Discussion of the implementations of VIRTIO specification
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org,
	virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, cohuck@redhat.com,
	sgarzare@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, nrupal.jani@intel.com,
	Piotr.Uminski@intel.com, hang.yuan@intel.com,
	virtio@lists.oasis-open.org,
	Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>,
	pasic@linux.ibm.com, Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@nvidia.com>,
	Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>,
	Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/10] pci: add admin vq registers to virtio over pci
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 03:09:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221124030416-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEsVCHmu24gaY2nG3kj8cBaRZVXD0a0kxFF-6PCWmsM8dQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 03:46:00PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 3:14 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 02:00:54PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 5:08 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Add new registers to the PCI common configuration structure.
> > > >
> > > > These registers will be used for querying the indices of the admin
> > > > virtqueues of the owner device. To configure, reset or enable the admin
> > > > virtqueues, the driver should follow existing queue configuration/setup
> > > > sequence.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  content.tex | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> > > > index 04235da..aa68926 100644
> > > > --- a/content.tex
> > > > +++ b/content.tex
> > > > @@ -946,6 +946,10 @@ \subsubsection{Common configuration structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
> > > >          le64 queue_device;              /* read-write */
> > > >          le16 queue_notify_data;         /* read-only for driver */
> > > >          le16 queue_reset;               /* read-write */
> > > > +
> > > > +        /* About the administration virtqueue. */
> > > > +        le16 admin_queue_index;         /* read-only for driver */
> > > > +        le16 admin_queue_num;         /* read-only for driver */
> > >
> > > If we are adding more queue related functionality, it would be placed
> > > under the above two fields which seems not elegant. I wonder if a new
> > > structure is needed here.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> >
> > I don't expect more, if that happens we can always refactor it.
> 
> I may miss something but it should be a part of ABI. How could we
> refactor it without breaking ABI?
> 
> Thanks

         /* About the administration virtqueue. */
-        le16 admin_queue_index;         /* read-only for driver */
-        le16 admin_queue_num;         /* read-only for driver */
+        struct { /* read-only for driver */
+        	le16 index;
+        	le16 num;
+	 } admin_queue;

does not affect the ABI. But the order of things makes it less readable.

We would also have to change references to admin_queue_index with
admin_queue.index and explain the "." notation in introduction.


All doable but this patchset is large enough as it is.



> > Generally this is not C, no one compiles this directly.
> > So we do not need to add structures unless
> > they are referred to in spec text.
> >
> > > >  };
> > > >  \end{lstlisting}
> > > >
> > > > @@ -1031,6 +1035,19 @@ \subsubsection{Common configuration structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
> > > >          This field exists only if VIRTIO_F_RING_RESET has been
> > > >          negotiated. (see \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / Virtqueue Reset}).
> > > >
> > > > +\item[\field{admin_queue_index}]
> > > > +        The device uses this to report the index of the first administration virtqueue.
> > > > +        This field is valid only if VIRTIO_F_ADMIN_VQ has been negotiated.
> > > > +\item[\field{admin_queue_num}]
> > > > +       The device uses this to report the number of the
> > > > +       supported administration virtqueues.  Virtqueues with index
> > > > +       between \field{admin_queue_index} and (\field{admin_queue_index} +
> > > > +       \field{admin_queue_num}) inclusive serve as administration
> > > > +       virtqueues.
> > > > +       Thus the number of administration virtqueues equals
> > > > +       (\field{admin_queue_num} + 1).
> > > > +       This field is valid only if VIRTIO_F_ADMIN_VQ has been
> > > > +       negotiated.
> > > >  \end{description}
> > > >
> > > >  \devicenormative{\paragraph}{Common configuration structure layout}{Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / Common configuration structure layout}
> > > > @@ -1117,6 +1134,14 @@ \subsubsection{Common configuration structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
> > > >  were used before the queue reset.
> > > >  (see \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / Virtqueue Reset}).
> > > >
> > > > +If VIRTIO_F_ADMIN_VQ has been negotiated, and if the driver
> > > > +configures any administration virtqueues, the driver MUST
> > > > +configure the administration virtqueues using the index
> > > > +in the range \field{admin_queue_index} to
> > > > +\field{admin_queue_index} + \field{admin_queue_num} inclusive.
> > > > +The driver MAY configure less administration virtqueues than
> > > > +supported by the device.
> > > > +
> > > >  \subsubsection{Notification structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / Notification capability}
> > > >
> > > >  The notification location is found using the VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_NOTIFY_CFG
> > > > @@ -6992,6 +7017,15 @@ \chapter{Reserved Feature Bits}\label{sec:Reserved Feature Bits}
> > > >
> > > >    \item[VIRTIO_F_ADMIN_VQ(41)] This feature indicates that the device exposes one or more
> > > >    administration virtqueues.
> > > > +  At the moment this feature is only supported for devices using
> > > > +  \ref{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI
> > > > +         Bus}~\nameref{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus}
> > > > +         as the transport and is reserved for future use for
> > > > +         devices using other transports (see
> > > > +         \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Feature Bits}
> > > > +       and
> > > > +       \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Feature Bits} for
> > > > +       handling features reserved for future use.
> > > >
> > > >  \end{description}
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > MST
> > > >
> >


  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-24  8:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-23 21:07 [PATCH v9 00/10] Introduce device group and device management Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 01/10] virtio: document forward compatibility guarantees Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  4:33   ` Jason Wang
2022-11-24  6:59     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  7:34       ` Jason Wang
2022-11-24  8:15         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24 12:05           ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2022-11-25  3:17             ` Jason Wang
2022-11-25 10:37               ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2022-11-28  6:14                 ` Jason Wang
2022-11-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 02/10] admin: introduce device group and related concepts Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  5:41   ` Jason Wang
2022-11-24  7:08     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  7:37       ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2022-11-24  8:18         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24 12:12           ` Cornelia Huck
2022-11-25  3:23             ` Jason Wang
2022-11-25 10:58               ` [virtio] " Cornelia Huck
2022-11-25 12:08               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 03/10] admin: introduce group administration commands Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  5:52   ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2022-11-24  7:12     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  7:42       ` Jason Wang
2022-11-24  8:03         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-25  3:24           ` [virtio-comment] " Jason Wang
2022-11-24 12:21     ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2022-11-25  3:54       ` Jason Wang
2022-11-28 13:14   ` [virtio-comment] " Zhu Lingshan
2022-11-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 04/10] admin: introduce virtio admin virtqueues Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-28 13:12   ` [virtio-comment] " Zhu Lingshan
2022-11-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 05/10] pci: add admin vq registers to virtio over pci Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  6:00   ` Jason Wang
2022-11-24  7:14     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  7:46       ` Jason Wang
2022-11-24  8:09         ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2022-11-25  3:27           ` Jason Wang
2022-11-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 06/10] mmio: document ADMIN_VQ as reserved Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  6:03   ` Jason Wang
2022-11-24  7:45     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 07/10] ccw: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 08/10] admin: command list discovery Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  6:40   ` Jason Wang
2022-11-24  8:30     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-25  3:38       ` [virtio-comment] " Jason Wang
2022-11-25 11:43         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-28  4:34           ` Jason Wang
2022-11-28  7:42             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-23 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 09/10] admin: conformance clauses Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  6:51   ` Jason Wang
2022-11-24  8:36     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-25  3:50       ` Jason Wang
2022-11-25 11:42         ` [virtio] " Cornelia Huck
2022-11-25 11:56           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-25 12:10             ` [virtio] " Cornelia Huck
2022-11-25 11:47         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-28  4:32           ` Jason Wang
2022-11-28  7:39             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24 12:28     ` [virtio] " Cornelia Huck
2022-11-25  3:38       ` Jason Wang
2022-11-23 21:08 ` [PATCH RFC v9 10/10] ccw: document more reserved features Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24  6:53   ` Jason Wang
2022-11-24  8:31     ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221124030416-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=Piotr.Uminski@intel.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=hang.yuan@intel.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=lingshan.zhu@intel.com \
    --cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=nrupal.jani@intel.com \
    --cc=parav@nvidia.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=shahafs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtio@lists.oasis-open.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox