Discussion of the implementations of VIRTIO specification
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org,
	virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, jasowang@redhat.com,
	mst@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, sgarzare@redhat.com,
	stefanha@redhat.com, nrupal.jani@intel.com,
	Piotr.Uminski@intel.com, hang.yuan@intel.com
Cc: virtio@lists.oasis-open.org,
	Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>,
	pasic@linux.ibm.com, Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@nvidia.com>,
	Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>,
	Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 01/10] virtio: document forward compatibility guarantees
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 16:08:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221123210706.21476-2-mst@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221123210706.21476-1-mst@redhat.com>

Feature negotiation forms the basis of forward compatibility
guarantees of virtio but has never been properly documented.
Do it now.

Suggested-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
---
 content.tex | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)

diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
index 3051399..e3203be 100644
--- a/content.tex
+++ b/content.tex
@@ -114,21 +114,63 @@ \section{Feature Bits}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Feature B
 In particular, new fields in the device configuration space are
 indicated by offering a new feature bit.
 
+To keep te feature negotiation mechanism extensible, it is important
+that devices \em{do not} offer any feature bits that they would not be
+able to handle if the driver accepted them (even though drivers are not
+supposed to accept them in the first place even if offered, according to
+this version of the specification.) Likewise, it is important that
+drivers \em{do not} accept feature bits they do not know how to handle
+(even though devices are not supposed to offer them in the first place,
+according to this version of the specification.) The preferred way for
+handling reserved and unexpected features is that the driver ignores
+them.
+
+In particular, this is
+especially important for features limited to specific transports,
+as enabling these for more transports in future versions of the
+specification is highly likely to require changing the behaviour
+from drivers and devices.  Drivers and devices supporting
+multiple transports need to carefully maintain per-transport
+lists of allowed features.
+
 \drivernormative{\subsection}{Feature Bits}{Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Feature Bits}
 The driver MUST NOT accept a feature which the device did not offer,
 and MUST NOT accept a feature which requires another feature which was
 not accepted.
 
+The driver MUST validate the feature bits offered by the device.
+The driver MUST ignore and MUST NOT accept any feature bit that is
+\begin{itemize}
+\item not described in this specification,
+\item marked as reserved,
+\item not supported for the specific transport,
+\item not defined for the device type.
+\end{itemize}
+
 The driver SHOULD go into backwards compatibility mode
 if the device does not offer a feature it understands, otherwise MUST
 set the FAILED \field{device status} bit and cease initialization.
 
+By contrast, the driver MUST NOT fail solely because a feature
+it does not understand has been offered by the device.
+
 \devicenormative{\subsection}{Feature Bits}{Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Feature Bits}
 The device MUST NOT offer a feature which requires another feature
 which was not offered.  The device SHOULD accept any valid subset
 of features the driver accepts, otherwise it MUST fail to set the
 FEATURES_OK \field{device status} bit when the driver writes it.
 
+The device MUST NOT offer feature bits corresponding to features
+it would not support if accepted by the driver (even if the
+driver is prohibited from accepting the feature bits by the
+specification); for the sake of clarity, this refers to feature
+bits not described in this specification, reserved feature bits
+and feature bits reserved or not supported for the specific
+transport or the specific device type, but this does not preclude
+devices written to a future version of this specification from
+offering such feature bits should such a specification have a
+provision for devices to support the corresponding features.
+
 If a device has successfully negotiated a set of features
 at least once (by accepting the FEATURES_OK \field{device
 status} bit during device initialization), then it SHOULD
-- 
MST


  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-23 21:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-23 21:07 [PATCH v9 00/10] Introduce device group and device management Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-23 21:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2022-11-24  4:33   ` [PATCH v9 01/10] virtio: document forward compatibility guarantees Jason Wang
2022-11-24  6:59     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  7:34       ` Jason Wang
2022-11-24  8:15         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24 12:05           ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2022-11-25  3:17             ` Jason Wang
2022-11-25 10:37               ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2022-11-28  6:14                 ` Jason Wang
2022-11-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 02/10] admin: introduce device group and related concepts Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  5:41   ` Jason Wang
2022-11-24  7:08     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  7:37       ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2022-11-24  8:18         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24 12:12           ` Cornelia Huck
2022-11-25  3:23             ` Jason Wang
2022-11-25 10:58               ` [virtio] " Cornelia Huck
2022-11-25 12:08               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 03/10] admin: introduce group administration commands Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  5:52   ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2022-11-24  7:12     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  7:42       ` Jason Wang
2022-11-24  8:03         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-25  3:24           ` [virtio-comment] " Jason Wang
2022-11-24 12:21     ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2022-11-25  3:54       ` Jason Wang
2022-11-28 13:14   ` [virtio-comment] " Zhu Lingshan
2022-11-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 04/10] admin: introduce virtio admin virtqueues Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-28 13:12   ` [virtio-comment] " Zhu Lingshan
2022-11-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 05/10] pci: add admin vq registers to virtio over pci Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  6:00   ` Jason Wang
2022-11-24  7:14     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  7:46       ` Jason Wang
2022-11-24  8:09         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-25  3:27           ` Jason Wang
2022-11-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 06/10] mmio: document ADMIN_VQ as reserved Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  6:03   ` Jason Wang
2022-11-24  7:45     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 07/10] ccw: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 08/10] admin: command list discovery Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  6:40   ` Jason Wang
2022-11-24  8:30     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-25  3:38       ` [virtio-comment] " Jason Wang
2022-11-25 11:43         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-28  4:34           ` Jason Wang
2022-11-28  7:42             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 09/10] admin: conformance clauses Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  6:51   ` Jason Wang
2022-11-24  8:36     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-25  3:50       ` Jason Wang
2022-11-25 11:42         ` [virtio] " Cornelia Huck
2022-11-25 11:56           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-25 12:10             ` [virtio] " Cornelia Huck
2022-11-25 11:47         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-28  4:32           ` Jason Wang
2022-11-28  7:39             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24 12:28     ` [virtio] " Cornelia Huck
2022-11-25  3:38       ` Jason Wang
2022-11-23 21:08 ` [PATCH RFC v9 10/10] ccw: document more reserved features Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  6:53   ` Jason Wang
2022-11-24  8:31     ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221123210706.21476-2-mst@redhat.com \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=Piotr.Uminski@intel.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=hang.yuan@intel.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=lingshan.zhu@intel.com \
    --cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=nrupal.jani@intel.com \
    --cc=parav@nvidia.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=shahafs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtio@lists.oasis-open.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox