer I defined is 4KB in size. We can increase it. > >> +The returned list contain device identifiers with vdev_id greater than or equal to the value of \field{first_vdev_id} in the command specific data. >> +The \field{command} is set to VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST. >> + >> +The command specific data set by the driver is of form: >> +\begin{lstlisting} >> +struct virtio_admin_managed_device_list_data { >> + le64 first_vdev_id; >> +}; >> +\end{lstlisting} > So this is a way to iterate over devices in groups of 510. > It's not terrible but why not just allow a bigger buffer? How big ? 64KB is better than 4KB ? if so, I'll change to 64KB. > >> + >> +Upon success, the returned data buffer is of form: >> +\begin{lstlisting} >> +struct virtio_admin_managed_device_list_result { >> + /* Number of entries in the vdev_ids list */ >> + le16 num_identifiers; >> + /* Number of currently valid managed virtio devices by the target virtio device */ >> + le64 num_managed_vdevs; > alignment issues here. I added reserved bytes. where is the issue ? > >> + u8 reserved[6]; >> + /* List of managed vdev_ids. Only first num_identifiers are valid. */ >> + le64 vdev_ids[510]; >> +}; >> +\end{lstlisting} >> + >> \section{Admin Virtqueues}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin Virtqueues} >> >> An admin virtqueue is a management interface of a device that can be used to send administrative >> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex >> index bf46192..27353ba 100644 >> --- a/content.tex >> +++ b/content.tex >> @@ -451,6 +451,19 @@ \section{Exporting Objects}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Expo >> >> \input{admin.tex} >> >> +\section{Device management}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Device management} >> + >> +A virtio subsystem might be consist > might consist? > >> of one or more virtio devices. > what does might imply here? when does it and when does it not?A virtio subsystem might be consist of one or more virtio devices. "A virtio subsystem consist of one or more virtio devices." > >> For example, virtio PCI PF and its VFS compose a virtio subsystem. > it's not just an example, is it? it's actually described in the > following text. It's an example of one possible virtio subsystem. > >> +A capable PCI PF device might act as the management device in the subsystem, and its PCI VFs are the managed devices. >> +A management device might have various management capabilities and attributes to manage its managed devices. The capabilities exposed >> +in the result of VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS command (see section \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT CAPS command} >> +for more details) and the attributes in the result of VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS command (see section \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT ATTRS command} >> +for more details). The list of the managed devices returned in the result of VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST command >> +(see section \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN MANAGED DEVICE LIST command}) >> + >> +The management device will use the VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT admin command to manage its managed devices (see section >> +\ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT command} for more details). >> + > Please find a way not to rephrase above section so as not to repeat "manage" more than > once in a sentence. rephrase ? or not to rephrase ? >> \chapter{General Initialization And Device Operation}\label{sec:General Initialization And Device Operation} >> >> We start with an overview of device initialization, then expand on the >> @@ -1759,6 +1772,81 @@ \subsubsection{Driver Handling Interrupts}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / >> \end{itemize} >> \end{itemize} >> >> +\subsection{PCI-specific Admin capabilities}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Admin capabilities} >> + >> +This documents the group of Admin capabilities for PCI virtio devices. > what does "this" refer to? > what documents? The section/chapter. I can remove the sentence. > >> Each capability is >> +implemented using one or more Admin queue commands. >> + >> +\subsubsection{MSI-X vector management}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Admin command set / MSI-X vector management} >> + >> +This capability enables a virtio management device to control the assignment of MSI-X interrupt vectors >> +for its managed devices. In PCI, a management device can be the PF device and the managed device can be the VF. > .. or? can they be something else? We don't want to limit the specification. In general, A subsystem may include more than 1 PF. E.g. 10 PFs with 16 VFs each and 1 Management Device to manage the entire subsystem. > >> +Capable management devices will need to implement VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS >> +and VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST admin commands, report the MSI-X attributes > what are these attributes? They can be found at virtio_admin_device_mgmt_attrs_result structure. > >> in the result of VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS and report that MSI-X >> +vector resource management is supported by setting bit 1 of caps[0] in the result of VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS admin command. >> +See sections \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT CAPS command} and >> +\ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT ATTRS command} for more details. >> + >> +In the result of VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS admin command, a capable management device will return the total number of >> +msix vectors for its VFs in \field{vfs_total_msix_count} field, > are these always VFs then? does this include the PF itself? In this patch we introduced MSIX configuration of VFs. should we add also the possibility to configure other PFs in the subsystem in this stage ? maybe the bellow is better: /* Total number of msix vectors that can be controlled by the dst device */ le32 total_msix_count; /* Assigned number of msix vectors by the dst device */ le32 assigned_msix_count; /* Max number of msix vectors that can be assigned by the dst device for a single VF */ le16 per_vf_max_msix_count; > >> the number of already assigned msix vectors for its VFs in >> +\field{vfs_assigned_msix_count} field and also the maximal number of msix vectors that can be assigned for a single VF in >> +\field{per_vf_max_msix_count} field. In addition, bit 0, bit 1 and bit 2 are set to indicate on the validity > indicate is transitive. > > indicate the validity thanks. > >> of the other 3 >> +fields in the \field{attrs_mask} field of the result buffer. >> +See section \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT ATTRS command} for more details. >> + >> +In the result of VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST admin command, a capable management device will return a list of associated managed virtio devices. >> +See section \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN MANAGED DEVICE LIST command} for more details. >> + >> +A management device that supports VFs MSI-X vector management capability > > "VF" since you have reduced relative here ok. > > Is this then MSI-X vector management capability or a VF MSI-X vector > management capability? For now it's defined to VFs but we can extend it in the future. > > >> , will allocate MSI-X resources provided by the parent PF of the SR-IOV VFs. >> +The default assignment of the MSI-X vectors for managed devices is out of the scope of this specification. > I don't see why it's out of scope. Maybe it's up to the device. OK. I'll mention that it's device specific. > But please don't declare whatever is not spefified out of scope > automatically. > And, I think it's relevant to be able to query what has been set > or what the default was. add a command for that? you can query the values using the VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT command > > >> +A driver, using VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT can update the MSI-X assignment for a specific managed device. >> +In the data of VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT admin command, a driver set > sets? thanks. > >> the \field{resource} type to be MSI-X vector and the >> +amount of MSI-X interrupt vectors to configure to the subject managed device in \field{resource_count}. The managed device id is set to \field{vdev_id} field. >> + >> +A successful operation guarantees that the requested amount of MSI-X interrupt vectors was assigned to the subject management device. >> +This value is also returned in the virtio_admin_device_mgmt_result structure. >> +Also, a successful operation guarantees that the MSI-X capability access by the subject PCI device defined by the PCI specification must reflect >> +the new configuration in all relevant fields. For example, by default if the PCI VF has been assigned 4 MSI-X vectors, and VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT >> +increases the MSI-X vectors to 8; on this change, reading Table size field of the MSI-X message control register will reflect a value of 7. >> + >> +It is beyond the scope of the virtio specification > Let's leave the question of scope aside. > Instead, please explain that system software needs to use system > specific means to do that. Ok something like: "System software to ensure the necessary synchronization (using system specific means) that a virtio PCI VF device interrupt configuration modification is reflected in the PCI device. It is expected that any modern system software that implements virtio drivers and PCI subsystem will ensure that any changes occurring in the VF interrupt configuration is either updated in the PCI VF device or such configuration fails." ? > >> to define >> necessary synchronization in system software to ensure that a virtio >> PCI VF device >> +interrupt configuration modification is reflected in the PCI device. However, it is expected that any modern system software implementing virtio >> +drivers and PCI subsystem will ensure that any changes occurring in the VF interrupt configuration is either updated in the PCI VF device or >> +such configuration fails. >> + >> +To query amount of MSI-X interrupt vectors that is currently assigned to a managed device, the driver issue > > issues thanks. >> VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT with \field{operation} set to >> +"query resource of the subject vdev_id" value (== 2). The driver also set the \field{resource} type to be MSI-X vector and the managed device id is set to \field{vdev_id} >> +field. In the result of a successful operation, the amount of MSI-X interrupt vectors that is currently assigned to the subject managed device is >> +returned by the device in \field{resource_count} field of the virtio_admin_device_mgmt_result structure. >> +See section \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin command set / VIRTIO ADMIN DEVICE MGMT command} for more details. >> + >> +\paragraph{MSI-X configuration sequence example}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Admin command set / VF MSI-X control / MSI-X configuration sequence example } >> + >> +A typical sequence for configuring MSI-X vectors for PCI VFs using MSI-X vector management mechanism is following: > as follows ok. > >> + >> +\begin{enumerate} >> +\item Ensure that driver doesn't run and it is safe to change MSI-X (e.g. disable sriov auto probing) >> + >> +\item Load the PF driver >> + >> +\item Enable SR-IOV by following the PCI specification >> + >> +\item Query the management device capabilities using commands VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_IDENTIFY, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS and VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS >> + >> +\item Find the managed VF vdev_id using commands VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST and VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_INFO >> + >> +\item Query the VF MSI-X configuration using command VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT (query operation) >> + >> +\item Assign desired MSI-X configuration for the VF using command VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT (assign operation) >> + >> +\item After successful completion of the assignment, load the VF driver >> + >> +\item Assign the VF to a VM >> + >> +\item After VM/VF use is completed, user assigns different MSI-X value and repeats the steps of 7 onwards >> + >> +\end{enumerate} >> + > explain who does which steps above well I can't guess it. it can be done manually by some sys admin or by automatic orchestration SW. > >> \section{Virtio Over MMIO}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over MMIO} >> >> Virtual environments without PCI support (a common situation in >> diff --git a/introduction.tex b/introduction.tex >> index 94dd7a2..b5906c8 100644 >> --- a/introduction.tex >> +++ b/introduction.tex >> @@ -260,5 +260,30 @@ \subsection{virtio subsystem}\label{sec:Introduction / Definitions / virtio subs >> >> VQN and vdev_id are exposed via Admin Command Set. >> >> +\subsection{virtio management device}\label{sec:Introduction / Definitions / virtio management device} >> + >> +A virtio device that supports VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_CAPS, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT_ATTRS and >> +VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST Admin commands and can manage a virtio managed device. >> +A virtio subsystem may contain zero or more management devices. >> + >> +A PCI SR-IOV Physical Function based virtio device is an example of a possible virtio management device. >> + >> +\subsection{virtio direct management device}\label{sec:Introduction / Definitions / virtio direct management device} >> + >> +A virtio management device that can set \field{dst_type} to 0 (self) and to 1 (other virtio device in the same subsystem), and set \field{vdev_id} to an id that corresponds with >> +one of its managed virtio devices for the following admin commands (if these fields are applicable): VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_IDENTIFY, VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_INFO >> +and VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_MGMT. >> + >> +The managed device list can be queried using VIRTIO_ADMIN_MANAGED_DEVICE_LIST. >> + >> +A virtio subsystem may contain zero or more direct management devices. > > this does not explain what *is* a direct management device. are there > non direct management devices? what do you mean it doesn't explain ? There is an exact definition. For now I didn't define indirection of mgmt devices. > >> + >> +\subsection{virtio managed device}\label{sec:Introduction / Definitions / virtio managed device} >> + >> +A virtio device that can be managed by a virtio management device. >> +A virtio subsystem may contain zero or more managed devices. > is it still useful without managed devices? > does management device belong to same subsystem and does it always count as > a managed device managed by itself? Yes, it's useful. The whole point of the subsystem is to group devices. So yes, the mgmt device and the managed device are in the same subsystem. A device can configure itself. We still haven't described commands for it but we can imagine some: change a virtio block backend device format from 512B sector to 4KB sector. > >> + >> +A PCI SR-IOV Virtual Function based virtio device is an example of a possible virtio managed device. >> + >> \newpage > > > This kind of thing does not belong in the introduction IMHO. Where is the right place to put it ? > >> -- >> 2.21.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] Introduce MGMT Admin commands 2022-03-02 16:02 ` [virtio-comment] [PATCH v4 1/1] Introduce MGMT Admin commands Max Gurtovoy 2022-04-04 13:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2022-04-04 22:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2022-04-05 8:44 ` Max Gurtovoy 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2022-04-04 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Max Gurtovoy Cc: virtio-comment, cohuck, virtio-dev, jasowang, parav, shahafs, oren, stefanha On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 06:02:37PM +0200, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > +It is beyond the scope of the virtio specification to define necessary synchronization in system software to ensure that a virtio PCI VF device > +interrupt configuration modification is reflected in the PCI device. However, it is expected that any modern system software implementing virtio > +drivers and PCI subsystem will ensure that any changes occurring in the VF interrupt configuration is either updated in the PCI VF device or > +such configuration fails. I am no longer sure this assertion holds. For example, how would the PF driver ensure that e.g. VFIO is not bound to a VF for passthrough to a VM and is not configuring the MSI-X configuration of the VF? I don't really see a way to do that cleanly. Would you care to post a proof of concept or even a pseudo-code patch? It appears even harder to support in an (admittedly, uncommon, but apparently available due to virtio subsystem not necessarily matching the PF boundary) case where the admin queue is in a VF and so the admin driver is running within guest. I thus have been thinking of an alternate approach, where the # of MSIX vectors does not change, but the # of VQs does. Since guests do not currently request more vectors than VQs, this will address the requirement in a cleaner way that guests should be able to universally support. Synchronization then can be achieved by failing the command if any status bits (or just VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER? did not think too deeply about the difference ...) in the affected VFs are set indicating an attached driver. A new feature bit might be required for this and maybe a new field indicating the actual # of vectors. -- MST ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] Introduce MGMT Admin commands 2022-04-04 22:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2022-04-05 8:44 ` Max Gurtovoy 2022-04-05 12:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Max Gurtovoy @ 2022-04-05 8:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael S. Tsirkin Cc: virtio-comment, cohuck, virtio-dev, jasowang, parav, shahafs, oren, stefanha On 4/5/2022 1:29 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 06:02:37PM +0200, Max Gurtovoy wrote: >> +It is beyond the scope of the virtio specification to define necessary synchronization in system software to ensure that a virtio PCI VF device >> +interrupt configuration modification is reflected in the PCI device. However, it is expected that any modern system software implementing virtio >> +drivers and PCI subsystem will ensure that any changes occurring in the VF interrupt configuration is either updated in the PCI VF device or >> +such configuration fails. > I am no longer sure this assertion holds. For example, how would the PF > driver ensure that e.g. VFIO is not bound to a VF for passthrough to > a VM and is not configuring the MSI-X configuration of the VF? > I don't really see a way to do that cleanly. > > Would you care to post a proof of concept or even a pseudo-code patch? I don't think we a POC for now. We have an example of MSI-X configuration in mlx5 driver: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20210314124256.70253-1-leon@kernel.org/ The infrastructure in Linux already exist. > > It appears even harder to support in an (admittedly, uncommon, > but apparently available due to virtio subsystem not necessarily > matching the PF boundary) case where the admin queue is > in a VF and so the admin driver is running within guest. I'm not sure I follow. If the VF will support AQ it doesn't mean it will have all the optional functionality we're adding to the PF. > > I thus have been thinking of an alternate approach, where the # of MSIX > vectors does not change, but the # of VQs does. Since guests do not > currently request more vectors than VQs, this will address the > requirement in a cleaner way that guests should be able to universally > support. Synchronization then can be achieved by failing the command if > any status bits (or just VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER? did not think too > deeply about the difference ...) in the affected VFs are set indicating > an attached driver. A new feature bit might be required for this and > maybe a new field indicating the actual # of vectors. We discussed about the VQs settings in the past. It is more challenging thing to do since each device type has it's own VQ types and configurations. MSI-X is a common feature that we can apply on each virtio device. > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] Introduce MGMT Admin commands 2022-04-05 8:44 ` Max Gurtovoy @ 2022-04-05 12:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2022-04-05 12:49 ` Max Gurtovoy 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2022-04-05 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Max Gurtovoy Cc: virtio-comment, cohuck, virtio-dev, jasowang, parav, shahafs, oren, stefanha On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 11:44:34AM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > > On 4/5/2022 1:29 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 06:02:37PM +0200, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > > > +It is beyond the scope of the virtio specification to define necessary synchronization in system software to ensure that a virtio PCI VF device > > > +interrupt configuration modification is reflected in the PCI device. However, it is expected that any modern system software implementing virtio > > > +drivers and PCI subsystem will ensure that any changes occurring in the VF interrupt configuration is either updated in the PCI VF device or > > > +such configuration fails. > > I am no longer sure this assertion holds. For example, how would the PF > > driver ensure that e.g. VFIO is not bound to a VF for passthrough to > > a VM and is not configuring the MSI-X configuration of the VF? > > I don't really see a way to do that cleanly. > > > > Would you care to post a proof of concept or even a pseudo-code patch? > > I don't think we a POC for now. > > We have an example of MSI-X configuration in mlx5 driver: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20210314124256.70253-1-leon@kernel.org/ > > The infrastructure in Linux already exist. I don't see where does it block binding VFIO to VFs? > > > > It appears even harder to support in an (admittedly, uncommon, > > but apparently available due to virtio subsystem not necessarily > > matching the PF boundary) case where the admin queue is > > in a VF and so the admin driver is running within guest. > > I'm not sure I follow. > > If the VF will support AQ it doesn't mean it will have all the optional > functionality we're adding to the PF. I am saying I don't see how can software enforce the requirements you are making of it. > > > > I thus have been thinking of an alternate approach, where the # of MSIX > > vectors does not change, but the # of VQs does. Since guests do not > > currently request more vectors than VQs, this will address the > > requirement in a cleaner way that guests should be able to universally > > support. Synchronization then can be achieved by failing the command if > > any status bits (or just VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER? did not think too > > deeply about the difference ...) in the affected VFs are set indicating > > an attached driver. A new feature bit might be required for this and > > maybe a new field indicating the actual # of vectors. > > We discussed about the VQs settings in the past. It is more challenging > thing to do since each device type has it's own VQ types and configurations. > > MSI-X is a common feature that we can apply on each virtio device. I am not sure the feature works robustly though. Yes controlling VQs is more work but maybe we just have to bite the bullet. Yes we discussed it and I was not happy then either, but I did not notice the VFIO issue then. -- MST ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] Introduce MGMT Admin commands 2022-04-05 12:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2022-04-05 12:49 ` Max Gurtovoy 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Max Gurtovoy @ 2022-04-05 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael S. Tsirkin Cc: virtio-comment, cohuck, virtio-dev, jasowang, parav, shahafs, oren, stefanha On 4/5/2022 3:36 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 11:44:34AM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: >> On 4/5/2022 1:29 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 06:02:37PM +0200, Max Gurtovoy wrote: >>>> +It is beyond the scope of the virtio specification to define necessary synchronization in system software to ensure that a virtio PCI VF device >>>> +interrupt configuration modification is reflected in the PCI device. However, it is expected that any modern system software implementing virtio >>>> +drivers and PCI subsystem will ensure that any changes occurring in the VF interrupt configuration is either updated in the PCI VF device or >>>> +such configuration fails. >>> I am no longer sure this assertion holds. For example, how would the PF >>> driver ensure that e.g. VFIO is not bound to a VF for passthrough to >>> a VM and is not configuring the MSI-X configuration of the VF? >>> I don't really see a way to do that cleanly. >>> >>> Would you care to post a proof of concept or even a pseudo-code patch? >> I don't think we a POC for now. >> >> We have an example of MSI-X configuration in mlx5 driver: >> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Flinux-pci%2F20210314124256.70253-1-leon%40kernel.org%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cmgurtovoy%40nvidia.com%7C23ebecc236e94e420cc108da1700e5a3%7C43083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C637847589877104344%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=i%2F2Wyy1HX7GqOWUHuHdKcO%2FXBOh8Tn5jIwh4tw0yv0g%3D&reserved=0 >> >> The infrastructure in Linux already exist. > I don't see where does it block binding VFIO to VFs? The flow is: 1. bind the PF to the original driver (virtio in our case or mlx5 in the above example case) 2. disable VFs auto probing 3. enable sriov 4. configure msix for VFs using PF interface 5. probe VFs using what ever driver you want (virtio/VFIO or mlx5/VFIO) > >>> It appears even harder to support in an (admittedly, uncommon, >>> but apparently available due to virtio subsystem not necessarily >>> matching the PF boundary) case where the admin queue is >>> in a VF and so the admin driver is running within guest. >> I'm not sure I follow. >> >> If the VF will support AQ it doesn't mean it will have all the optional >> functionality we're adding to the PF. > I am saying I don't see how can software enforce the requirements > you are making of it. The device will not publish these capabilities for a VF device. >>> I thus have been thinking of an alternate approach, where the # of MSIX >>> vectors does not change, but the # of VQs does. Since guests do not >>> currently request more vectors than VQs, this will address the >>> requirement in a cleaner way that guests should be able to universally >>> support. Synchronization then can be achieved by failing the command if >>> any status bits (or just VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER? did not think too >>> deeply about the difference ...) in the affected VFs are set indicating >>> an attached driver. A new feature bit might be required for this and >>> maybe a new field indicating the actual # of vectors. >> We discussed about the VQs settings in the past. It is more challenging >> thing to do since each device type has it's own VQ types and configurations. >> >> MSI-X is a common feature that we can apply on each virtio device. > I am not sure the feature works robustly though. Yes controlling > VQs is more work but maybe we just have to bite the bullet. > Yes we discussed it and I was not happy then either, but I > did not notice the VFIO issue then. If you're not sure MSI-X assignment by PF to it's VFs doesn't work in Linux so lets open a discussion with the Linux maintainers that were involved in the process of upstreaming the solution I mentioned above. This include the RDMA maintainers, PCI subsystem maintainers and Linux core maintainers. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-05 12:49 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-03-02 16:02 [virtio-comment] [PATCH v4 0/1] VIRTIO: Introduce MGMT device and Provision maximum MSI-X vectors for a VF Max Gurtovoy 2022-03-02 16:02 ` [virtio-comment] [PATCH v4 1/1] Introduce MGMT Admin commands Max Gurtovoy 2022-04-04 13:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2022-04-04 17:08 ` Max Gurtovoy 2022-04-04 22:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2022-04-05 8:44 ` Max Gurtovoy 2022-04-05 12:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2022-04-05 12:49 ` Max Gurtovoy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox